Skip to comments.
Get away from her you b#%$@ - the Power Loader suit to become a reality
Gizmag.com ^
| 10/04/09
| Darren Quick
Posted on 10/05/2009 6:50:13 AM PDT by Reaganesque
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last

Science fiction becomes a reality. Kinda figures though. When I first saw "Aliens," the power lifter seemed to make a lot of sense and I wondered why such a thing didn't exist. Leave it to the Japanese to bring it to reality. Next stop: real Gundam style battle-bots!
To: Reaganesque
Nice. A human forklift...The “ForkYou”.
2
posted on
10/05/2009 6:53:55 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: Reaganesque
There is a video as well at the link.
To: Reaganesque
You know the military will be interested
4
posted on
10/05/2009 6:55:21 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(California : bankrupt ideas from bankrupt people from a bankrupt state now bankrupting America)
To: Reaganesque
Useless without load-bearing legs.
The arms can lift a ton? Good, but human legs can’t support it.
5
posted on
10/05/2009 6:57:08 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The best aid we could ever give Africa would be thousands of rifles to throw out their own dictators)
To: Reaganesque
Augmented worksuits as a concept are much older than that movie.
6
posted on
10/05/2009 6:59:02 AM PDT
by
ltc8k6
To: wastedyears
It does have legs. Watch the video.
To: Reaganesque
Let me know when they start building Mechwarriors.
8
posted on
10/05/2009 7:01:56 AM PDT
by
EricT.
("Mankind, when left to themselves, are unfit for their own government." -George Washington)
To: Reaganesque
But will it be useful for groping someone on a crowded Japanese subway?
9
posted on
10/05/2009 7:02:58 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Rio: Gold / Madrid: Silver / Tokyo: Bronze / Obama: Lead weight.)
To: Reaganesque
The US military has one that is way better already.
10
posted on
10/05/2009 7:03:45 AM PDT
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: EricT.
To: KarlInOhio
“But will it be useful for groping someone on a crowded Japanese subway? “
Yes. But only once!
12
posted on
10/05/2009 7:05:34 AM PDT
by
mark3681
To: Reaganesque
If they can perfect the manipular action to allow finer control, myriads of nurses will bless the use of these devices to help with the turning and bathing of very heavy patients!(as well as assisting with agressive Physical therapy which often gets deferred to the point of neglect)
To: wastedyears
That’s what I noticed.
So what if the arms can lift 100 kg - all the weight is still on human shoulders, back, and legs.
14
posted on
10/05/2009 7:08:28 AM PDT
by
MrB
(Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
To: EricT.
I never have understood why giant robots would ever beat a good tank. Lots of moving parts and thin sections mean that the arms and legs can't be very heavily armored. A lot of height means that it is very visible at the same time people want to make tanks shorter to hide better. Also the small size of the feet compared to the overall size means that ground pressure will be much higher on the robot than the tank. You better not be fighting on anything other than concrete or late August midwest soil - during Spring it would quickly sink down to its waist in mud.
[And no, I didn't spend far too much time watching anime in my youth :-) ]
15
posted on
10/05/2009 7:09:46 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Rio: Gold / Madrid: Silver / Tokyo: Bronze / Obama: Lead weight.)
To: Reaganesque
Anyone remember the PADD, Star Trek TNG's Personal Access Display Device", the little I/O data gadget carried like a clipboard on board the Enterprise D? Look at today's PDA's, mini-laptops mainly for Internet data, and the rapidly expanding IPhone-style cell phone. (Or for that matter, the re-mapping touch sensitive control panels that today more and more are in banks and fast-food places.) The "isn't that a cool idea" device of SF always predates the actual enginhttp://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/PADDeered, real-world tool!
The PADD
16
posted on
10/05/2009 7:22:01 AM PDT
by
50sDad
(The Left cannot understand life is not in a test tube. Raise taxes, & jobs go away.)
To: Reaganesque
“Lt. John Rico, please report to Armoring.”
17
posted on
10/05/2009 7:24:31 AM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(Member of AARP - Armed And Really Pi$$ED!)
To: Reaganesque
When I saw it in the movie, I thought the same thing. I thought maybe we did have one of those things already or that somebody was at least working on it.
18
posted on
10/05/2009 7:29:18 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(I don't remember Americans being called "racists" when we fought against Hillarycare.)
To: KarlInOhio
I believe that real Mechs are a pipedream: but there’s certainly room for Powered Armor, which is more what this article is about.
But considering Mechs a moment: the handwave might be that these giant MechWarriors (or whatever) have room for a Fusion Reactor, and that their shape is therefore optimal for heat dissipation.
All that power for transmission, all that surface area for dissipation, some clever stabilization and suddenly you have a 50 tonne monster running at 150 mph (!)
I guess Mech-enthusiasts could also argue that the legs are indeed relatively weakly armored, but they’re also losable: if you have six of them then you can potentially lose three before falling over - that’s three tank-killing hits that only slowed you down. And being able to make a pop-up attack from behind a house is pretty cool :0)
To: Reaganesque
Center of balance is all wrong.
Anything over a couple of hundred pounds would cause Ripley to fall forward.
20
posted on
10/05/2009 7:31:23 AM PDT
by
kidd
(Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson