Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Why would Obama need a "civilian army"? What is there to protect against that the US Military can't do?

More and more it seems as if Obama really is taking after Hitler, IMO.

Watch Beck tonight and see what he suggests we do about it.

1 posted on 08/28/2009 9:14:20 AM PDT by Lucky9teen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: Lucky9teen

First O wants a “civilian defense force” as powerful as the military.

Next he combines with ACORN, a criminal group, and moves the census (for the first time) under the auspices of the White House. Now we even hear that he plans to use our children aganst us.

Next he declares that the White House will be directly responsible for performing interrogations.

Now consider this....the Dems, with all the power they now hold, and all the hate they had for it....have yet to repeal the Patriot Act.

Sleep tight now.


2 posted on 08/28/2009 9:20:49 AM PDT by Grunthor (Every time one of them croaks, freedom is just that much more safe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

“Still hope you can contain them?” - Cabaret


3 posted on 08/28/2009 9:21:31 AM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen
Obama is, in fact, Hitler.

And we will need to throw him off, since there is no nation capable of defeating us.

Luckily, he has alienated both the military and police.

4 posted on 08/28/2009 9:22:07 AM PDT by Lazamataz (It's Claire Wolfe Time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

5 posted on 08/28/2009 9:22:28 AM PDT by paulycy (Screw the RACErs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

On another thread, some guy named “J Franks” wrote an article poo pooing the idea.

“It can’t happen”
“That’s not what he meant”
“It’s not really a threat”
etc.

He was even defending the “non-existant” threat in his comments section after the article.


6 posted on 08/28/2009 9:23:02 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen
Why would Obama need a "civilian army"?

For the same reason Hitler needed the SA and SS----to take and keep control.

The commie in the White House must be stopped. It is probably too late.

7 posted on 08/28/2009 9:23:15 AM PDT by cayuga (Caligula is in the White House. Where are the Praetorian Guard when you need them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

WHY do they need Government Health Care?
Why do they need a TSAR sub-government?
Why do they need a criminal organization to do the Census(ACORN)?
Why do they need access to you IRS records for Health CARE?
Why do they Need to crush free speech?

Anyone that doesn’t understand the nature of FASCISM, should run-not walk to the History of the 1930’s.


9 posted on 08/28/2009 9:24:12 AM PDT by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

BECK IS OUR PATRICK HENRY!


10 posted on 08/28/2009 9:24:24 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("It (Gov't) can't make you happier, healthier, wealthier, and wise" - Sarah Palin 07/26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen
I would love the Joint Chiefs to stand up and say NO. The constitution does not allow for the existence of such an Civilian Defense Force. And that the formation, arming and training of such a force would constitute a "Domestic Enemy". Further that the US Military, under its constitutional obligations, would disarm and disperse any such a force, by means judged appropriate under the circumstances.

Drawing the line in the sand, before the CDF is formed or funded, would probably give pause to a good many politicians. Many may give Obama what he wants if they are see it as just another pork project. Few would do so if they knew in advance in meant civil war. This alone is likely to prevent the CDFs formation. No Obama army, no fight.

Of course they won't do it. So in the end Obama will have his CDF and America will see fighting in its streets.
11 posted on 08/28/2009 9:25:31 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world, and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

Just what exactly is Obama’s AGENDA regarding the establishment of a civilian national security force, and WHY do we need one when we have our MILITARY?


12 posted on 08/28/2009 9:26:15 AM PDT by TheDailyChange (Politics,Conservatism,Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

Assimilation...yes, we can.


13 posted on 08/28/2009 9:26:48 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

Last night’s show scared the sh*t out of me. I asked my wife “Do you still wonder why I want more guns?” I’ll be tuning in tonight. I urge everyone to do the same and also join a local Tea Party, 9/12 Project group or the like if you haven’t already.


14 posted on 08/28/2009 9:27:56 AM PDT by manic4organic (We Are S0 Screwed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen
Watch Beck tonight and see what he suggests we do about it.

Well, elections have consequences. Hussein did say he wanted this Sicherheitsdienst before the election. Not much that can be done about it until 2010. Even then, given how good OKC was to Clinton's presidency, expect some sort of OKC repeat circa late 2011 or early 2012.

I hope all the purist Republicans who stayed at home Nov 2008 because their ideologically perfect candidate wasn't running are happy.

15 posted on 08/28/2009 9:28:18 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with these warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation — the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motives for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies?

No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer on the subject? Nothing.

We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves longer.

Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament.

Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne. In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope.

If we wish to be free — if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending — if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak — unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance, by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot?

Sir, we are not weak, if we make a proper use of the means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. Three millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us.

The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable — and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come!


16 posted on 08/28/2009 9:28:33 AM PDT by myself6 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen
I know that on "cash for clunkers" they didn't trust the dealers.

Yes, well......who would?

19 posted on 08/28/2009 9:30:21 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

What we have is an Obama “regime”, not an Obama “administration”...


20 posted on 08/28/2009 9:30:46 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (It's not an Obama "Administration"....it's a "Regime")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

Thank you for this post. I saw this thought provoking program last night. There were some insightful points made by all guests on the program last night and I will tune in today to see the further recommendations.
What is so shocking are the number of people who simply refuse to even look at the biographies of the people 0bama is putting in place as the czars and the powers they are being given.


25 posted on 08/28/2009 9:33:31 AM PDT by celtic gal (My Mob name is" Molly Maguire" per Hannity...we all need mob names !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen
I'm guessing that a civilian army may be used in a way the the military army is prohibited by law. So we would have a Geheime staatliche Polizei In addition to local police in your town there will be Federal police. Since they will be civilian they likely be un-uniformed..In another word, "spies".
29 posted on 08/28/2009 9:37:50 AM PDT by oyez ( damnant quod non intelligunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen
If he wants to be a dictator, he's going to need lots and lots of great big portraits to hang all over the country. I just happen to have one handy:

obama,Obama,Clown,Nope,politics,satire

36 posted on 08/28/2009 9:44:34 AM PDT by Flag_This (No, Massoud, there are no men left in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

view later


37 posted on 08/28/2009 9:44:42 AM PDT by Tahoe3002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson