Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CPT Connie Rhodes Case update
Phone conversation | 14 Sep 09 | me

Posted on 09/14/2009 12:17:10 PM PDT by roaddog727

I just received a call from CPT Connie Rhodes good friend with whom I have been in contact over the past several weeks

He indicated that Judge Land (Federal District Judge, Middle District of Georgia) will provide a Ruling on CPT Rhodes' TRO as well as The Defense's motion to Dismiss.

Pray for Judge Land and CPT Rhodes.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: article2section1; barackobama; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; connierhodes; dualer; naturalborn; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; orlytaitz; rhodes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: roaddog727

Could you ping me on any other updates, please?

Can’t wait! Fingers crossed.


21 posted on 09/14/2009 1:17:57 PM PDT by FreeStateYank (I want my country and constitution back, now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeStateYank

Will do.


22 posted on 09/14/2009 1:18:51 PM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

God Bless you and your family.


23 posted on 09/14/2009 1:39:29 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Does 0b0z0 have any friends, who aren't traitors, spies, tax cheats and criminals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

And may God bless you and yours as well.

Thanks.


24 posted on 09/14/2009 2:12:15 PM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Do you have enough time before MRD so that you will come into the zone for LTC and still have 3 years to serve if selected? If not, then like myself, getting center of mass is OK. I will hit MRD before I come into the zone for USAR LTC consideration. I will actually encourage senior raters to give me center of mass so they can use the above for those that have time enough left to promote. You know they have limits on above mass percentages.

Now if you will come into the LTC board zone soon, having a center of mass rating could hurt...especially for LTC in the USAR where it starts getting competetive. The big thing will be your having at least completed ILE(CGSC) and other mil and civilian education. Also, the types of assignments you have held makes a difference. Have you had Battalion XO or S-3 time...etc. I think boards tend to view DIMAs as lesser forms of USAR existence (I’m a DIMA also).

The CPT though is in a more precarious position. Should she decide she wants to stay in the regular army, she could be hurt when she comes up for MAJ. However, she may have no intention of staying in, so this may not be a fear for her. What I’m more concerned about is them charging her with conduct unbecoming an officer because she said derogulatory things about a POTUS. That would be an “atom bomb” approach, but it could be used if the current POTUS decides he is tired of dealing with this issue and pressures the SECDEF and SECARMY to push prosecution. Especially, if the judge does not grant her an injunction. Because she bravely challenged a sitting POTUS....she could be made an example of. I hope this does not occur. Do you think it could?


25 posted on 09/14/2009 4:14:28 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

I go before the LTC board this/next week and have 8 years to MRD, so no worries on getting in enough time in grade if promoted. However, the big question for me is whether or not my packet will be reviewed “honestly” or have one of those secret “Red Flags” assigned to it.

I’m already in an O5 duty position - have been for the past 4 years (2 in my current position {Team Chief} and 2 in my prior duty position, so I really can’t see how a certer of mass could knock me out of the running. And Yes, I’m a DIMA also.

Asto the CPT: she was stop-lossed, and really does not want to make a career out of the Army.

I also can not see them charging her with conduct unbecomming as she is just seeking a clarification in chain of command and lawful orders. OTOH, the wording in the complaint is a bit harsh that way. We’ll see soon enough.


26 posted on 09/14/2009 4:25:31 PM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

It looks like the judge was harsh and wanted to criticize Taitz or humiliate her. It doesnt look good because the Judge doesnt seem to want to touch the Birth Certificate issue and grant Taitz authority to verify its Authentic. The Judge needs to grant Taitz discovery in order to do this. I think the judge will rule in the governments favor and I dont like that.


27 posted on 09/14/2009 4:26:25 PM PDT by U.S. Army Retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

I am praying for all of you, roaddog.


28 posted on 09/14/2009 4:32:00 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

“A deliberate choice between doing what’s easy and doing what’s right.”

I think you might be channeling the spirit of my Navy dad. :)


29 posted on 09/14/2009 4:35:48 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

All spirits are welcome.

Thanks.


30 posted on 09/14/2009 4:38:51 PM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: U.S. Army Retired

I think that it is very possible that we heard only “one side” of the hearing and heard that one side from a slanted perspective.

In other words, what we know about what happened at the hearing is only as good as what has been reported by a single reporter.

It will be very helpful to get a fuller description of the hearing from others who attended.


31 posted on 09/14/2009 4:38:58 PM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: U.S. Army Retired

This is to roaddog, too:

You know, we got that report on the hearing from one source and the media is known to omit unhappy details for Obama.

I would want to hear from the other side before assuming I know what happened and what the Judge thinks.

I wonder if we have Orly’s side of what when on the hearing. According to the news source only Orly spoke and the judge only spoke to Orly. I would guess he was talking with Obama’s lawyers, too. I want to know that part of the hearing.


32 posted on 09/14/2009 4:43:45 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

According to the news source only Orly spoke and the judge only spoke to Orly. I would guess he was talking with Obama’s lawyers, too. I want to know that part of the hearing.


Agreed!


33 posted on 09/14/2009 4:59:42 PM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Thanks for the update.


34 posted on 09/14/2009 5:02:10 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (A mob of one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson; U.S. Army Retired

Nothing further at this point.


35 posted on 09/14/2009 5:29:22 PM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Provide a ruling? Of course, he can hardly not provide a ruling. The immediate question is “when” and then of course “what” the ruling will be. But I suspect Judge Land will keep that close to his vest until the announcement of the rulings.


36 posted on 09/14/2009 5:34:03 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
The immediate question is “when” and then of course “what” the ruling will be.

The "when" part is by noon Wednesday. Link

37 posted on 09/14/2009 5:37:25 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727
All that I wanted to see was definitive documentation that Obama either is or is not a Natural Born Citizen (NBC) - defined as: both parents US Citizens and him being born on US controlled territory.

Well we already know the answer to the first part... Or do we? We know the legend, but the legend is in tatters, it's timelines blown all to H#((.

It would be extreme irony if the original birth documents are supeoned and they show birth in a Hawaian, or even Washington state, hospital and the father's name is blank, or shows someone other than BHO Sr as the babydaddy.

Somehow I don't think concealing that would be worth $1M+, of money BO could have spent for other purposes, even if it is other people's money.

38 posted on 09/14/2009 5:39:09 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727
Actually, in my case, My OER was due a week after I filed. (not particularly good timing) but I still received a very fair writeup. However, instead of getting top blocks from both rater and Sr. Rater, I got center of mass.

You can probably forget Lt. Col. But as a reservist, as I was, so what? We aren't/weren't in it for the money anyway.

39 posted on 09/14/2009 5:42:49 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

“We aren’t/weren’t in it for the money anyway.”

True.

It was to support and defend the Constitution as well as to serve honorably. That is all I have ever wanted to do.


40 posted on 09/14/2009 6:12:17 PM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson