Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The American Form of Government
August 30, 2009 | Unknown

Posted on 08/30/2009 1:21:53 PM PDT by MosesKnows

Different Forms of Government


When Benjamin Franklin exited the constitutional convention, a woman asked him, Sir, what have you given us? His immediate response was, a Republic mam, if you can keep it.

Yet many Americans today have come to believe that America’s governmental system is a Democracy and not a Republic. The difference between these two is essential in understanding Americanism and the American system.

Before we discuss political systems however, it is helpful to address the confusion about the political spectrum. Many people believe that the political spectrum places groups such as communist on the far left, fascists, or dictators on the far right, and political moderates or centrist in the middle.

However, a more accurate political spectrum will show government having zero power on the far right to having 100% power on the far left. At the extreme right, there is no government. The extreme left features total government under such labels as Communism, Socialism, Nazism, Fascism, Princes, Potentates, Dictators, Kings, any form of total government.

Those who claim that Nazis and Fascist are right wing never define their terms. This amounts to spreading confusion. The type of government limited to its proper role of protecting the rights of the people is toward the middle of the spectrum. That’s where the Constitution of the United States is. Those who advocate such a form of government are constitutional moderates.

So, let’s analyze the basic forms of government. They are, Monarchy or Dictatorship ruled by one, Oligarchy ruled by a few, Democracy ruled by the majority, Republic ruled by law, and Anarchy which is ruled by no one. A discussion of these five will narrow down the types of government.

Looking first at Monarchy or Dictatorship. This form of government doesn’t really exist. In the practical sense, it’s always a group that puts one of its members up front. A King has his council of nobles or Earls and every dictator has his bureaucrats or commissars, the men behind the scenes. This isn’t rule by one even though one person may be the visible leader. It’s rule by a group. So, let’s eliminate Monarchy Dictatorship because it never truly exists.

Oligarchy, which is rule by a group, is the most common form of government in all history and it is the most common form of government today. A powerful few rule most of the nations of the world and therefore Oligarchy remains.

At the other end, we find Anarchy, which means without government. Some people have looked over history and found that governments committed many of its worse crimes. Therefore, they decided that having no government might be a good idea but this is a mistake because as the ancient Greeks stated, without law there can be no freedom. America’s founding fathers agreed and held that some amount of government is a necessary force in any civilized orderly society. In a state of Anarchy, however everyone has to guard life, liberty, and property and the lives of family members. Movement is severely restricted and arming everyone is necessary to protect ones property at all times. Civilized people have always hired someone to do the guarding, a sheriff, a police force, or some branch of government. Once law enforcement was in place, the people were freer. They could leave their property, work in the fields, and so on. In short, the proper amount of government makes everyone freer.

There are some who advocate Anarchy however not because they want no government but because they don’t like what they have. They use Anarchy as a tool for revolutionary change. The condition of Anarchy is very much like a vacuum where something rushes in to fill in. These calculating anarchist work to break down the existing government with rioting, killing, looting, and terrorism. Tragically, the people living in such chaos often go to those best able to put an end to it and beg them to take over and restore order. Who is best able to put an end to the chaos, the very people who started it? The anarchist who created the problem then creates a government run by them, an Oligarchy, where they have total power. This is exactly what happened in Russia that led to Lenin taking total power and in Germany where Hitler’s Brown Shirts created the chaos that brought him to power.

However, Anarchy isn’t a stable form of government; it’s a quick transition from something that exists to something desired by the power hungry. It’s a temporary condition and because it isn’t permanent, we eliminate it as well.

The word Democracy comes from two Greek words, Demos meaning People and Kratein meaning to Rule. Democracy therefore means the rule of the people, majority rule. This of course sounds good but suppose the majority decides to take away ones home or business, or children. Obviously, there has to be a limit. The flaw in Democracy is that the majority is not restrained. Persuading more than half the people to want something in a Democracy means they rule.

What about Republic? Well that comes from the Latin, Res, meaning thing and Publica, meaning public. It means the public thing, the law. A true Republic is one where the government is limited by law leaving the people alone.

America’s founders had a clean slate to write on. They could have set up an Oligarchy. In fact, there were some who wanted George Washington to be their King but the founding fathers knew history and they chose to give us the rule of law in a Republic, not the rule of the majority in a Democracy.

Why? Let’s demonstrate the difference in the setting of the old west. Consider a lynch mob in a Democracy. Thirty five horseback riders chase one lone gunman. They catch him. They vote thirty five to one to hang him. Democracy has triumphed and there is one less gunman to contend with. Now consider the same scenario in a Republic. The thirty five horseback riders catch the gunman and vote thirty five to one to hang him but the Sheriff arrives and he says you can’t kill him; he’s got his right to a fair trial. Therefore, they take the gunman back to town. A jury of his peers hear the evidence and the defense and they decide if he shall hang. Does the jury even decide by majority rule; no, it has to be unanimous or he goes free. The rights of the gunman aren’t subject to majority rule but to the law. This is the essence of a Republic.

Many Americans would be surprised to learn that the word Democracy does not appear in the Declaration of Independence or the U. S. Constitution. Nor does it appear in any of the Constitutions of the fifty states. The founders did everything they could to keep us from having a Democracy. James Madison, rightly known as the Father of the Constitution wrote in essay number ten of the Federalist papers, Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. Alexander Hamilton agreed and he stated, we are a Republican Government. Real liberty is never found in despotism or in the extremes of Democracy. Samuel Adams, signer of the Declaration of Independence, stated, Democracies never last long. It soon waste, exhaust, and murders itself. The founders had good reason to look upon Democracy with contempt because they knew that the Democracies in the early Greek city states produced some of the wildest excesses of government imaginable. In every case, they ended up with mob rule then anarchy and finally tyranny under an Oligarchy.

During that period in Greece there was a man named Solon who urged creation of a fixed body of law not subject to majority whims. While the Greeks never adopted Solon’s wise council, the Romans did. Based on what they knew of Solon’s laws they created the twelve tables of the Roman law and in effect built a Republic that limited government power and left the people alone. Since government was limited the people were free to produce with the understanding they could keep the fruits of their labor. In time, Rome became wealthy and the envy of the world.

In the mist of plenty, however the Roman people forgot what freedom entailed. They forgot that the essence of freedom is the proper limitation of government. When government power grows peoples’ freedom recedes.

Once the Romans dropped their guard power seeking politicians began to exceed the powers granted them in the Roman Constitution. Some learned that they could elect politicians who would use government power to take property from some and give it to others. Housing and welfare programs followed the introduction of agriculture subsidies. Inevitably, taxes rose and controls over the private sector were imposed. Soon, a number of Rome’s producers could no longer make ends meet and they went on the dole. Productivity declined, shortages developed and mobs began roaming the streets demanding bread and circuses from the government. Many traded freedom for security. Evidentially the whole system came crashing down. They went from a Republic to a Democracy and ended up with an Oligarchy under a progression of the Caesars.

Thus, Democracy itself is not a stable form of government. Instead, it is the gradual transition from limited government to the unlimited rule of an Oligarchy.

Knowing this, Americans ultimately have only two choices. We can keep our Republic as Franklin put it or we will inevitably end up with an oligarchy, a tyranny of the elite.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: american; form; government
This was taken from a very informative video titled The American Form of Government. I found the video to be important because it is clear and concise so that one may become adequately educated in less than ten minutes.

There are many links to this same video.

American Form of Government

American Form of Government

American Form of Government

American Form of Government

American Form of Government

American Form of Government

American Form of Government

I do not know the origin of the video. I examined two sites I had heard may by be the originators, American Sons of Liberty, and The John Birch Society but I was unable to verify either as the source of the video.

1 posted on 08/30/2009 1:21:53 PM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

AMERICA WAS INTENDED TO BE A REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC. I DO NOT KNOW WHAT IT IS NOW.


2 posted on 08/30/2009 1:26:20 PM PDT by jessduntno (Privatization + Inter-State Sales + Individual Policies + Tort Reform = Healthcare Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

Bookmarked


3 posted on 08/30/2009 1:44:44 PM PDT by I Hate Obama ("Life Is Like A Box of Chocolates, You Never Know What You're Gonna Get." -Forest Gump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
Democracy---That form of government whereby the common people know what they want and deserve to get it, good and hard.---H.L. Mencken.
4 posted on 08/30/2009 2:12:46 PM PDT by BluesDuke (The waste is a terrible thing to mind . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
The Scottish Jurist and Historian Sir Alex Fraser Tyler published a collection of lectures in 1801. He advanced a theory of democracy based on historical observation:
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can exist only until voters discover that they can vote themselves largesses from the public treasury. From that time on, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.

"The average age of the world's great civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependency; from dependency back again to bondage."


5 posted on 08/30/2009 2:23:02 PM PDT by upchuck (Neuter them in 2010 - Send them packing in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

It has morphed into a soft tyranny according to Dr. Levin.

A soft tyranny headed by a Marxist, who is staffing his administration with cheats, thugs, Communists and Alinskyites.

It is basically operating under one party rule and reported on by a complicit, state run media.


6 posted on 08/30/2009 2:36:09 PM PDT by Canedawg (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
The rights of the gunman aren’t subject to majority rule but to the law. This is the essence of a Republic.

the people have a perfect right to liberate themselves from Marxist oppression that is violating their indiviual natural God given rights

7 posted on 08/30/2009 2:46:54 PM PDT by mjp (pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, independence, limited government, capitalism})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Sir Alex Fraser Tyler

While the words are no less valid there is no record that they were penned by Sir Alex Fraser Tyler. Also worth noting is that his name is actually Sir Alex Fraser Tytler.

However, the words, regardless of who penned them, have great merit.

I also see parallels in Teddy Roosevelt observations.

"The Roman Republic fell, not because of the ambition of Caesar or Augustus, but because it had already long ceased to be in any real sense a republic at all. When the sturdy Roman plebeian, who lived by his own labor, who voted without reward according to his own convictions, and who with his fellows formed in war the terrible Roman legion, had been changed into an idle creature who craved nothing in life save the gratification of a thirst for vapid excitement, who was fed by the state, and who directly or indirectly sold his vote to the highest bidder, then the end of the Republic was at hand, and nothing could save it. The laws were the same as they had been, but the people behind the laws had changed, and so the laws counted for nothing.” Teddy Roosevelt on the Fall of the Republic

8 posted on 08/30/2009 3:02:52 PM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mjp
the people have a perfect right to liberate themselves from Marxist oppression that is violating their indiviual natural God given rights

Not one in a hundred outside of this forum have a clue as to what you are talking about. When government prohibits the free exercise of religion, forces medical personnel to participate in abortions, takes private property to give to another private party, restricts one's ability to defend oneself and family, criticize a pol before an election, it is clear that we are philosophically adrift and headed for dark times.

9 posted on 08/30/2009 3:09:01 PM PDT by Jacquerie (It is only in the context of Natural Law that the Declaration & Constitution form a coherent whole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

This was produced by the John Birch Society, been around for a while now, since 07 :) And your text is missing the rest of the entire videos, that looks like just the first segment. The rest of the series gets into economic stuff as well.

Entitled “Overview of America”

Part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTQQJOEn9yI

Part 2:
]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MW6AKVyi6As

Part 3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23JIFy8Vm6Q

Part 4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I16M-qH3SbU


10 posted on 08/30/2009 3:34:30 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar
Entitled “Overview of America”

I haven't time now to pay proper attention to these videos but a cursory look tells me they will prove as informative as the one I have viewed and posted about.

I had one input that the John Birch Society prepared the one I had seen but I found no reference on their web site.

Thank you for sharing, I look forward to viewing them.

11 posted on 08/30/2009 4:02:34 PM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson