Skip to comments.
Cpt Connie Rhodes, MD files new complaint in Georgia seeking class action statuse
Federal District Court, Middle District of Georgia ^
| September 4, 2009
| Orly Taitz
Posted on 09/04/2009 11:36:07 AM PDT by Sibre Fan
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, and INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: 10 U.S.C. §938 and Army Regulation 27-10
COUNT I: DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF DUE TO UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATUTES, ILLEGAL ORDERS, AND LACK OF ADMINISTRATIVE OR LEGAL REMEDY
COUNT II: INJUNCTION AGAINST RETALIATION FOR CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR STATUS
COUNT III: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT: EXECUTIVE ORDERS OF Jan. 21, 2009
COUNT IV: Declaratory Judgment & Permanent Injunction PLAINTIFF SEEKS A FIVE-PART DECLARATORTY JUDGMENT AS WELL AS A PERMANENT INJUNCTION TO PROTECT CONSCIENTIOUS DISOBEDIENCE TO UNLAWFUL ORDERS FROM RETALIATION
COUNT V: AN OFFICERS RIGHT OR DUTY TO CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION TO AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENT?
COUNT VI: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT---5 U.S.C. §702, AND FEDERAL COMMON LAW apply to the PRESIDENT AS COMMANDER-in-CHIEF
COUNT VI: THE CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE PEOPLE; THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION
COUNT VIII: CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ACTIONABLE UNDER 42 U.S.C. §§1983, 1988(a)(a)
(Excerpt) Read more at archive.org ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: article2section1; barackobama; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; connierhodes; naturalborn; obamanoncitizenissue; orlytaitz; rhodes; taitz; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-217 next last
To: jude24
The State of Hawaii has authenticated his Certificate of Live Birth. Bullsh*t
41
posted on
09/04/2009 12:17:08 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Frantzie
this is the same dame. Her case was denied in Texas the day it was filed. She’s filing in GA now because it has jurisdiction over her case at the present time.
42
posted on
09/04/2009 12:17:59 PM PDT
by
humble and shy
(Taking our country back, one politician at a time)
To: jude24
Show me where in the UCMJ it prohibits soldiers from civil lawsuits?
43
posted on
09/04/2009 12:18:08 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
44
posted on
09/04/2009 12:19:16 PM PDT
by
jude24
To: pissant
45
posted on
09/04/2009 12:19:44 PM PDT
by
jude24
To: jude24
That’s about “lawful” orders. IF she is correct, then these are unlawful orders. Hence the lawsuit. Could be settled for $12.
46
posted on
09/04/2009 12:21:31 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: jude24
I know exactly what Hawaii said and did not say. You apparently are clueless.
47
posted on
09/04/2009 12:22:17 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
If I order a Private to do something, and he says, "Only if you show me your birth certificate" (since in order to be a commissioned officer I must be an American Citizen), he's getting charged with insubordination.
Same is true with the President.
48
posted on
09/04/2009 12:22:45 PM PDT
by
jude24
To: pissant
Nope. Under Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 1005, those are presumptively valid.
You conspiracy theorists are the clueless ones.
49
posted on
09/04/2009 12:24:12 PM PDT
by
jude24
To: jude24
Except if you are INDEED a liar, like Obama, then it is you who has committed the fraud
50
posted on
09/04/2009 12:25:01 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: jude24
It seems you do not know anything about the military. We take an oath to defend the Constitution not any specific individual. This is unique in the world of the different country military services. Like NAZI took an oath to Hitler instead of the country.
There are people in other countries that want to conduct trials of our military simply following the orders of their leaders. If/when Obama is proven beyond doubt a fraud, all those orders under his command would be deemed unlawful. Just think about what will occur then.
If he is valid under Art II Sec 1 of the constitution then all he has to do is produce the full form including hospital were born. This form is readily available as a number of individual have posted their live birth document on the internet born during that time.
51
posted on
09/04/2009 12:25:27 PM PDT
by
spookie
(SPOOKIE)
To: jude24
You are blowing smoke out your rear end.
52
posted on
09/04/2009 12:25:54 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Except if you are INDEED a liar, like Obama, then it is you who has committed the fraud The goalposts keep moving. Obama produced his birth certificate. That's enough, for those not vincibly ignorant - or vested in peddling conspiracy theories that he's a seeeeekrit Muslim.
I'm done here. I got better things to do than waste my 4-day weekend on fools.
53
posted on
09/04/2009 12:28:29 PM PDT
by
jude24
To: jude24
The State of Hawaii has authenticated his Certificate of Live Birth. That is game, set, match. Don't feed me the "he won't show the long form version" bullcrap. Not buying. Certified copies of State records are presumptively authentic in all courts of law. The State of Hawaii only confirmed that a Certificate of Live Birth exists and is in the Vault. They did not say what was in it. This doesn't mean the information is authenticated.
To: jude24
Oh OK I’m convinced! Thanks for posting the CoLB! Why didn’t you present this glorious evidence sooner??? /s
55
posted on
09/04/2009 12:32:17 PM PDT
by
thecraw
(Follower of Jesus by choice, American by the grace of God. Oh yeah, a proud Birther too!)
To: jude24
You dolt. That is a Certification of Live Birth. The original birth certificate has never been produced.
56
posted on
09/04/2009 12:32:17 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: jude24
That's enough, for those not vincibly ignorant - or vested in peddling conspiracy theories that he's a seeeeekrit Muslim.I agree. He's no secret Muslim. He was quite openly Muslim at that Ramadan dinner.
57
posted on
09/04/2009 12:32:31 PM PDT
by
kevao
(DISSENT: It's no longer patriotic.)
To: jude24
It's about a damned coward refusing to obey lawful orders. ( jude24)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
An honest, straightforward, upright, and moral person would be **HONORED** to prove to his troops that he is a natural born citizen and qualified to be their Commander in Chief.
With a nod of his head, Obama could do this and have all documentation available by Monday at 10 a.m. for full review by anyone who wanted to see it ( especially those serving under his command.)
So?...Why isn't he?
58
posted on
09/04/2009 12:33:05 PM PDT
by
wintertime
(People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
To: jude24
The ebay BC looks more authentic than what OBOZO has produced!
59
posted on
09/04/2009 12:36:39 PM PDT
by
newfreep
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: jude24
I am also a military member and you seem to be misinformed about the UCMJ. A military member is only required to follow a LAWFUL order. Your analogy of ordering a private to do something is erroneous. If you ordered a private to shoot your general and he refuses, then he WILL NOT be charged with insubordination. Likewise, if an Iraqi dresses in a stolen US Cpt uniform and orders the private to do something that the private believes is unlawful, then he WILL NOT be charged with insubordination if he can prove either the order was unlawful or the person giving the order did not have authority to do so. This is exactly what many people are questioning and it is lawful.
60
posted on
09/04/2009 12:37:15 PM PDT
by
TXDuke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-217 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson