Posted on 09/15/2009 2:26:29 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater
A few quick snippets... Judge David Carter, Central District of California, ordered early discovery; Obama has 30 days to produce his records, including his hospital, birth certificate, name of doctor, and all of the signatures.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediamattersaction.org ...
No, you’re absolutely correct. It just doesn’t seem rational that we are supposed to take his word for it when he’s contentious and belitting, as well as not appearing to be taking the issue seriously.
And the Aussie Bomford thing certianly did seem to be resolved as a forgery, and he was dissimulating about that.
I could be wrong - I’m popping in and out.
It was a "Certification of Live Birth". Those are printed up on demand, on whatever the current form is. The form is probably just printed at the same time, on "security paper", which would provided the background.
What was the bet Non-Sequitur reneged on?
She claims that I said the case would be dismissed last Tuesday. My bet all along is that if the case is dismissed at any time then she owes me a steak. If it goes to trial then regardless of verdict I owe her a steak. I’m ready to stand by that wager at any time.
No system glitch as far as I know. Try closing your browser and rebooting. Hope this helps.
So whom is filing this ‘affidavit’ in Santa Ana? Is it Larry Sinclair filing it or some other shill? ... Taitz is getting too close to unlocking the affirmative action liar-in-chief’s history so she is now to be targeted in desperation, apparently. If you’re going to put this link up, explain it.
I didn’t ask you.
You have no credibility.
Actually yes you did. You pinged both of us.
Is Sinclair that “Internet Powerhouse” of yore?
Wrong again.
I asked her.
I copied you to pull your chain.
OK...well do you want to bet? Or are you chicken, too?
Actually she later stated that she had "seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i"
Source: Hawaii Dept. of Health
You know, I've been on a lot of these threads. Yet I've never seen a South Australian BC, other than the Bomford one, and also not an example of a BC from the British Protectorate of Kenya (the coastal strip which includes Mombasa, other than the two alleged to be those of BHO.
So which threads were these posted on?
BTW, I never thought the "red couch" BC was real, at least not after the Bomford one showed up, but I would like to see another Coast Province BC, or more precisely a BC from the Coast Province General Hospital (or whatever it's exact name was) from circa 1961.
A certified copy of either the long form or the COLB would be sufficient to legally establish that BHO Sr was his father. The long form would be better because it has "place of birth" for the parents. Thus it would legally establish his father as being born in Kenya. Then all it would take would be a search of visa applications to show when he entered the US, and then naturalization records from that date (1959) until BHOs alleged birthdate (Aug 4, '61) to show he was not naturalized prior to BHO Jr's birth.
Of course if the birth records show a home birth (rare in '61) and the latest "protectorate of Kenya" BC can't be invalidated.. well things would be looking grim for Barry O.
It's not the same issue. The writing, including both printed and handwritten, on the Bomford certificate does not follow the wrinkles in the paper. That can be seen at no or moderate "zoom" levels in the full sized document. It's easier to see if you reverse the colors on the image, but it's there in the original as well.
Also there were issues with the handwritten material being overwritten by the printed, rather than the other way around.
Another thing that bothered people about the Bomford image was that it was put up not long before the "red couch" "Kenyan" image, and then taken down as soon as the match with the "Kenyan" one was "discovered". This lead some to believe that it was questionable. One theory was that both were fake, as the "Kenyan" surely is, and the whole thing was a trap, which many fell into.
Birth certificates are public records, access to which is restricted these days to prevent identity theft and other sorts of misuse. But being public records, the courts can authorize selected individuals to view or obtain certified copies of them. Hawaiian law provides for that. Obama need not provide anything. The Health Department of the State of Hawaii can do it.
Again, with the childish insults.
I am not playing bait and switch. I’m explaining to people why one particular document if a self evident forgery. And I’m sorry that a whole bunch of people who believe in the forgery seem to have decided that this means a genuine document must be a forgery, but that’s not my problem. That’s their problem. Trouble is, it has the potential to have a lot of other problems.
I am not an Obamoid, or an Obama sycophant or any of the other stupid labels you want to try and put on me. Nothing would delight me more than to see him out of office, ideally, somehow with somebody more conservative (not hard as that’s virtually anyone) to replace him. But I’m not going to ‘deal in lies’ to see it happen. Nor am I going to sit back and watch others do so without commenting on the fact that they are mistaken, that they have been taken in by the lies of others. Because that’s what the alleged Obama certificate is - a lie. And a fairly obvious one at this point.
That is correct. However, not "eligible to the office of President" means "CAN NOT BE President". Impeachment is for Presidents who misbehave, it does not apply to a usurper.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.