Posted on 10/13/2009 7:45:31 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer personally attacks opposing parties and disrespects the integrity of the judiciary, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judges rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice.
-snip-
Regrettably, the conduct of counsel Orly Taitz has crossed these lines, and Ms. Taitz must be sanctioned for her misconduct. After a full review of the sanctionable conduct, counsels conduct leading up to that conduct, and counsels response to the Courts show cause order, the Court finds that a monetary penalty of $20,000.00 shall be imposed upon counsel Orly Taitz as punishment for her misconduct, as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct, and to protect the integrity of the Court. Payment shall be made to the United States, through the Middle District of Georgia Clerks Office, within thirty days of todays Order. If counsel fails to pay the sanction due, the U.S. Attorney will be authorized to commence collection proceedings.
(Full Order at the link.)
Because O bama's father was not a citizen of the United States, and according to the definition of "natural born citizen" used by the First Congress in 1990 through to Senate resolution SR511 of 2008, a natural born citizen of the United States must have U.S citizen parents.
The evidence that he is not eligible to hold the office is already in the public domain.
To clarify my last post to you, Orly can appeal the sanctions order. She can't appeal the dismissal of the underlying case because she no longer represents Captain Rhodes (she moved to withdraw from representing Rhodes, and that motion was granted).
Due process demands that Judge Land remains unbiased. Anyone reading any of the judge's order can clearly see he's anything but biased and on an agenda. He's also trying to affect the case in front of Judge Carter (which may be an additional reason Judge Carter will not grant Gary Kreep severance).
A judge can and should be disqualified for "bias, a likelihood of bias, or an appearance of bias." Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575, 588, 84 S.Ct. 841, 11 L.Ed.2d 921 (1964) |
Get drunk and act like a fool, then post in on You Tube.
I disagree with gunner on Taitz but not Achmed.
Achmed is funny and dies a lot!
Okay, so then you conceed that your statement that McCain provided "Record after record" of his birth certificate is fake?
As to Obama's other records, can you name any other president who released any of the records you are demanding? As a reminder, you demanded the following:
1) Kindergarden records
2) Vaccination records
3) College records
4) Passport applications
I know of no other president who made any of the above public. Why should Obama?
See post 340.
Then why all the fuss about the birth certificate, college records, kindergarden records, etc?
Personally I am more interested in what is accurate, according to the law, since judges seem to be able to make it up as they go.
I have twisted nothing.
I asked a poster why Joe Biden's parallel documentation wasn't being demanded, and it was suggested that I demand it. I pointed out that I, personally, have no doubts as to Biden's eligibility, to which 'presently no screen name' responded with an 'LOL' and a veiled insult about my intelligence.
Nothing was twisted, nothing was falsified.
And per the request that was made, I have not posted this comment to 'presently no screen name.'
Funny? Whatever floats your boat.
Dang it! I got on the wrong bus again.
Which one is the Bozos Bus?
TRUTH BUMP!!!
After reading his original decision, full of derision, I’m perfectly happy with taitz telling him to shove it up his piehole.
It is nice to have a list. I have suspected each of them individually from time to time but the ping list helps validate my suspicions.
He’s covering for a Donkey @$$ liar ... quack like a duck.
Yeah, but that document only counts as proof of adoption, not proof of birthplace.
I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago...
This is absolutely wrong headed. The proper place is an unbiased court that will decide on the evidence presented.
This Judge full well knows that an impeachment proceeding will never be called by the Democrats in charge of the House, they ar the ones who put him there.
No they have not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.