[American Constitutionalist]

" While there may be courtroom behaviors Ms. Taitz could improve, the judge is obligated to separate his personal reaction to her from the legal issues she presents. "

That should be the statement of the day for this thread.
That explains why Judge Land is wrong in his decision.
The case should still be heard in spite of Orly's behavior or the case should be past onto another lawyer.
Judge Land has let his personal feelings and distaste of Orly cloud his judgment of this case, and judges should always be impartial and should not let their personal politics and ideology cloud their judgment on cases.

[parsifal]

Did you read all 43 pages of the decision?

parsy, who is curious

[tired_old_conservative]

Judges are in no way obligated to put up with incompetent, hack case work accompanied by hysterical ravings that impugn the integrity of the court. Anyone who can look at the record of decision, which includes Judge Land going out of his way to schedule an expedited hearing for Dr. Taitz’ client, and declare the judge biased is being neither honest nor objective. They are letting their personal feelings and ideology distort the factual record of what transpired.

No one has an intrinsic right to the court's time if they can't muddle together a passable representation of a case and can't behave like they have the slightest idea of their professional and ethical obligations as a lawyer.

[nufsed]

We are in the US court system where it is more important for a judge to maintain power than to have the truth come out.