Agenda 21, Secular Humanism, and the Animalization of Americans

The murderous secular humanist religions of Communism and Nazism were spawned by the anti-God/utopian tradition of Revolutionary France. The Black Book of Communism, an 800- page compendium of the crimes of Communist regimes worldwide, graphically details the terror, torture, man-made famine, mass deportations, starvation, and massacres undertaken on behalf of revolutionary utopian ideals. The reality of Communism, which claimed to be an emissary of the Enlightenment, of universal brotherhood, and of happiness for all as envisioned by Gracchus Babeuf, turned out to be not only a sadistic engine for unimaginable evil but also the creator of hells on earth.

The book’s authors point to Communism’s “biological and zoological strain of thinking” as the engine of evil that proved itself to be a most effective means of denying the humanity of Communism’s millions of victims. “This strain of thinking,” explained Stephane Courtois, “is why so many of the crimes of Communism were crimes against humanity, and how Marxist-Leninist ideology managed to justify these crimes to its followers.” (The Black Book of Communism, p. 751)

Biocentrism or ecocentrism, terms synonymous with today’s sustainable development/global warming crowd, is the “biological and zoological strain of thinking” in disguise. Biocentrism is antithetical to America ’s Judeo-Christian worldview in that it not only reduces man to a soulless ape, but makes his life less valuable than cockroaches, earthworms, spotted owls, trash fish, grizzlies, alligators, and wolves. Those who trace the genesis of ideas, such as Donald Worster, point to Charles Darwin as the most important spokesman for the biocentrism attitude. In short, Darwin ’s theory of evolution, the malignant heart of biocentrism, leads to contempt and even hatred towards humanity.

“Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.” (Earth First! Journal editor, John Daily)

“To feed a starving child is to exacerbate the world population problem.” (Yale professor Lamont Cole)

Biocentrism and its morally-warped system of philosophy and morality thrive right here in America . Communism (multiculturalism/ Cultural Marxism) and its diabolical mother, Secular Humanism, plus its twisted sisters, Postmodernism and Cosmic Humanism (New Age global warming crowd) are now the predominant way of thinking in most of America’s power centers. At the heart of each of these systems beats the black heart of Darwinian biocentrism.

Dr. James Dobson notes, “The Secular Humanist system....has outstripped Judeo- Christian precepts in the universities.... judiciary.... federal bureaucracy, in business, medicine, law, psychology, sociology....arts, in many public schools, and to be sure, in the halls of Congress.” (Understanding the Times, David A. Noebel, p. 7)

Every day in our public schools, America’s children are “animalized” through the teaching of Darwinian evolutionary propaganda. Though some are able to resist this dehumanizing spiritual attack, many more are not. Of those who cannot, some will go on to join the ranks of anti-God, anti-America, anti-human revolutionaries, thereby becoming accomplices in the destruction of the nation that nourishes and protects them. Others will become practical atheists who, having no faith in God, will not fight for a nation founded on Judeo-Christian precepts. From a secular humanist point of view, these are desired outcomes because:

“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States.” (Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund)

These things are occurring because for nearly two centuries Secular Humanists and revolutionary fellow travelers - having infiltrated and taken control of this nation’s education establishment - incrementally replaced our nation’s founding Judeo-Christian moral and philosophical worldview and history with a revolutionary catechism. The effect of this has been to not only undermine and delegitimize our nation’s traditional ideas and institutions but to also reverse and upend the natural order, all of which is leading to the destruction of our civilization.

“To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.” (Alexander Solzhenitsyn)

Teaching to this nation’s future leaders, jurists, lawmakers, government workers, teachers, etc., the ideas and philosophies of men and women such as Comte, Marx, Malthus, de Sade, Rousseau, Reich, Freud, Darwin, Nietzsche, Lenin, Stalin, Heidegger, Adorno, Lukacs, Gramsci, Sanger, Marcuse, Dewey, Kinsey, Derrida, and Foucault, for example, has unleashed a devastating wave of corruption, debauchery, political correctness, chaos, pathologies, crime, narcissism, raw powergrabbing, and abandonment of allegiance towards these United States of America, all of which paves the way for the rise of a socialistic, sustainably developed New World Order.

An alternative power structure necessary for deconstructing our Constitutional Republic has been created. This “shadow government” of interlocking relationships and mutually reinforcing agendas consists of, for example, the New Left, the Democratic machine, environmental organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club, Audubon Society, and The Wildlife Federation; big money foundations, such as Heinz, Mott, Blue Moon, Turner, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund; federal and state fish and wildlife departments, and of course, the United Nations. In hot pursuit of their North American Union project, the power and money hungry Transnational Right aids and abets the destructive process.

With the exception of the dissident voices of “intolerant, racist/haters” like Christians and other true Conservatives, the majority of Americans have passively acquiesced to being told that they are mindless, soulless apes. They also allow their children to be animalized and even told that as apes, they share a common heritage with earthworms. In light of this, the following question bears asking: Why should anyone, let alone the narcissists who are busily deconstructing our nation, respect and serve such a people?

If Antonio Gramsci were alive, he would be gratified by how well his plan for the slow and gradual destruction of America from the inside is working.

Agenda 21 was adopted at the 1992 UN Conference in Rio de Janeiro. This 300-page document contains 40 chapters loaded with recommendations to micro-manage virtually every facet of human existence. Agenda 21 is not a treaty but a “soft-law” policy document that does not require Senate ratification. Some of the key players involved in its production and adoption are Al Gore, Ted Turner, and Maurice Strong. President George H.W. Bush signed it and President Clinton issued Executive Order No. 12852, which created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development.

In his, “Sustainable Development: Transforming America,” Henry Lamb provides us with a vignette of the emerging utopia. Speaking only of America, he says:

“Half the land area of the entire country will be designated ‘wilderness areas’ where only wildlife managers and researchers will be allowed. These areas will be interconnected by ‘corridors of wilderness’ to allow migration of wildlife… Wolves will be as plentiful in Virginia and Pennsylvania as they are now in Idaho and Montana . Panthers and alligators will roam freely from the Everglades to the Okefenokee and beyond.... Transportation between sustainable communities (islands of human habitation)....will be primarily by light rail systems....highways that remain will be super transport corridors, such as the “Trans- Texas Corridor” now being designed....” (Ecologic Special Report, Dec. 1, 2005)

“The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If “Thou shalt not covet,” and “Thou shalt not steal,” were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society, before it can be civilized or made free.”(John Adams, The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States, Charles Francis Adams, Ed., Vol. VI, p.9)

The Wildlands Project, written by Dr. Reed Noss, who is under contract with The Nature Conservancy, is one such scheme. It has never been debated or voted on by elected officials. Nevertheless, it is being implemented through backdoor initiatives. Through its use thus far, 106.5 million acres have been acquired by being designated as wilderness since 1964.

Henry Lamb reports that not only is eminent domain a key “land-taking” strategy but:

“In the West, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management are driving ranchers off the land by reducing grazing allotments…people who have recreational cabins on federal land, are discovering that their permits are not being renewed. The Fish and Wildlife Service is forcing people off their land through designations of “wetlands,” and “critical habitat”....” (Lamb, op. cit.)

The biocentric Endangered Species Act makes use of spotted owls, plants, trash fish, alligators, grizzlies, wolves, and more to run people off their land. Within the space of one week in 2006, three young Florida women were attacked by so-called “managed” alligators. All three women died gruesome deaths. “Managed” wolves are likewise useful for terrorizing landowners, especially when said owners have been criminally deprived of the basic right of self defense.

An article entitled, “Wolf Management Program Actions Show Children are Expendable,” in the Wolfcrossing blog speaks of the outrage, despair, and sense of helplessness felt by landowners handcuffed by politically correct Department of Fish and Wildlife regulations that elevate the welfare of wolves over that of people, thus leaving them helpless in the face of marauding wolves.

Sister Flash writes, “Recently a little boy was encircled by Mexican wolves....the Luna pack circled him for more than five minutes.” One month later, wrote Sister Flash, the pack attacked a family dog as it followed its 8-year old owner (a girl) who was going to feed the family's horses. Thirty days later, “the (same) little girl’s beautiful black quarter horse (Six) was trapped in his corral and brutally slaughtered by the same wolves.... (More recently) a small dog named Maggie was attacked protecting her child’s play yard, right off the front porch....” (http://wolfcrossing.org/blog/? p=235)

Not only have the wolves not been removed, but the notorious alpha male - who had been relocated from Arizona to New Mexico for hanging around a schoolyard in Blue, AZ - has been declared “no longer a threat,” by the complicit New Mexico Department of Game and Fish.

“In the beginning, God created....” is the core presupposition on which Western civilization advanced for more than two millennia. Its highest expression is in our Declaration of Independence, where it serves as the ultimate source of our unalienable rights. This presupposition is condemned by most western policy makers and by the UN, all of whom prefer the biocentric view:

“Human happiness, and....fecundity, are not as important as a wild and healthy planet....until such time as homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.” (David Graber, research biologist with the National Park Service)

“....Christianity (has set) humans apart from nature (and) converted the world into a warehouse of commodities for human enjoyment.” (Global Biodiversity Assessment, p. 787)

In a chilling portent of things to come, M. Macnab, a respondent to the Wolfcrossing article, spoke to all Americans when she warned:

“We here in ‘wolf recovery territory’ know all to well what horrible encroachments on our rights can occur when state and federal officials violate their true purpose. Life without basic rights to protecting one’s family and property is not at all pleasant and this careless and lawless disregard for others welfare will, if not checked…become the standard for all.”

Not “Bible codes” again!

Or in your case “Torah codes”.

Because anybody who thinks there is a “code” in the New Testament is a loon - because you do not think the New Testament is a Revelation from God.

But if someone uses the exact same methodology on the Torah, well then that person is a genius!

Not “Bible codes” again!
Or in your case “Torah codes”.
Because anybody who thinks there is a “code” in the New Testament is a loon - because you do not think the New Testament is a Revelation from God.

But if someone uses the exact same methodology on the Torah, well then that person is a genius!

Kinda like you despise people who ignore science when it comes to creation but you yourself ignore it when it comes to people being born without fathers or coming back to life again after they have died.

As for Vilna Ga'on, he was no loon. And he was no mystical fanatic. He was a rationalist.

People who can't read Hebrew and look at the alleged codes for themselves cannot have a legitimate opinion on the issue, since all they can do is go by what other people say. When you learn Biblical Hebrew and take a look at the graphs we'll talk. Until then . . . buh-by.

A rationalist who thinks that every bit of information about the universe that had ever happened or would ever happen is contained in “codes” within the Torah? (but definitely NOT the New Testament)

You obviously have a different definition of ‘rationalist’ than most.

BFD. None of what you did in those operations can hold a candle to even Marine Corps Basic, let alone to what we do in the heat of battle.

And as I said in the quote you cited, the Islamo-Commie alliance extends all the way to the upper echelons of Al-Qaeda, as evidenced by the fact that their #2 man has been fingered as a KGB agent. And since you bring up Saddam Hussein, anyone with even a modicum of knowledge about his political ideology would know that Saddam was a secular socialist and enemy of the United States, whose entire military, intelligence and secret police apparatus was set up by the Soviet KGB.

You are an apologist for Islamic extremism.

Your twisted motivation apparently being the irrational desire to blame any and all evils of this earth on your most hated ideological foe - a scientific theory.

Well kooky creationists of a feather flock together, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised when you agree with a Islamic Creationists website that 9-11 is the fault of belief in evolution.

"And since you bring up Saddam Hussein, anyone with even a modicum of knowledge about his political ideology would know that Saddam was a secular socialist and enemy of the United States, whose entire military, intelligence and secret police apparatus was set up by the Soviet KGB."

Not to mention that Saddam Hussein admired Stalin (right down to the mustache) and modeled himself after that dictator.

Apparently, you failed to catch that I said that it is good that the Islamic Creation sites denounce terrorism carried out in the name of Islam, I also made it clear that they paint with an overbroad brush.

You are a liar for Darwin, who was in turn a liar for the father of all lies. Indeed, now that I look back on all your posts, I’m starting to think that you probably already know that.

So now I worship Satan, Gutless? Well that is no more delusional that a host of your other wack job beliefs.

Everything I said about you being an apologist for radical Islam is 100% true. You make common cause with the Islamists because they believe like you do.

Those Islamic creationist that you idolize blame 9-11 on belief in evolution, and you agree.

When will you just give it up and convert to Islam? They seem far more in line with your belief set than Christianity.

But why do you condemn creationism in the first place if you're going to believe in virgin births and dead people coming back to life? Science says these things are impossibilities, and if you are telling science to shut up and butt out of these areas, then you are no better. In fact, you're worse, because you're a hypocrite.

PWND

You don't have to worship Satan to tell lies that benefit the kingdom that he is trying to erect on this earth. And you are the one who have become an apologist for the Islamo-Commie alliance by refusing to acknowledge the same. Like I said, you would do well to read some of the standard CONSERVATIVE works on the subject. But I know you won't, because they conflict with your evo-materialist religion.

I acknowledge that while we backed Israel, the Communists backed the Arabs.

That is a few steps short of your idiotic notion that if an Islamic group ever had any contact with Communists that suddenly they renounced their religion and became secular and want to kill people because of evolutionary biology.

9-11 was not a Communist plot. It was the plot of an Islamic cleric.

That is exactly the point that creationists try to make that consistently gets ignored or lost on evos who claim to be Christians; cherry picking Scripture.

If I'm crazy for believing that the creation account took six days, then why am I not crazy for believing other scientifically impossible things like the virgin birth and the resurrection? And yet, any evolutionist who claims to be a Christian is, by default, admitting to believing other scientifically impossible events.

So, amd, please explain why the virgin birth and the resurrection are acceptable things to believe in in contradiction to science, but the creation account isn't.

Thank you, ZC, for putting it so succinctly.

And according to our Geocentric Creationist FReepers you too are “cherry picking” what scriptures to use and ‘putting the word of man over the word of God’ if you accept that the Earth is in orbit around the Sun.

Thus we see the problem with creationism. Once a particular interpretation of scripture is accepted as ‘the word of God’ then how could ANY amount of evidence ever contradict it?

Believing that the creation of the natural world utilized natural means, and using science to discover those processes whereby stars and elements and planets form - is not a denial that God can and does perform miracles.

Do you suppose miracles can be explained by science?

Again with the “claims” garbage (move over St. Peter, and hand those keys to metmom). Is the Pope, who said evolution was “a fact that enriches our understanding of life and being and such” also only “claiming” to be a Christian? Do you think he similarly rejects miraculous involvement of God in the world?

Wrong again, dreamer. The Islamo-Commie Alliance exists in the here and now, and is stronger than ever before. Russia is still a gangster state run by the very same gangster as when they were called the Soviet Union. Red China is still the very same gangster state as they were before we opened up “free trade” with them. Now we are transferring our wealth to the communists, while they build their militaries, form new anti-American alliances while retaining all their old alliances, and it is all being done without the slightest hindrance from the now defunct US-led Cold War counter-alliance. And it is happening right before your eyes, and you are completely blind to it.

And you are blind to the fact that those who say they are Islamic, follow an Islamic cleric, justify their actions by quoting the Quran, and whose actions are applauded in the Islamic world...... are in fact motivated by Islam.

Just how delusional do you have to be to think that somehow secretly they are really inspired by a scientific theory that they do not even know?

I know how delusional, as you give evidence every day.

Delusional enough to think that HIV doesn't cause AIDS.

Delusional enough to think that biologists should be “frog marched” off to prison.

Delusional enough to think that man walked with dinosaurs.

Delusional enough to think that evolution is not a measurable and observable process.

Delusional enough to think that “time dilation” explains how light from one hundred million light years away somehow started its journey within the last six thousand years.

Pretty darn delusional.

And how are scientists not geocentrists when they talk about sunrise and sunset? What about the celestial sphere that astronomers constantly refer to? Don't tell me that they actually believe that we are in the center of a sphere that the stars are all fixed to.

Anything in Scripture that is written as a narrative account is rightly read that way. Jesus Himself referred to the creation account, the creation of Adam and Eve, and the Flood as actual events.

Did He lie and misrepresent those events as fact instead of allegory to those who heard Him? Or was He telling the truth?

Sure it is. It is putting Scripture subservient to man's interpretation of data as observed from man's perspective, which is only one limited point of view.

Is the Pope, who said evolution was “a fact that enriches our understanding of life and being and such” also only “claiming” to be a Christian?

Are you saying that the Pope is infallible? And what if a different Pope make a different statement? Then who's right?

Way to miss the point metmom.

Our Geocentric Creationist Freepers have it in their head that “and HE set the foundations of the Earth so that they should not be move forever” and other scriptures necessitates a geocentric model. According to them you are “cherry picking” what scriptures to believe in just as much as I or Benedict XVI is; unless you agree with their particular scriptural interpretation.

And the supposed ‘infallibility’ of the Pope on matters of faith is completely irrelevant to the question.

The construction you seem so enamored of is that if one accepts evolution that they are only “claiming” to be Christian and somehow also reject the notion of God's miraculous involvement with the world.

Seeings as how Pope Benedict XVI said evolution was a “fact which enriches our understanding of life and being and such” do you think he too is only “claiming” to be a Christian or that he rejects Gods miracles?

It matters not at all that he is the Pope except to illustrate the absurdity of your argument. If another were selected and he said it as Karl Ratzinger, would you assume that “Karl” was only “claiming” to be a Christian, and would you think that he also rejected the virgin birth or the resurrection of Jesus the Christ?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.