Skip to comments.
Egypt anger over virginity faking
BBC ^
| 9/28/09
| Magdi Abdelhadi
Posted on 09/29/2009 10:02:41 AM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: TexasFreeper2009
You aren’t seriously comparing women that aren’t virgins, to porn stars, are you? That’s a pretty good stretch even for FR.
41
posted on
09/29/2009 11:19:23 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
(If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
To: Taffini
Or even learning something new!!
42
posted on
09/29/2009 11:21:13 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
(If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
To: LibWhacker
You people from the other side of the pond are just a hoot.
43
posted on
09/29/2009 11:22:15 AM PDT
by
gathersnomoss
(General George Patton had it right.)
To: stuartcr
you said “To me, having had sex does not mean impurity, unrighteousness or any of that stuff”
so using your reasoning, there would be nothing stopping you from marrying a porn star since she has done nothing impure or unrighteous.
44
posted on
09/29/2009 11:22:19 AM PDT
by
TexasFreeper2009
(Obama lied, the economy died)
To: stuartcr
“stretch”....humor Ha, Ha.
45
posted on
09/29/2009 11:24:06 AM PDT
by
gathersnomoss
(General George Patton had it right.)
To: stuartcr
From their perspective (which isn’t much different than the general views held in the West until a little while ago), a woman who engages in sex outside of marriage is not very different than a prostitute. How many men would line up to marry a prostitute?
To: TexasFreeper2009
And if you say someone being a porn star or a prostitute would stop you from marrying them... then what exactly is the problem is it the number of partners they have had? and if that is the problem then what is the difference between your arbatrary # that is acceptable and a husband wanting that # to be zero?
47
posted on
09/29/2009 11:26:05 AM PDT
by
TexasFreeper2009
(Obama lied, the economy died)
To: stuartcr
I wonder if these men were virgins when they got married?
48
posted on
09/29/2009 11:26:25 AM PDT
by
Taffini
( Mr. Pippen and Mr. Waffles do not approve)
To: TexasFreeper2009
There is an “imprinting” that goes on with one’s first partner, both for men and women. This is a God-given bonding reaction. This is why the “puritanical idea” of being a virgin at marriage and not committing adultery is actually a good idea, if you want to stay married and have the best possible sexual experiences.
49
posted on
09/29/2009 11:29:23 AM PDT
by
MrB
(Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
To: TexasFreeper2009
Not if I was in love with her, no.
50
posted on
09/29/2009 11:31:27 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
(If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
To: MrB
I actually agree with that.
I also believe that people seem to lose a piece of themselves with every partner that they have. If you have ever seen a old hooker she usually looks 20 to 30 years older, it's as if each new partner took part of her life away.
51
posted on
09/29/2009 11:32:59 AM PDT
by
TexasFreeper2009
(Obama lied, the economy died)
To: Boogieman
I guess, since I do not have the same perspectives as them, that is why I don’t understand it.
52
posted on
09/29/2009 11:33:19 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
(If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
To: Taffini
53
posted on
09/29/2009 11:33:54 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
(If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
To: TexasFreeper2009
Ever meet an old girlfriend at a class reunion or something and realize you left a part of your heart there, regardless of your level of “physical involvement”?
I heard one guy say he realized that when he saw his “girlfriend” that he had at 5 yrs old - she had a small piece of his heart.
54
posted on
09/29/2009 11:36:53 AM PDT
by
MrB
(Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
To: stuartcr
well I will give you credit for being consistent.
But the vast majority of people would never marry a prostitute or a porn star even though many wouldn't expect their bride to be a virgin.
Nearly everyone has what they think is an “acceptable” number of partners they would accept in a possible mate.
55
posted on
09/29/2009 11:40:34 AM PDT
by
TexasFreeper2009
(Obama lied, the economy died)
To: MrB
Actually I have, and it is sort of sad.
56
posted on
09/29/2009 11:42:51 AM PDT
by
TexasFreeper2009
(Obama lied, the economy died)
To: Taffini
I wonder if these men were virgins when they got married?It depends. Do goats count?
57
posted on
09/29/2009 11:44:01 AM PDT
by
OB1kNOb
(There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: Soap, ballot, jury, & ammo. Use in that order.)
To: OB1kNOb
58
posted on
09/29/2009 12:00:33 PM PDT
by
Taffini
( Mr. Pippen and Mr. Waffles do not approve)
To: TexasFreeper2009
Why wouldn’t I be consistent?
59
posted on
09/29/2009 12:10:45 PM PDT
by
stuartcr
(If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
To: stuartcr
The vast majority of people in America are 100% fine with their wife not being a virgin, but they wouldn't even consider marrying a prostitute or porn star.
They are the ones that are not being consistent.
Either sex matters or it doesn't.
To me there is no difference between someone saying they wouldn't marry a slut who had slept with more than 10 guys than saying they wouldn't marry someone who had slept with anyone.
The principle is the same, only the number tolerated differs.
60
posted on
09/29/2009 12:19:53 PM PDT
by
TexasFreeper2009
(Obama lied, the economy died)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson