Posted on 10/13/2009 7:45:31 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer personally attacks opposing parties and disrespects the integrity of the judiciary, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judge’s rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice.
-snip-
Regrettably, the conduct of counsel Orly Taitz has crossed these lines, and Ms. Taitz must be sanctioned for her misconduct. After a full review of the sanctionable conduct, counsel’s conduct leading up to that conduct, and counsel’s response to the Court’s show cause order, the Court finds that a monetary penalty of $20,000.00 shall be imposed upon counsel Orly Taitz as punishment for her misconduct, as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct, and to protect the integrity of the Court. Payment shall be made to the United States, through the Middle District of Georgia Clerk’s Office, within thirty days of today’s Order. If counsel fails to pay the sanction due, the U.S. Attorney will be authorized to commence collection proceedings.
(Full Order at the link.)
We are -- and we're going to use this issue to determine who gets to replace them.
Hey, I knew we got along well for a good reason. I am a democrat! But of the Arkansas persuasion, which is probably too conservative for the West Coast guys. Have they taught you the secret Democrat handshake yet? Or have they let you vote for a dead person yet? My first time after I changed parties was so scary.
parsy, who is curious
You just read them
I’m not claiming a conspiracy by anyone other than the boy marxist.
Has two friends an eight subscribers, he gets more attention here. :)
Nope. There is no credible evidence at all that it's fake. There were a couple of internet crackpots that posted riduculous analyses trying to claim so, but those guys had no expertise and didn't know what they were talking about. Of course that was good enough for birthers, but that's about it.
They do look like they are having fun in the videos.
That’s my whole point. The plaintiff is barking up the wrong tree. The secretary of states are liable. I don’t see any way around it. I won’t accept a sworn statement from some nurse that just might now pop up and say she was in hawaii when he was born. Aint gonna work for me. Documention that is proven legit would satisfy my ‘curiousity’ so to speak. In addition, Alan Keyes has a valid complaint. I wish he would start with his state’s secretary of state...see the results of their vetting. My bet on the vetting, is that it will lead to the dnc, who should also be a defendant. :)
Yep, here too. A bunch of neighbors I didn't know and myself spent
the better part of the morning cutting our way out to Hwy 59.
It was fun, chainsaws and straps and this one lady brought us breakfast.
If the power is out, we all empty our freezers and start cooking.
Here we were powerless for nine days. It was fine.. we coped.
Grilled a lot. Patrolled for non-existant looters using ATVs.
Fun.
And they didn't do that.
Where is that video?
Bullsh*t. I declared it fake the day after they were posted on line.
And like I said, your marxist friends at FactCheck are the only ones claiming its legitimacy, other than the faux CIC.
Hey Parsi still waiting for your free meds from ObamaCrapCare. Go Obama!!!! LoL!
Liable for what? My point was that they didn't break that law. They complied with it. They had no evidence that he was NOT eligible, so they allowed him on the ballot. That's all they were required to do.
Most certainly did, ollie. You might want to take a course in reading comprehension.
So he’s just playing an angle that he discovered before he was president, knowing that if he got in with his birth certifigate, he would be able to fend off legal requests? Or is he just lucky that judges are ruling for him?
Why are these judges backing his case up at every turn?
Somebody should I suppose. Then you can quote the specific portion that authorized them to lie about place of birth. Please do.
That is not a Birth Certificate, it is a COLB.
You can request a Birth Certificate and will have to wait up to 6 weeks to receive it.
Please don’t make me go looking for the Hawaii website and point it out.
We done this one plenty of time.
Unfortunately McLame had his own NBC problems, which he tried to circumvent, through a Sense of the Senate Resolution, which first included Obama, who was inexplicably removed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.