The cave-painting signature seals the deal.
What I have been asking myself for the last 48 hours is: There is no way Dr. Keyes and Dr. Orly are going to ruin their reputations with something false. Therefore, I trust what they are doing.
Looks like the “original” may be a fake, too.
See
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images/DavidJeffreyBomfordBirthCertDoc65.jpg.
Someone posted this elsewhere:
I wanted to see if I could find any images of similar documents from Kenya around the same time period that could be compared to the certificate on the web. I spent several hours with Google image search on that before I decided to broaden my search outside of Kenya-specific documents.
It was some time later that I finally spotted a thumbnail on one of the results pages that looked very much like the Kenyan certificate. I pulled up the full size image and found that it was virtually EXACTLY the same type of document.
It was a scanned image of a “Certified Copy of Registration of Birth” dated in 1964 for a David Jeffrey Bomford on a genealogy website for the Bomford family. Except that David Jeffrey Bomford wasn’t born in Kenya, he was born in South Australia. But what was even more interesting was certain other features of the document as compared to the Kenya certificate.
The names of the registrar and the district registrar were the SAME NAMES as given in the Kenya certificate save for the first initials, i.e. G.H. Lavender and J.H. Miller in the Bomford document versus E.H. Lavender and M.H. Miller in the Kenya document.
Also, the book number (44B) and page number (5733) were the exactly the same on both documents.
The image of the Bomford certificate seems to prove beyond any doubt that not only is the Kenya certificate a fake, but that whomever faked it used the Bomford certificate as the template.
Good grief. I come back after taking a kayak paddle and walking the dogs, and now this.
I wonder if there’s any connection with the google warnings some people have been getting who visit Orly’s site?
Daughter (teenage freeper) dug up this information on the modification. It was created and modified on August 2nd, 2009, at 1:05:19 PM Eastern Time in Adobe Photoshop CS Windows. Gradient maps are different colors between the original and modified.
HOLY sh*T!!!
What I see is noise that is a result of digitization errors. K.F. from E.F. is a result of JPG errors or other averaging that software does.
PNG are supposed to be lossless.
The ‘original’ one posted in Breaking News still has the problem with the date of issuance vs. the date of the formation of the Republic of Kenya.
I don’t see the differences in those two copies. EF is EF, 47044 is 47044.
So, from where did WND’s example come? Just copied Orly’s or also had original that got modified?
bumpety bump
Orly is anything but stupid. She is not about to fall for the dems dimwit stunts! YOU GO GIRL!!!
This issue looks over.
Nice work my fellow New Jerseyan.
OK, wait a minute. Why is the original so much more low-resolution than the supposedly modified version?
Was there a higher-resolution photo of the original that got modified (but the photo of that original apparently wasn’t available to you to post)?
It makes no sense if we’re saying that that top photo was the one that was altered into the higher-resolution, much sharper fake on the bottom photo.
And I can see the difference between the “K” and “E,” but I sure can’t see a “6” instead of an “O” in the number. Even on max zoom level.
Folks:
The PACER document has ALWAYS been E.F. Lavender
It has NEVER been anything else.
I copied the Pacer pdf to my hard drive within two hours of it being posted to the Court and the current file and my file match.
Here is a link to the document as found on PACER that I just put up on Adobe’s sharing website:
https://share.acrobat.com/adc/document.do?docid=adc629e5-d94b-4bab-8988-13d274db22a1