Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Get away from her you b#%$@ - the Power Loader suit to become a reality
Gizmag.com ^ | 10/04/09 | Darren Quick

Posted on 10/05/2009 6:50:13 AM PDT by Reaganesque

Science-fiction is well on the way to becoming science fact with engineers from Activelink, a Kyoto-based subsidiary of Panasonic, developing an exoskeleton suit inspired by the "Power Loader" suit Ripley wore in her climactic battle with the Queen Alien in Aliens. And, just like in the movie, the Power Loader suit is designed to give its wearer superhuman strength for the lifting of heavy objects – in the movie it was cargo, but Activelink also has construction and disaster relief operations in its sights.

The suit is constructed from an aluminum-alloy frame and weighs 230kg (507 lbs). Similar to the Robot Suit Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) we looked at earlier this year, the current version of the new suit contains 18 electromagnetic motors, which are controlled by components that measure the direction and magnitude of the force applied by the human operator. These motors allow the human operator to easily lift loads of 100kg (220 lbs), and the control system also provides force feedback to directly feel the behavior of the suit. Activelink says this allows the user to establish a correspondence between his own operation and the movement of the robot.

The Power Loader suit is currently in development, but Activelink has plans to release a version of the robot suit to the market by the 2015.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: alien; loader; power; reality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Science fiction becomes a reality. Kinda figures though. When I first saw "Aliens," the power lifter seemed to make a lot of sense and I wondered why such a thing didn't exist. Leave it to the Japanese to bring it to reality. Next stop: real Gundam style battle-bots!

1 posted on 10/05/2009 6:50:14 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Nice. A human forklift...The “ForkYou”.


2 posted on 10/05/2009 6:53:55 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

There is a video as well at the link.


3 posted on 10/05/2009 6:54:08 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

You know the military will be interested


4 posted on 10/05/2009 6:55:21 AM PDT by GeronL (California : bankrupt ideas from bankrupt people from a bankrupt state now bankrupting America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Useless without load-bearing legs.

The arms can lift a ton? Good, but human legs can’t support it.


5 posted on 10/05/2009 6:57:08 AM PDT by wastedyears (The best aid we could ever give Africa would be thousands of rifles to throw out their own dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Augmented worksuits as a concept are much older than that movie.


6 posted on 10/05/2009 6:59:02 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

It does have legs. Watch the video.


7 posted on 10/05/2009 6:59:54 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Let me know when they start building Mechwarriors.


8 posted on 10/05/2009 7:01:56 AM PDT by EricT. ("Mankind, when left to themselves, are unfit for their own government." -George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
But will it be useful for groping someone on a crowded Japanese subway?
9 posted on 10/05/2009 7:02:58 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Rio: Gold / Madrid: Silver / Tokyo: Bronze / Obama: Lead weight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
The US military has one that is way better already.


10 posted on 10/05/2009 7:03:45 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EricT.

Its a matter of time...


11 posted on 10/05/2009 7:04:15 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

“But will it be useful for groping someone on a crowded Japanese subway? “

Yes. But only once!


12 posted on 10/05/2009 7:05:34 AM PDT by mark3681
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

If they can perfect the manipular action to allow finer control, myriads of nurses will bless the use of these devices to help with the turning and bathing of very heavy patients!(as well as assisting with agressive Physical therapy which often gets deferred to the point of neglect)


13 posted on 10/05/2009 7:05:40 AM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

That’s what I noticed.

So what if the arms can lift 100 kg - all the weight is still on human shoulders, back, and legs.


14 posted on 10/05/2009 7:08:28 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EricT.
I never have understood why giant robots would ever beat a good tank. Lots of moving parts and thin sections mean that the arms and legs can't be very heavily armored. A lot of height means that it is very visible at the same time people want to make tanks shorter to hide better. Also the small size of the feet compared to the overall size means that ground pressure will be much higher on the robot than the tank. You better not be fighting on anything other than concrete or late August midwest soil - during Spring it would quickly sink down to its waist in mud.

[And no, I didn't spend far too much time watching anime in my youth :-) ]

15 posted on 10/05/2009 7:09:46 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Rio: Gold / Madrid: Silver / Tokyo: Bronze / Obama: Lead weight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Anyone remember the PADD, Star Trek TNG's Personal Access Display Device", the little I/O data gadget carried like a clipboard on board the Enterprise D? Look at today's PDA's, mini-laptops mainly for Internet data, and the rapidly expanding IPhone-style cell phone. (Or for that matter, the re-mapping touch sensitive control panels that today more and more are in banks and fast-food places.) The "isn't that a cool idea" device of SF always predates the actual enginhttp://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/PADDeered, real-world tool!

The PADD

16 posted on 10/05/2009 7:22:01 AM PDT by 50sDad (The Left cannot understand life is not in a test tube. Raise taxes, & jobs go away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

“Lt. John Rico, please report to Armoring.”


17 posted on 10/05/2009 7:24:31 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (Member of AARP - Armed And Really Pi$$ED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

When I saw it in the movie, I thought the same thing. I thought maybe we did have one of those things already or that somebody was at least working on it.


18 posted on 10/05/2009 7:29:18 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I don't remember Americans being called "racists" when we fought against Hillarycare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I believe that real Mechs are a pipedream: but there’s certainly room for Powered Armor, which is more what this article is about.

But considering Mechs a moment: the handwave might be that these giant MechWarriors (or whatever) have room for a Fusion Reactor, and that their shape is therefore optimal for heat dissipation.

All that power for transmission, all that surface area for dissipation, some clever stabilization and suddenly you have a 50 tonne monster running at 150 mph (!)

I guess Mech-enthusiasts could also argue that the legs are indeed relatively weakly armored, but they’re also losable: if you have six of them then you can potentially lose three before falling over - that’s three tank-killing hits that only slowed you down. And being able to make a pop-up attack from behind a house is pretty cool :0)


19 posted on 10/05/2009 7:31:02 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Center of balance is all wrong.

Anything over a couple of hundred pounds would cause Ripley to fall forward.


20 posted on 10/05/2009 7:31:23 AM PDT by kidd (Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson