Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McChrystal to resign if not given resources for Afghanistan
Threat Matrix ^ | 09-22-09 | Bill Roggio

Posted on 09/22/2009 7:47:30 AM PDT by CWW

McChrystal to resign if not given resources for Afghanistan

By Bill RoggioSeptember 21, 2009 4:17 PM

Within 24 hours of the leak of the Afghanistan assessment to The Washington Post, General Stanley McChrystal's team fired its second shot across the bow of the Obama administration. According to McClatchy, military officers close to General McChrystal said he is prepared to resign if he isn't given sufficient resources (read "troops") to implement a change of direction in Afghanistan:

Adding to the frustration, according to officials in Kabul and Washington, are White House and Pentagon directives made over the last six weeks that Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. military commander in Afghanistan, not submit his request for as many as 45,000 additional troops because the administration isn't ready for it.

In the last two weeks, top administration leaders have suggested that more American troops will be sent to Afghanistan, and then called that suggestion "premature." Earlier this month, Adm. Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that "time is not on our side"; on Thursday, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates urged the public "to take a deep breath."

...

In Kabul, some members of McChrystal's staff said they don't understand why Obama called Afghanistan a "war of necessity" but still hasn't given them the resources they need to turn things around quickly.

Three officers at the Pentagon and in Kabul told McClatchy that the McChrystal they know would resign before he'd stand behind a faltering policy that he thought would endanger his forces or the strategy.

"Yes, he'll be a good soldier, but he will only go so far," a senior official in Kabul said. "He'll hold his ground. He's not going to bend to political pressure."

On Thursday, Gates danced around the question of when the administration would be ready to receive McChrystal's request, which was completed in late August. "We're working through the process by which we want that submitted," he said.

The entire process followed by the military in implementing a change of course in Afghanistan is far different, and bizarrely so, from the process it followed in changing strategy in Iraq.

For Afghanistan, the process to decide on a course change began in March of this year, when Bruce Reidel was tasked to assess the situation. This produced the much-heralded yet vague "AfPak" assessment. Then, in May, General David McKiernan was fired and replaced by General McChrystal, who took command in June. General McChrystal's assessment hit President Obama's desk at the end of August, almost three months after he took command. And yet now in the last half of September, the decision on additional forces has yet to be submitted to the administration.

Contrast this with Iraq in the fall of 2006. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was fired just one day after the elections in early November. The Keane-Kagan plan for Iraq was submitted to President Bush shortly afterward, and encompassed both the assessment of the situation and the recommended course of action, including the recommended number of troops to be deployed to deal with the situation. General David Petraeus replaced General George Casey in early February 2007, and hit the ground running; the surge strategy was in place, troops were being mustered to deploy to Iraq, and commanders on the ground were preparing for and executing the new orders. The first of the surge units began to arrive in Iraq only weeks later, in March.

Today, the military is perceiving that the administration is punting the question of a troop increase in Afghanistan, and the military is even questioning the administration's commitment to succeed in Afghanistan. The leaking of the assessment and the report that McChrystal would resign if he is not given what is needed to succeed constitute some very public pushback against the administration's waffling on Afghanistan.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: afganistan; bho44; bhodod; mccrystal; mhmmdnsm09222009; military; nsp; nss; obama; oef; oefsurge; resign; roggio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-304 next last
To: RabidBartender

That may have the sad effect of putting a boob in charge of real war, meaning more of our fellows will get killed. Damn those who tolerate this usurper in office a single day longer!


21 posted on 09/22/2009 7:54:48 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CWW

I hope he stays and fights for OUR MEN and WOMEN. We need someone too!
God Bless


22 posted on 09/22/2009 7:56:54 AM PDT by blueyon (It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Obama won’t care. Whatever it takes to dismantle American and Western Civ., he is willing to do. The General is just an expendable cog in the machinery of state for the good of the state.


23 posted on 09/22/2009 7:57:07 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (It's us against them...the Establishment RINOs vs rank and file...Sarah Palin or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CWW

This hasn’t been confirmed yet- but it raises all kinds of questions.


24 posted on 09/22/2009 7:57:21 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW

OK, so Obama’s gonna throw in the towel in Afghanistan, Al Quaeda and the Taliban will celebrate their great victory over “The Great Satan”, and jihadis the world over will be inspired to begin their final assault on western civilization... great.


25 posted on 09/22/2009 7:57:38 AM PDT by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW

Lets see. Zero has pissed off the CIA and the military. Not good to have those two entities as your enemy while you’re trying to destroy the country.


26 posted on 09/22/2009 7:57:38 AM PDT by Overtaxed Patriot (Liberals are terrible at math.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
How does a general resign?

This general wants to win or be fired.

Situation is like MacArthur's in Korea, and that mess still goes on.

27 posted on 09/22/2009 7:58:00 AM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus
I don't know about General Patraeus, but be careful about military men becoming politicians. Many times the wind up being hawkish socialists...strong on national defense, but very liberal on social issues...better than the satus quo, but not what I would want.

Need much more input on Patraeus before I will support him.......$0.02
28 posted on 09/22/2009 7:58:49 AM PDT by Sudetenland (Slow to anger but terrible in vengence...such is the character of the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
OK, so Obama’s gonna throw in the towel in Afghanistan, Al Quaeda and the Taliban will celebrate their great victory over “The Great Satan”, and jihadis the world over will be inspired to begin their final assault on western civilization... great.

Starting with the 50,000 who will converge in D.C. in a few days.
29 posted on 09/22/2009 7:59:01 AM PDT by Overtaxed Patriot (Liberals are terrible at math.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CWW

yeah he has a pair for standing up...... but he didn’t get to where he is in life by quitting.

You don’t quit. EVER.


30 posted on 09/22/2009 7:59:30 AM PDT by envisio (Wanna understand all the problems with this country? Google "Kanye West".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

Interesting comparison.


31 posted on 09/22/2009 7:59:33 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild

32 posted on 09/22/2009 7:59:55 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CWW

***In Kabul, some members of McChrystal’s staff said they don’t understand why Obama called Afghanistan a “war of necessity” but still hasn’t given them the resources they need to turn things around quickly.***

It’s really quite simple. Zero has no clue what he’s doing. Our enemies are just biding their time - they know it will be easy when they have everything in order.


33 posted on 09/22/2009 8:00:57 AM PDT by nanetteclaret (Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

I liken it more akin to Clinton and Somalia.


34 posted on 09/22/2009 8:01:34 AM PDT by RabidBartender (I will work harder, Napoleon is always right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CWW

Van Jones is coming back...


35 posted on 09/22/2009 8:01:34 AM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW

Makes me proud to be an Army vet.


36 posted on 09/22/2009 8:01:53 AM PDT by jwalsh07 (Ask not what you can do for your country, ask what you can do for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW

Every thing falls apart and obama says don’t worry be happy.............what a mess.


37 posted on 09/22/2009 8:02:37 AM PDT by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
I doubt three months ago he never heard of the place. He is the guy O appointed and I assume he did so because McChrystal told him he could do the job.

From the tone of your post it's pretty evident you have never been in the military. If you are saying that General McChrystal had never heard of the place three months ago...now that is just flat a dumb statement!

38 posted on 09/22/2009 8:02:38 AM PDT by RVN Airplane Driver ("To be born into freedom is an accident; to die in freedom is an obligation..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CWW

bttt


39 posted on 09/22/2009 8:03:16 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton

Maybe the opposite. After all, an American “loss” in Afganistan is a “win” for the muzzie POTUS


40 posted on 09/22/2009 8:03:19 AM PDT by atc23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-304 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson