Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Agenda 21, Secular Humanism, and the Animalization of Americans
Conservative Underground ^ | 15-Sep-2009 | Linda Kimball

Posted on 09/18/2009 9:22:24 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

The murderous secular humanist religions of Communism and Nazism were spawned by the anti-God/utopian tradition of Revolutionary France. The Black Book of Communism, an 800- page compendium of the crimes of Communist regimes worldwide, graphically details the terror, torture, man-made famine, mass deportations, starvation, and massacres undertaken on behalf of revolutionary utopian ideals. The reality of Communism, which claimed to be an emissary of the Enlightenment, of universal brotherhood, and of happiness for all as envisioned by Gracchus Babeuf, turned out to be not only a sadistic engine for unimaginable evil but also the creator of hells on earth.

The book’s authors point to Communism’s “biological and zoological strain of thinking” as the engine of evil that proved itself to be a most effective means of denying the humanity of Communism’s millions of victims. “This strain of thinking,” explained Stephane Courtois, “is why so many of the crimes of Communism were crimes against humanity, and how Marxist-Leninist ideology managed to justify these crimes to its followers.” (The Black Book of Communism, p. 751)

Biocentrism: the Biological/Zoological Strain of Thinking

Biocentrism or ecocentrism, terms synonymous with today’s sustainable development/global warming crowd, is the “biological and zoological strain of thinking” in disguise. Biocentrism is antithetical to America ’s Judeo-Christian worldview in that it not only reduces man to a soulless ape, but makes his life less valuable than cockroaches, earthworms, spotted owls, trash fish, grizzlies, alligators, and wolves. Those who trace the genesis of ideas, such as Donald Worster, point to Charles Darwin as the most important spokesman for the biocentrism attitude. In short, Darwin ’s theory of evolution, the malignant heart of biocentrism, leads to contempt and even hatred towards humanity.

“Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.” (Earth First! Journal editor, John Daily)

“To feed a starving child is to exacerbate the world population problem.” (Yale professor Lamont Cole)

Biocentrism and its morally-warped system of philosophy and morality thrive right here in America . Communism (multiculturalism/ Cultural Marxism) and its diabolical mother, Secular Humanism, plus its twisted sisters, Postmodernism and Cosmic Humanism (New Age global warming crowd) are now the predominant way of thinking in most of America’s power centers. At the heart of each of these systems beats the black heart of Darwinian biocentrism.

Dr. James Dobson notes, “The Secular Humanist system....has outstripped Judeo- Christian precepts in the universities.... judiciary.... federal bureaucracy, in business, medicine, law, psychology, sociology....arts, in many public schools, and to be sure, in the halls of Congress.” (Understanding the Times, David A. Noebel, p. 7)

Every day in our public schools, America’s children are “animalized” through the teaching of Darwinian evolutionary propaganda. Though some are able to resist this dehumanizing spiritual attack, many more are not. Of those who cannot, some will go on to join the ranks of anti-God, anti-America, anti-human revolutionaries, thereby becoming accomplices in the destruction of the nation that nourishes and protects them. Others will become practical atheists who, having no faith in God, will not fight for a nation founded on Judeo-Christian precepts. From a secular humanist point of view, these are desired outcomes because:

“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States.” (Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund)

These things are occurring because for nearly two centuries Secular Humanists and revolutionary fellow travelers - having infiltrated and taken control of this nation’s education establishment - incrementally replaced our nation’s founding Judeo-Christian moral and philosophical worldview and history with a revolutionary catechism. The effect of this has been to not only undermine and delegitimize our nation’s traditional ideas and institutions but to also reverse and upend the natural order, all of which is leading to the destruction of our civilization.

“To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.” (Alexander Solzhenitsyn)

Teaching to this nation’s future leaders, jurists, lawmakers, government workers, teachers, etc., the ideas and philosophies of men and women such as Comte, Marx, Malthus, de Sade, Rousseau, Reich, Freud, Darwin, Nietzsche, Lenin, Stalin, Heidegger, Adorno, Lukacs, Gramsci, Sanger, Marcuse, Dewey, Kinsey, Derrida, and Foucault, for example, has unleashed a devastating wave of corruption, debauchery, political correctness, chaos, pathologies, crime, narcissism, raw powergrabbing, and abandonment of allegiance towards these United States of America, all of which paves the way for the rise of a socialistic, sustainably developed New World Order.

An alternative power structure necessary for deconstructing our Constitutional Republic has been created. This “shadow government” of interlocking relationships and mutually reinforcing agendas consists of, for example, the New Left, the Democratic machine, environmental organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club, Audubon Society, and The Wildlife Federation; big money foundations, such as Heinz, Mott, Blue Moon, Turner, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund; federal and state fish and wildlife departments, and of course, the United Nations. In hot pursuit of their North American Union project, the power and money hungry Transnational Right aids and abets the destructive process.

With the exception of the dissident voices of “intolerant, racist/haters” like Christians and other true Conservatives, the majority of Americans have passively acquiesced to being told that they are mindless, soulless apes. They also allow their children to be animalized and even told that as apes, they share a common heritage with earthworms. In light of this, the following question bears asking: Why should anyone, let alone the narcissists who are busily deconstructing our nation, respect and serve such a people?

If Antonio Gramsci were alive, he would be gratified by how well his plan for the slow and gradual destruction of America from the inside is working.

Agenda 21: The Utopian Fantasy

Agenda 21 was adopted at the 1992 UN Conference in Rio de Janeiro. This 300-page document contains 40 chapters loaded with recommendations to micro-manage virtually every facet of human existence. Agenda 21 is not a treaty but a “soft-law” policy document that does not require Senate ratification. Some of the key players involved in its production and adoption are Al Gore, Ted Turner, and Maurice Strong. President George H.W. Bush signed it and President Clinton issued Executive Order No. 12852, which created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development.

In his, “Sustainable Development: Transforming America,” Henry Lamb provides us with a vignette of the emerging utopia. Speaking only of America, he says:

“Half the land area of the entire country will be designated ‘wilderness areas’ where only wildlife managers and researchers will be allowed. These areas will be interconnected by ‘corridors of wilderness’ to allow migration of wildlife… Wolves will be as plentiful in Virginia and Pennsylvania as they are now in Idaho and Montana . Panthers and alligators will roam freely from the Everglades to the Okefenokee and beyond.... Transportation between sustainable communities (islands of human habitation)....will be primarily by light rail systems....highways that remain will be super transport corridors, such as the “Trans- Texas Corridor” now being designed....” (Ecologic Special Report, Dec. 1, 2005)

Property Acquisition Schemes

“The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If “Thou shalt not covet,” and “Thou shalt not steal,” were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society, before it can be civilized or made free.”(John Adams, The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States, Charles Francis Adams, Ed., Vol. VI, p.9)

The Wildlands Project, written by Dr. Reed Noss, who is under contract with The Nature Conservancy, is one such scheme. It has never been debated or voted on by elected officials. Nevertheless, it is being implemented through backdoor initiatives. Through its use thus far, 106.5 million acres have been acquired by being designated as wilderness since 1964.

Henry Lamb reports that not only is eminent domain a key “land-taking” strategy but:

“In the West, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management are driving ranchers off the land by reducing grazing allotments…people who have recreational cabins on federal land, are discovering that their permits are not being renewed. The Fish and Wildlife Service is forcing people off their land through designations of “wetlands,” and “critical habitat”....” (Lamb, op. cit.)

The biocentric Endangered Species Act makes use of spotted owls, plants, trash fish, alligators, grizzlies, wolves, and more to run people off their land. Within the space of one week in 2006, three young Florida women were attacked by so-called “managed” alligators. All three women died gruesome deaths. “Managed” wolves are likewise useful for terrorizing landowners, especially when said owners have been criminally deprived of the basic right of self defense.

An article entitled, “Wolf Management Program Actions Show Children are Expendable,” in the Wolfcrossing blog speaks of the outrage, despair, and sense of helplessness felt by landowners handcuffed by politically correct Department of Fish and Wildlife regulations that elevate the welfare of wolves over that of people, thus leaving them helpless in the face of marauding wolves.

Sister Flash writes, “Recently a little boy was encircled by Mexican wolves....the Luna pack circled him for more than five minutes.” One month later, wrote Sister Flash, the pack attacked a family dog as it followed its 8-year old owner (a girl) who was going to feed the family's horses. Thirty days later, “the (same) little girl’s beautiful black quarter horse (Six) was trapped in his corral and brutally slaughtered by the same wolves.... (More recently) a small dog named Maggie was attacked protecting her child’s play yard, right off the front porch....” (http://wolfcrossing.org/blog/? p=235)

Not only have the wolves not been removed, but the notorious alpha male - who had been relocated from Arizona to New Mexico for hanging around a schoolyard in Blue, AZ - has been declared “no longer a threat,” by the complicit New Mexico Department of Game and Fish.

“In the beginning, God created....” is the core presupposition on which Western civilization advanced for more than two millennia. Its highest expression is in our Declaration of Independence, where it serves as the ultimate source of our unalienable rights. This presupposition is condemned by most western policy makers and by the UN, all of whom prefer the biocentric view:

“Human happiness, and....fecundity, are not as important as a wild and healthy planet....until such time as homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.” (David Graber, research biologist with the National Park Service)

“....Christianity (has set) humans apart from nature (and) converted the world into a warehouse of commodities for human enjoyment.” (Global Biodiversity Assessment, p. 787)

In a chilling portent of things to come, M. Macnab, a respondent to the Wolfcrossing article, spoke to all Americans when she warned:

“We here in ‘wolf recovery territory’ know all to well what horrible encroachments on our rights can occur when state and federal officials violate their true purpose. Life without basic rights to protecting one’s family and property is not at all pleasant and this careless and lawless disregard for others welfare will, if not checked…become the standard for all.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 1992; agenda21; babeuf; blackbookofcommunism; csd; econuts; eminentdomain; gracchusbabeuf; henrylamb; mauricestrong; moralabsolutes; natureconservancy; northamericanunion; strong; un; wildlandsproject
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 701-702 next last
To: OldSpice

did you ever hear of paragraphs or is this your first time posting?


221 posted on 09/19/2009 6:17:13 PM PDT by Coleus (Abortion, Euthanasia & FOCA - - don't Obama and the Democrats just kill ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: narses
Really, and that injured you how? The poster happens to be a friend, he won’t mind, ask him.

Too lazy to write your own post? You should credit when you copy/paste someone elses post.

222 posted on 09/19/2009 6:17:24 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice
I’m sure you are deeply uncomfortable with those quotes by the Founding Fathers that I’ve posted above.

I know you got zotted, but I'd like to point out how much I enjoy this jazz where every atheist has somehow evolved the ability to read the minds of Christians over the Internet. Truly, an awesome example of a beneficial mutation.

223 posted on 09/19/2009 6:17:56 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater; narses
When quoting someone else, you should put the words in quotes and give them credit. Otherwise, it is plagerizing.

If narses wants to use one of my quotes verbatim without crediting me he is certainly free to do so, he and I have been FRiends a long time, I trust him completely.

224 posted on 09/19/2009 6:18:11 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I would say that a reasonable person would conclude that you agree with the troll.

Do you agree or disagree with my post?

225 posted on 09/19/2009 6:18:15 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater; narses; wagglebee
No. You copied/pasted someone else's words and didn't give credit.

Why are you changing the subject instead of answering the question?

226 posted on 09/19/2009 6:20:28 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Why are you changing the subject instead of answering the question?

Which question? Is God the Intelligent Designer? I already said yes. But you won't answer will you.

227 posted on 09/19/2009 6:21:42 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Why are you changing the subject instead of answering the question?

I already did.

228 posted on 09/19/2009 6:22:23 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater; metmom; narses; trisham; betty boop

I agree that Thomas Jefferson was a flawed sinner just like the rest of us. Jefferson was not a traditional Christian, but he was hardly an atheist and he was but one of the Founding Fathers. Many would like to pretend that Jefferson was the most important Founding Father, I do not subscribe to this point of view.


229 posted on 09/19/2009 6:22:54 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Jefferson was not a traditional Christian

That is what I said. Thanks for agreeing with me.

230 posted on 09/19/2009 6:24:26 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater; metmom; narses; trisham
However, you STILL have never answered the question:

Do you agree that the Founding Fathers were generally Christians who founded America on Judeo-Christian principles? YES or NO.

231 posted on 09/19/2009 6:27:32 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; Borges; Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; wagglebee; narses
amd post 30: Crazy Creationists cannot seem to decide if acceptance of the theory of evolution makes you a humanist who worships humanity, or an anti-humanist who denigrates mankind.

Neither of which addresses the fact that Creationists are too Cretarded to even figure out if belief in evolution makes one a humanist who worships humanity, or an anti-humanist who denigrates mankind as ‘nothing more than an ape’. Seriously cretarded.

You're going to have to face it some time. The teaching of evolution, which is an atheistic and humanistic philosophy, does have it's impact on the thinking, values, and morals of society.

And yes, if can go either way.

If can cause people to either think that humankind is the epitome of creation, or that we are merely animals, a sack of chemicals which chemical reactions control our thoughts and actions.

The teaching of evolution is not without its effect on thinking and where our culture is going, whether you like it or not.

And as for the term *cretarded*, are you really the 10 year old that you talk like? Sheesh, that's seriously immature, little boy talk.

232 posted on 09/19/2009 6:29:32 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Why do you keep going off topic on threads to harass me about things that the thread isn’t about?

Why are you carrying that from thread to thread?


233 posted on 09/19/2009 6:34:36 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

And Jefferson, although not adhering to all traditional Christian theology, completely accepted all basic Christian morality and essential world view.

To try to argue that because he did not accept or adhere to all traditional Christain theology somehow renders him an atheist who would embrace the evil that such people who argue this also promote, is the greatest deceit, and it is hard to believe that they are even sincere in this misrepresentation.

They know they are misusing him.


234 posted on 09/19/2009 6:35:19 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: metmom

When people are steeped in envy and anger, they lose their sense of proportion, among other things...


235 posted on 09/19/2009 6:37:50 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
And Jefferson, although not adhering to all traditional Christian theology, completely accepted all basic Christian morality and essential world view.

Additionally, Jefferson kept his nontraditional views OUT of the Declaration of Independence which was his primary contribution as a Founding Father.

236 posted on 09/19/2009 6:38:33 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater; wagglebee; narses
I already did.

No, you didn't. There's no where on this thread from post 197 on, where you answered the question of whether or not you are taking OldSpice's side in the debate.

Your responses since then have been:

post 202 :Typical response. When you can't refute the facts, you make a personal attack.

post 207 :If you go back and look at my posts you will see that I have never posted anything of that sort.

post 211 :I already addressed that on my first post in this thread.

post 213 :When quoting someone else, you should put the words in quotes and give them credit. Otherwise, it is plagerizing.

post 216 :No. You copied/pasted someone else's words and didn't give credit.

post 222 :Too lazy to write your own post? You should credit when you copy/paste someone elses post.

post 225 :Do you agree or disagree with my post?

post 227 :Which question? Is God the Intelligent Designer? I already said yes. But you won't answer will you.

post 230 :That is what I said. Thanks for agreeing with me.

So, CW, you did not already do it, as is documented here. You've deflected and avoided and outright lied about responding, as demonstrated by the posts you've posted since the question was put to you in post 197, but you did NOT answer the question.

So, here's another chance....

mm post 197:Are you taking the the former troll's side in this debate? Because it sure looks that way from your comments.

237 posted on 09/19/2009 6:47:48 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: metmom

“Are you taking the the former troll’s side in this debate? Because it sure looks that way from your comments.”

How can that be, when I called his arguments “road apples?”


238 posted on 09/19/2009 6:51:05 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice; betty boop
Again, I know you've been zotted, but what kind of moron cites WWI and WWII as religious wars? They only count as religious wars if you consider Kaiser Bill's homosexual tendencies more important than his strategic goals (still a stretch, it's not as if fellatio is a religion), and consider Hitler primarily an anti-religious operator. I agree with the latter, but that certainly wouldn't support your screeds against religion.

If your point is that these wars prove that Europe was not civilized despite Christianity's presence there, perhaps you could find us a "civilized" country with a government founded on atheism. Shouldn't be too hard...you have every communist country and Germany from 1933-1945 to choose from.

Oh, and just one more thing: Your civilized fellow atheists killed almost twice as many people during the Tet Offensive than died in 350 years of the Spanish Inquisition. In fact, the number of civilians massacred at Hue by the Cong was almost as high as the lower end estimates for the inquisition (2,800 vs. 3,000) and in March, 1975 they killed possibly as many as 150,000 people (including tens of thousands of refugees) with constant shelling in an incident known as the "column of tears."

Too bad you're gone...I can do this all day.

239 posted on 09/19/2009 6:52:26 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: dsc; metmom; ColdWater
How can that be, when I called his arguments “road apples?”

You called OldSpice's (the zotted troll) arguments "road apples", metmom is talking whether or not ColdWater agrees with the troll.

240 posted on 09/19/2009 6:53:52 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 701-702 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson