Medved is a RINO. Why would I want to listen to him?
I can just imagine what he’s saying. Last time he spoke of it when I was listening he was very derisive and dismissive of _resident BC concerns.
He’s ripping the birthers pretty good.
Medved is again displaying the reason I no longer listen to him. He thinks the “Birthers” (Yes, I hate that term) are a bunch of loonies. Give Medved up. He is a lost cause.
There is a MASSIVE COORDINATED PUSH today by the State run media (probably led by the Obama administration's and DNC's talking points) to try and reframe the entire argument regarding the legitimacy of Obama to serve because he is not an American citizen (Absolutely no proof that he is one; no legitimate birth certificate and the fact that Obama has spent OVER A MILLION DOLLARS in legal fees to an army of lawyers all fighting the release of a $10 birth certificate.).
Obama's new ploy is to reframe the entire argument and to denigrate all of those seeking simple proof that he is legitimately qualified under the guidelines of the U.S. Constitution to serve as president of the United States and Commander and Chief by calling everyone seeking the truth: RACISTS.
Sorry DNC and Obamessiah, you and your State run media can scream "RACISTS" all you want but it isn't going to wash THIS TIME, the Constitution says you MUST be a natural born citizen in order to hold this office, it has NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE and EVERYTHING TO DO WITH UPHOLDING THE RULE OF LAW AND THE COSTITUTION.
I put Medved in the same box as George Will. Both were at one time fairly reliable supporters of Conservatives. No longer. Medved pushed hard for John McCain. That was enough for me. And I’m not surprised that he believes that the Birth Certificate issue hurts Republican -all of the liberal blogs are spouting that line. Face it, he’s a loser. Let him go. Boycott his show. Listen to Sean. He’s boring but at least he’s on our side fighting the good fight.
Medved is a country club RINO. He was for open borders and amnesty until his callers literally browbeat him into sometimes mentioning the need to secure the borders. He flunks the Quisling test.
|
Michael Medved may be an excellent film critic and have knowledge and highlights but he shows very little interest in the truth or knowledge of how to delve into it. He proves the point that Hollywood types consider themselves “the anointed” and have no need for evidence.
Medved thinks Christians who decry the secularization of Christmas are un-Christian, yet is not Christian himself.
Why should I listen to a word this egghead has to say as a result?
He’s as fond of the bithers as he is of the NO AMNESTY crowd. Typical dipsh*t RINO
Arrogant, dismissive smarty-pants who is disrespectful and derisive towards those who don’t display sufficient awe at his intellect.
Methinks Michael doth protest too much...
Why doesn't Obama just show the birth certificate and shut it down?
Who cares what that idiot says?
Radio personality goes "nuts." Neighbors call police.
Michael Medved Taken To Hospital. "Birthers"?
"What are 'birthers'? Last time this happen he was muddering 'amero corsi' or something like that."
oh no not His Highness again- he makes my blood pressure go up what a wacko
"Why do people who cover the birthers not bother to point out that where Obama was born is utterly irrelevant? His mother was an American. He was an American by definition as soon as he was born, regardless of where his mother physically was when she gave birth to him."— Walter Strapps
Walter,
You miss the central point of the birther argument. Obama can be a citizen but still no be a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution. Historically, a natural born citizen has been defined as a one born on U.S. soil to TWO citizen parents. Even the U.S. Foreign Affair manual, an official government document, warns those born abroad that while they are 100% citizens of the United States of America, they may not be natural born citizens eligible to hold the office of president. If our own executive branch is unsure who is and is not a natural born citizen, then we need a ruling by the SCOTUS to settle the matter once and for all.
The founding fathers clearly intended that the president meet a higher requirement than simply being a citizen of the U.S. The reason for that is they were concerned about the president possibly owing allegiance to a country other than the U.S.
Consider this. For the sake of discussion, assume that Vladimir John Doe is president. Assume that he was born on U.S. soil to an American citizen mother and an Russian citizen father. Vladimir has family in Russia. Tensions with Russia escalate to the point that Vladimir must declar war on his father's homeland. Can we trust Vladimir's allegiance to American enough to know with certainty that he will make decisions the in best interest of America regardless of the consequences to his family?
The answer is no. That's why the President of the United States of America must owe no allegiance, whatsoever, to any country other than the United States of America.
Take President Barack H. Obama out of the picture for the sake of discussion and fully the consider the consequences of the president not being a natural born citizen.