Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Slippery Slope on Guns (Hurl, you will)
Truthdig / The Washington Post ^ | October 5, 2009 | Marie Cocco

Posted on 10/07/2009 2:04:58 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Whatever significance is attached to Chicago’s failed bid to host the 2016 Olympics, it is of small importance to the rest of the country. More far-reaching and frightening is the Supreme Court’s decision to take up a case challenging the city’s ban on handgun ownership in the court’s new term, which begins this week.

The case is best considered a preview of coming attractions. The gun lobby, if it wins in the Supreme Court, is prepared to challenge every gun control law enacted at any level of government. It will usher in a scary season of assault on the common sense of citizens, law enforcement officials and others who believe that carrying today’s high-powered weapons in an urbanized, mobile—and angry—society is chillingly dangerous, and deadly.

Since the high court last year struck down the District of Columbia’s ban on handgun ownership, gun rights advocates have eagerly awaited a case that would extend the decision to states and localities. Because the District of Columbia is a federal entity, a different case was needed to establish that states and municipalities don’t have the right to impose broad gun restrictions. Chicago has become the test case.

Almost no one expects the conservative-leaning court to uphold Chicago’s prohibition, which applies only to handguns. Owners of rifles used in hunting, for example, are unaffected by the local law.

This distinction says much about the current state of gun politics. Only about a decade ago, gun rights activists often claimed that they wanted their weapons in order to hunt. They would evoke childhood memories of kinship that grew in the woods as one generation of hunters passed an ancient art on to another.

Those arguments seem as quaint now as the assumption that reasonable people do not bring firearms to political events featuring the president..(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at truthdig.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; angrymob; banglist; ccw; congress; marchondc; obama; rkba; scotus; secondamendment; shallnotbeinfringed; teaparty; townhalls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life." - Robert A. Heinlein

We're just doing our part to restore civility to our society.

21 posted on 10/07/2009 2:26:59 PM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
"All they have to do is sneak in a provision declaring gun control by the feds in some innocuous bill such like they’re doing with health care ... guns gone ...."

There would be that messy little task of collecting hundreds of millions of firearms from citizens, though. I predict that won't go well.

22 posted on 10/07/2009 2:31:14 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2 million for Sarah Palin if she runs; What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
SkyDancer wrote:
All they have to do is sneak in a provision declaring gun control by the feds in some innocuous bill such like they’re doing with health care ... guns gone ....

That won’t work. The Heller decision last year did away with that option. In DC v. Heller, SCOTUS ruled that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” as protected in the Second amendment is a right for individuals to keep and bear arms. So any federal law to outlaw individual ownership of firearms would run afoul of the precedent of DC v. Heller.

The case this year involves Chicago. And the main question is one of “incorporation.” That’s the principle that the 14th amendment, the language “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States,"” means that the states can’t violate a person’s second amendment rights. The court in the past has ruled that the first amendment, the fourth amendment, the fifth and sixth amendments all apply to the state due to this language in the 14th amendment. They have never ruled whether that also means that the 2nd Amendment applies to the states.


From the desk of
cc2k:

23 posted on 10/07/2009 2:31:46 PM PDT by cc2k (Are you better off today than you were $4,000,000,000,000 ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

“Ms. Marie Cocco can write at length of her opposition to RKBA without mentioning the second amendment. It’s a unique ability of the Left to ignore facts.”

That’s because the Constitution is irrelevant to the Left. They look upon the United States as just another unfairly rich country for them to “convert” to socialism.

Molon Labe.


24 posted on 10/07/2009 2:36:15 PM PDT by PLMerite (Speak Truth to Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The gun lobby’s potency already has led Congress to abandon the 1990s-era ban on semiautomatic assault weapons, a prohibition that was broadly supported by law enforcement officials.

Actually it was law enforcement politicians which is what most police chiefs and county sherrifs are. As politicians they are MOSTLY risk averse and seek only the preservation of their political life.

25 posted on 10/07/2009 2:37:28 PM PDT by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandWMan
The ruling should look a lot like the Heller ruling if the Supreme Court finds that the Second Amendment is applicable to the states (and local governments).
26 posted on 10/07/2009 2:39:06 PM PDT by PackerBoy (Just my opinion ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Owners of rifles used in hunting, for example, are unaffected by the local law.”

The editors at The Washington Post write this as kinda proof that Chicago recognizes some aspect of the Second Amendment.

News flash to those people: The Second Amendment never was about hunting.


27 posted on 10/07/2009 2:40:58 PM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
All they have to do is sneak in a provision declaring gun control by the feds in some innocuous bill such like they’re doing with health care ... guns gone ....

As much as they desire to take our guns away from us, the real question is can they resist their inner voices and fascist impulses that relentlessly drive them to actually try something as dumb as this. I sincerely hope they don't try it.
28 posted on 10/07/2009 2:41:01 PM PDT by Pox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m trying to guess what is the one thing Barack Insane Obama’s administration will do that will have Americans hold their collective breath as in OMG!


29 posted on 10/07/2009 2:42:47 PM PDT by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pox

I’m trying to guess what is the one thing Barack Insane Obama’s administration will do that will have Americans hold their collective breath as in OMG!


30 posted on 10/07/2009 2:43:29 PM PDT by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland
IMHO Scalia was playing 'possum for THIS case by being the master of restraint in Heller. He understands the Second Amendment and its historical significance.
31 posted on 10/07/2009 2:44:00 PM PDT by PackerBoy (Just my opinion ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: P8riot
In some ways Mr. Heinlein was a guide and maybe a prophet. Take his novel Starship Troopers: In the Terran Federation the rights of a full Citizen (to vote, and hold public office) must be earned through some form of volunteer "military" service. Those residents who have not exercised their right to perform this Federal Service retain the other rights generally associated with a modern democracy (free speech, assembly, etc.), but they cannot vote or hold public office. This structure arose ad hoc after the collapse of the 20th century western democracies, brought on by both social failures at home and military defeat by the Chinese Hegemony overseas. I really like that idea. If it were already enacted here, you'd have never heard of Barack Obama.
32 posted on 10/07/2009 2:48:30 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2 million for Sarah Palin if she runs; What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hey Marie,would you care to hazard a guess which side your fellow Washington Post alum (and anti fellow 2nd Amendment opponent),Carl Rowan,would take in this case?

For that matter,what do you think Rosie O'Donuts' bodyguards might say about this case?????

33 posted on 10/07/2009 2:48:52 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Christian+Veteran=Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland
I believe that men like Scalia are just as subject to the pressures of politics as any member of congress is.

Which is why I believe the WaPo and Slimes are written to reach a few thousand people in and near government power. They make it clear that they want a 5-4 decision that goes their way.

These are people who can send notes, emails, and phone calls to USSC justices, and expect to have them returned. They just have to remind a couple of fence-sitters how the wrong ruling will destroy life as they know it.

34 posted on 10/07/2009 2:55:03 PM PDT by 300winmag (Zero to abject failure in under a month. A new land speed record!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Marie Cocco can thank America’s civilian marksmen, who became the brilliant shooters of the European and Pacific theaters during World War II, that she’s got the freedom to blather on in English, rather than doing hard time in a German or Japanese penal colony. Clearly, she’s an empty-headed idiot.


35 posted on 10/07/2009 2:59:16 PM PDT by Jack Hammer (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
...in an urbanized, mobile—and angry but eminently polite—society...

There. Fixed it.

36 posted on 10/07/2009 3:01:44 PM PDT by OpeEdMunkey (Eat right...exercise...die anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

BLOAT


37 posted on 10/07/2009 3:02:43 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead. Bonus tag line: FAIL 246, Obama 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We are simply reaching the point of irreconcileable differences on a host of critical issues in this nation. Dictatorship, dissolution, civil war are the only likely results. I advocate none of these - I am just doing the math.

I just don’t see the Constitution fairy coming in and restoring liberty. Not with the domestic enemies in the positions they hold.


38 posted on 10/07/2009 3:02:57 PM PDT by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
The "Jesusland" (Red) and "United States of Canada" (Blue) that some wag offered up after Kerry's loss works for me:
39 posted on 10/07/2009 3:10:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2 million for Sarah Palin if she runs; What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
Chicago will be depopulated as the gun war of all against all consumes the City and daily sweeps must begin to collect the bodies from the sidewalks.

Yeah...that's never happened before.

Al Capone

40 posted on 10/07/2009 3:13:22 PM PDT by OpeEdMunkey (Eat right...exercise...die anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson