Posted on 10/13/2009 7:45:31 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer personally attacks opposing parties and disrespects the integrity of the judiciary, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judge’s rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice.
-snip-
Regrettably, the conduct of counsel Orly Taitz has crossed these lines, and Ms. Taitz must be sanctioned for her misconduct. After a full review of the sanctionable conduct, counsel’s conduct leading up to that conduct, and counsel’s response to the Court’s show cause order, the Court finds that a monetary penalty of $20,000.00 shall be imposed upon counsel Orly Taitz as punishment for her misconduct, as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct, and to protect the integrity of the Court. Payment shall be made to the United States, through the Middle District of Georgia Clerk’s Office, within thirty days of today’s Order. If counsel fails to pay the sanction due, the U.S. Attorney will be authorized to commence collection proceedings.
(Full Order at the link.)
Yeah, another “attorney”. Place holder for a DU or professional lefist scumbag.
I believe that argument has been debunked. I’ll check on it. As I understand it, “FILED” is the new terminology on all recently printed COLBs.
Your sign on date is suspicious too. Signed on just to post on the vetting threads?! ;-)
What letter is that funny looking P and how did you get it there?
Not his military records, those were released to just a few friendly reporters, including one from the Globe. The military treats the records like the state of Hawaii treats Birth Certificates. You can get your own, to get someone elses' requires a very specific interest, or permisson from the person concerned.
Did the globe ever publish those records, or important parts of them? Say the paperword for his medals. Or his orders to patrol up the Mekong to the Cambodian border, and beyond, on Christmas or Christmas eve of 1968.
Hm. If that’s your take on it, I don’t think much of your grasp on sanity, either...
What is OB?
I’m lurking/reading with blackberry. I must have typed some weird combination of characters to get that. I have no idea how to do it again nor do I know what it’s called. :-p
Or a plant.
You cannot say something is true like your age. It is not observable by anyone else. They would just be guessing.
I am not fighting anything. I didn't say that you are not 35; I say I don't believe it's factual based upon your word. You're just some argumentative guy on the internet.
I am merely pointing out that you saying your 35 does not make it a fact. What makes it a fact is that your birth occured 35 years ago and someone observed it or documentation would help. I don't include you as an observer of the actual date and time, so your stating it is a fact is not believable.
This is your problem with OB. He says something and you accept it as fact. The rest of us want some verification like documents since it's kind of more important than your age. In fact, I don't believe you are 35 and I won't put your name on the ballot until we see some verification that it is factual and true.
This is where I get off the carousal.
Great first Link! Great second link. In the middle I guess you have the birthers, who are the “missing links.”
parsy, who ain’t just blowing smoke
Two of which, should be in his possession.
He put out information that is shaded and incomplete when he could have just as easily put one of his long forms, especially the one held dearest, on-line
I have lost 3 "Birth Certificates" if you want to include the hospital "footie" copy and my current COLB from the state of MO looks just like BHO's and was sufficient for a US passport after 9/11
Did you read all 43 pages of the decision?
parsy, who is curious
funny, I posted that to someone a couple of months ago and they just keep saying “Nope”. “Better tell the people of Hawaii who are able to get a passport”.
Didn’t matter if you dropped the info right there for them they just moved on to a nonsequitor(not the Non-Sequitor) and some other nonsense.
Still, I have not been able to come up with a demand that a court would hear and somehow the demand met.
There must be a way. If Barry O. can open sealed divorce records how is that we cannot find the key for our position?
Word!
What do you mean nope? That doesn’t tell me when the COLB was printed. I can’t see the stamp on my BB. What date does it have?
If SCOTUS does not make law, explain Roe vs Wade? It is rhetorical, of course, by operation they should not be able to make law but an activist court often does, by way of the defined ruling.
Further, I don't trust that anyone actually exists unless they come complete with a certified copy of their birth certificate pasted to their forehead.
Even further, I don't accept that any creature is actually a mammal unless...
Probably best not to go there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.