Without France, there probably wouldn't have been an America. Most likely wouldn't, actually.
Correct. The problem is that they helped us before the atheists took over in their revolution, sad sack.
Posted on 09/18/2009 9:22:24 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
The murderous secular humanist religions of Communism and Nazism were spawned by the anti-God/utopian tradition of Revolutionary France. The Black Book of Communism, an 800- page compendium of the crimes of Communist regimes worldwide, graphically details the terror, torture, man-made famine, mass deportations, starvation, and massacres undertaken on behalf of revolutionary utopian ideals. The reality of Communism, which claimed to be an emissary of the Enlightenment, of universal brotherhood, and of happiness for all as envisioned by Gracchus Babeuf, turned out to be not only a sadistic engine for unimaginable evil but also the creator of hells on earth.
The book’s authors point to Communism’s “biological and zoological strain of thinking” as the engine of evil that proved itself to be a most effective means of denying the humanity of Communism’s millions of victims. “This strain of thinking,” explained Stephane Courtois, “is why so many of the crimes of Communism were crimes against humanity, and how Marxist-Leninist ideology managed to justify these crimes to its followers.” (The Black Book of Communism, p. 751)
Biocentrism: the Biological/Zoological Strain of Thinking
Biocentrism or ecocentrism, terms synonymous with today’s sustainable development/global warming crowd, is the “biological and zoological strain of thinking” in disguise. Biocentrism is antithetical to America ’s Judeo-Christian worldview in that it not only reduces man to a soulless ape, but makes his life less valuable than cockroaches, earthworms, spotted owls, trash fish, grizzlies, alligators, and wolves. Those who trace the genesis of ideas, such as Donald Worster, point to Charles Darwin as the most important spokesman for the biocentrism attitude. In short, Darwin ’s theory of evolution, the malignant heart of biocentrism, leads to contempt and even hatred towards humanity.
“Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.” (Earth First! Journal editor, John Daily)
“To feed a starving child is to exacerbate the world population problem.” (Yale professor Lamont Cole)
Biocentrism and its morally-warped system of philosophy and morality thrive right here in America . Communism (multiculturalism/ Cultural Marxism) and its diabolical mother, Secular Humanism, plus its twisted sisters, Postmodernism and Cosmic Humanism (New Age global warming crowd) are now the predominant way of thinking in most of America’s power centers. At the heart of each of these systems beats the black heart of Darwinian biocentrism.
Dr. James Dobson notes, “The Secular Humanist system....has outstripped Judeo- Christian precepts in the universities.... judiciary.... federal bureaucracy, in business, medicine, law, psychology, sociology....arts, in many public schools, and to be sure, in the halls of Congress.” (Understanding the Times, David A. Noebel, p. 7)
Every day in our public schools, America’s children are “animalized” through the teaching of Darwinian evolutionary propaganda. Though some are able to resist this dehumanizing spiritual attack, many more are not. Of those who cannot, some will go on to join the ranks of anti-God, anti-America, anti-human revolutionaries, thereby becoming accomplices in the destruction of the nation that nourishes and protects them. Others will become practical atheists who, having no faith in God, will not fight for a nation founded on Judeo-Christian precepts. From a secular humanist point of view, these are desired outcomes because:
“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States.” (Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund)
These things are occurring because for nearly two centuries Secular Humanists and revolutionary fellow travelers - having infiltrated and taken control of this nation’s education establishment - incrementally replaced our nation’s founding Judeo-Christian moral and philosophical worldview and history with a revolutionary catechism. The effect of this has been to not only undermine and delegitimize our nation’s traditional ideas and institutions but to also reverse and upend the natural order, all of which is leading to the destruction of our civilization.
“To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.” (Alexander Solzhenitsyn)
Teaching to this nation’s future leaders, jurists, lawmakers, government workers, teachers, etc., the ideas and philosophies of men and women such as Comte, Marx, Malthus, de Sade, Rousseau, Reich, Freud, Darwin, Nietzsche, Lenin, Stalin, Heidegger, Adorno, Lukacs, Gramsci, Sanger, Marcuse, Dewey, Kinsey, Derrida, and Foucault, for example, has unleashed a devastating wave of corruption, debauchery, political correctness, chaos, pathologies, crime, narcissism, raw powergrabbing, and abandonment of allegiance towards these United States of America, all of which paves the way for the rise of a socialistic, sustainably developed New World Order.
An alternative power structure necessary for deconstructing our Constitutional Republic has been created. This “shadow government” of interlocking relationships and mutually reinforcing agendas consists of, for example, the New Left, the Democratic machine, environmental organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club, Audubon Society, and The Wildlife Federation; big money foundations, such as Heinz, Mott, Blue Moon, Turner, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund; federal and state fish and wildlife departments, and of course, the United Nations. In hot pursuit of their North American Union project, the power and money hungry Transnational Right aids and abets the destructive process.
With the exception of the dissident voices of “intolerant, racist/haters” like Christians and other true Conservatives, the majority of Americans have passively acquiesced to being told that they are mindless, soulless apes. They also allow their children to be animalized and even told that as apes, they share a common heritage with earthworms. In light of this, the following question bears asking: Why should anyone, let alone the narcissists who are busily deconstructing our nation, respect and serve such a people?
If Antonio Gramsci were alive, he would be gratified by how well his plan for the slow and gradual destruction of America from the inside is working.
Agenda 21: The Utopian Fantasy
Agenda 21 was adopted at the 1992 UN Conference in Rio de Janeiro. This 300-page document contains 40 chapters loaded with recommendations to micro-manage virtually every facet of human existence. Agenda 21 is not a treaty but a “soft-law” policy document that does not require Senate ratification. Some of the key players involved in its production and adoption are Al Gore, Ted Turner, and Maurice Strong. President George H.W. Bush signed it and President Clinton issued Executive Order No. 12852, which created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development.
In his, “Sustainable Development: Transforming America,” Henry Lamb provides us with a vignette of the emerging utopia. Speaking only of America, he says:
“Half the land area of the entire country will be designated ‘wilderness areas’ where only wildlife managers and researchers will be allowed. These areas will be interconnected by ‘corridors of wilderness’ to allow migration of wildlife… Wolves will be as plentiful in Virginia and Pennsylvania as they are now in Idaho and Montana . Panthers and alligators will roam freely from the Everglades to the Okefenokee and beyond.... Transportation between sustainable communities (islands of human habitation)....will be primarily by light rail systems....highways that remain will be super transport corridors, such as the “Trans- Texas Corridor” now being designed....” (Ecologic Special Report, Dec. 1, 2005)
Property Acquisition Schemes
“The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If “Thou shalt not covet,” and “Thou shalt not steal,” were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society, before it can be civilized or made free.”(John Adams, The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States, Charles Francis Adams, Ed., Vol. VI, p.9)
The Wildlands Project, written by Dr. Reed Noss, who is under contract with The Nature Conservancy, is one such scheme. It has never been debated or voted on by elected officials. Nevertheless, it is being implemented through backdoor initiatives. Through its use thus far, 106.5 million acres have been acquired by being designated as wilderness since 1964.
Henry Lamb reports that not only is eminent domain a key “land-taking” strategy but:
“In the West, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management are driving ranchers off the land by reducing grazing allotments…people who have recreational cabins on federal land, are discovering that their permits are not being renewed. The Fish and Wildlife Service is forcing people off their land through designations of “wetlands,” and “critical habitat”....” (Lamb, op. cit.)
The biocentric Endangered Species Act makes use of spotted owls, plants, trash fish, alligators, grizzlies, wolves, and more to run people off their land. Within the space of one week in 2006, three young Florida women were attacked by so-called “managed” alligators. All three women died gruesome deaths. “Managed” wolves are likewise useful for terrorizing landowners, especially when said owners have been criminally deprived of the basic right of self defense.
An article entitled, “Wolf Management Program Actions Show Children are Expendable,” in the Wolfcrossing blog speaks of the outrage, despair, and sense of helplessness felt by landowners handcuffed by politically correct Department of Fish and Wildlife regulations that elevate the welfare of wolves over that of people, thus leaving them helpless in the face of marauding wolves.
Sister Flash writes, “Recently a little boy was encircled by Mexican wolves....the Luna pack circled him for more than five minutes.” One month later, wrote Sister Flash, the pack attacked a family dog as it followed its 8-year old owner (a girl) who was going to feed the family's horses. Thirty days later, “the (same) little girl’s beautiful black quarter horse (Six) was trapped in his corral and brutally slaughtered by the same wolves.... (More recently) a small dog named Maggie was attacked protecting her child’s play yard, right off the front porch....” (http://wolfcrossing.org/blog/? p=235)
Not only have the wolves not been removed, but the notorious alpha male - who had been relocated from Arizona to New Mexico for hanging around a schoolyard in Blue, AZ - has been declared “no longer a threat,” by the complicit New Mexico Department of Game and Fish.
“In the beginning, God created....” is the core presupposition on which Western civilization advanced for more than two millennia. Its highest expression is in our Declaration of Independence, where it serves as the ultimate source of our unalienable rights. This presupposition is condemned by most western policy makers and by the UN, all of whom prefer the biocentric view:
“Human happiness, and....fecundity, are not as important as a wild and healthy planet....until such time as homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.” (David Graber, research biologist with the National Park Service)
“....Christianity (has set) humans apart from nature (and) converted the world into a warehouse of commodities for human enjoyment.” (Global Biodiversity Assessment, p. 787)
In a chilling portent of things to come, M. Macnab, a respondent to the Wolfcrossing article, spoke to all Americans when she warned:
“We here in ‘wolf recovery territory’ know all to well what horrible encroachments on our rights can occur when state and federal officials violate their true purpose. Life without basic rights to protecting one’s family and property is not at all pleasant and this careless and lawless disregard for others welfare will, if not checked…become the standard for all.”
Without France, there probably wouldn't have been an America. Most likely wouldn't, actually.
Correct. The problem is that they helped us before the atheists took over in their revolution, sad sack.
In all likelihood more peopled died in American abortuaries TODAY than died in the Spanish Inquisition.
“I reject it altogether. That doesn’t make me any less conservative.”
Would I be off-track to spectulate that, while you reject it, you do not despise it as do the goyim God-haters?
Saw O Jerusalem today. Thought it was great.
Oh.
Never mind.
When quoting someone else, you should put the words in quotes and give them credit. Otherwise, it is plagerizing. >>>
grow up already. Nobody is taking credit or writing a book or term paper...
I’m indifferent to it. There are certain aspects of it that I don’t care for but nothing that gets me bent out of shape.
Ah, justice. :)
*********************
She does!
There is nothing atheistic about a scientific theory.
That is the talk of one who has willingly retarded thier intellectual and theological understanding.
Leaving the Episcopalianism of George Washington and James Madison aside for a moment, it was widely thought by Hamilton and the Federalists that Jefferson was a flake. Whether the main problems were sexual, who knows. The "wall of separation" comment in a private letter on disputes between Baptists and Anglicans in Virginia is a private opinion, is not in the U.S. Constitution, and has no force of law, however many secular humanist crackpots invoke this as part of their anti-Christian theology.
"In 1812, President Madison signed a federal bill which economically aided the Bible Society of Philadelphia in its goal of the mass distribution of the Bible."
If he were a secular humanist opposed to Christianity, this was a funny way to show it.
LOVE your screen name.
Fair enough.
Oh, but didn’t mean to imply that I don’t think it is true.
If the whole bunch of them were secular humanists, or atheists, as so many like to try to claim, they sure had a funny way of showing it.
But the current crop of secular humanists would deny the Christian heritage and beliefs of the Founding Fathers, and the Christian roots of this country. They are up to no good.
The Founding Fathers saw to it that there was no state religion capable of being imposed on the citizens of this country as there was in England at that time with the Church of England. However, recognizing and encouraging Christianity, in no way establishes a religion or establishes a state sponsored religion, or gives one denomination precedence over another.
That’s either a misconception, by the ignorant who have been lied to, or a lie, perpetrated by the atheists of our day to remove any trace of Christianity from our government.
Denying the Christianity or Christian influence that was intricately tied to the foundation of this country, will ultimately destroy this country, something the atheists are working in cahoots with groups like the ACLU to accomplish.
People who malign Christianity and call into question the Christianity of the Founding Fathers, just because they find some odd quote and take it out of context, are up to no good. There’s no reason for this except to undermine the foundations this country is built on.
Did some of the Founding Fathers say odd or inconsistent things? Sometimes. But being imperfect human beings as all of us are, that doesn’t automatically invalidate their faith, or the government that was built on that faith and those principles.
Why are you so fixated on calling people *retards* or *retarded* when they don’t agree with you and your take on the ToE?
While scientific theories, in and of themselves, contain no morals, they can certainly be used, or misused, but the unscrupulous to advance their causes, as has happened greatly with the ToE.
The problem comes in when the theory is hijacked by special interest groups to push their atheistic, liberal, God hating agenda with not only nary a whimper, but with the full support and blessing of those who otherwise call themselves Christian and conservatives.
Evos can call themselves what they want, but actions speak louder than words and when those evos who call themselves Christians and conservatives align themselves with groups like the ACLU and give their support and approval to their actions, they prove that they are neither conservative, nor likely Christian.
You simply cannot betray everything that conservatives and Christians stand for and adhere to and expect to convince anyone else that you are yet either of those.
Thank you. :)
Don't presume to try to tell me that I cannot be a Christian and accept the theory of evolution.
Piety and devotion to our Lord Jesus the Christ is not based on a sliding scale with how wacky your cosmology is and how much you hate science and ascribe atheist belief to the mainstream position of Christian thought.
You're outta there!
Yeah, a guy who published a version of the New Testament so people could learn Christ’s “pure principles”, a guy who attended church in the Capitol and gave money to Christian missionaries out of the U.S. Treasury...nope, no connection to Judeo-Christian tradition there...
I said they contain no morals, not that they were not atheistic. The ToE allows no room for God by the demand for the assumptions by the evos that it be mechanistic and materialistic.
Don't presume to try to tell me that I cannot be a Christian and accept the theory of evolution.
I never said that Christians can't accept the ToE. They can be wrong about that just like Christians can be wrong about other things.
Piety and devotion to our Lord Jesus the Christ is not based on a sliding scale with how wacky your cosmology is and how much you hate science and ascribe atheist belief to the mainstream position of Christian thought.
Nor is one's piety and devotion to Christ based on some wacky scale of how closely one's views conform to *mainstream Christian thought*, especially when mainstream Christian thought these days denies things like the Bible being the inspired work of God, the virgin birth, the Bible even being factual, but rather just allegory, supports abortion and homosexual marriage.
Mainstream Christian thought is pretty liberal and is not representative of the Biblical position on most issues.
A Christian's views should be in conformity to those of Jesus, not popular church opinion.
Piety and devotion to Christ certainly doesn't leave much room for the vitriol and hatred towards other Christians who disagree with them that some on both sides of the debate have shown. It also does not leave much room to excuse misrepresenting others and lying about them by calling them science haters and calling them retards (or cretards). I can just see Jesus calling someone who disagrees with him a *retard* using a description of some unfortunate people in our world as a pejorative, with the scorn and contempt that evos use towards creationists, especially when they mock them for actually holding to the integrity of Scripture.
The question remains. Not. "And as for the term *cretarded*, are you really the 10 year old that you talk like? "
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.