Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Craig v. United States: Citizenship Definition Case in 10th Circuit, SCOTUS Conference (huh?)
The Right Side of Life ^ | 7-6-2009 | Phil at Right Side of Life

Posted on 07/06/2009 7:57:07 PM PDT by Frantzie

Oklahoma resident and Plaintiff pro se Steven L. Craig has been pushing a little-known case through the American Judiciary wherein he is petitioning the United States government that the lack of a natural born citizenship definition combined with Congress’ unwillingness to specifically define the term should lead the Court to grant “[a]n immediate Order of Declaratory Judgement expressing Courts Opinion of the Constitutional and Legal Definition of ‘Natural born Citizen’.”

(Excerpt) Read more at therightsideoflife.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: constitution; obama; scotus
Huh? This is in the 10th Circuit and is awaiting SCOTUS conference on 9-29-2009. Confereence means at least 4 justices are needed to move it forward.

It looks like it is a case to define what citizenship is. Is the 10th Circuit is Oklahoma and neighboring states???

1 posted on 07/06/2009 7:57:07 PM PDT by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Asking the courts to legislate from the bench doesn’t seem like a good idea to me.


2 posted on 07/06/2009 8:04:45 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

I think he is asking SCOTUS to clarify, interpret or define not legislate.


3 posted on 07/06/2009 8:08:43 PM PDT by Frantzie (Remember when Bush was President and Americans had jobs (and ammo)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

This guy argues that it is the responsibility of Congress to define “Natural Born Citizen”. He clearly sees it as a legislative function.

He further argues that Congress has not performed its legislative duty. As a result, he wants the Judiciary to perform what he admits is a legislative function.


4 posted on 07/06/2009 8:11:34 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Oklahoma is in the 10th Circuit out of Colorado.


5 posted on 07/06/2009 8:14:42 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn/Rubio - Senate 2010 ! Sarah for President 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I’ve gone over 5 or 6 SCOTUS decisions from 1870 to 1952 and they do know what a natural born citizen is. SCOTUS does differentiated from native v. natural born.


6 posted on 07/06/2009 8:15:02 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
Unfortunately - I think it is Congress job to verify that O was eligible because the state elections director punted on that role in the election and it appears to vague at least in Hussein's case but others it was not vague.

On you second statement; I view it as a plea to the judiciary to check the power of the legislative branch that has FAILED in their duty. We have three branches of govt that are supposed to check the other’s powers. the citizen cannot go to the Executive because he is part of the fraud. The Legislative is obviously derelict in their duty and this is a plea to the Judicial branch to do their JOB.

7 posted on 07/06/2009 8:19:25 PM PDT by Frantzie (Remember when Bush was President and Americans had jobs (and ammo)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Read the last line on the article.


8 posted on 07/06/2009 8:31:44 PM PDT by taxtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Tenth Circuit is in Denver, but yes, in this area.


9 posted on 07/06/2009 8:39:45 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
ahh, its NOT legislation to ask the courts what the Constitution means.
10 posted on 07/06/2009 8:40:17 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I suggest people read the complaint it is very interesting and goes into the right of citizenship passed on from birth from citizens not foreigners....


11 posted on 07/06/2009 9:06:16 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
It does seem that defining "natural born citizenship" is interpretation of existing law.

How could it be legislating as others are expressing on this forum?

12 posted on 07/06/2009 9:16:58 PM PDT by TheThinker (America doesn't have a president. It has a usurper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEnaAZrYqQI


13 posted on 07/06/2009 9:41:58 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
The parties were supposed to ensure that their candidates were qualified (Sec of State of California. They failed to do so.

The Sec of State were supposed to ensure that persons being placed upon the ballots were qualified. They failed to do so.

The electoral college failed to check qualifications.

The congress approved the election result without pursuing the qualifications.

Various courts failed to stop the process and decide for upholding the qualifications requirement even when cases were brought asking them to do so.

When no one steps up, it is the responsibility of the people to do so.

14 posted on 07/06/2009 9:49:01 PM PDT by nufsed (. Stay away and I'll stay here. What else needs to be siad?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker
My view is we have three branches of govt - Executive, Judicial and Legislative. the law appears to be fairly clear but no one is enforcing it. Legislative has been TOTALLY derelict in their duty. He is executive and he is ignoring and using lawyers to cover it up. The public's plea is to the judiciary who appears to be ignoring the public. The state courts appear to not have jurisdiction except maybe Hawaii. The lower federal courts and Dept of Justice appear to be totally corrupt. This leaves SCOTUS and it appears they are either waiting for the right case or they do not have the courage. Or they are waiting for the public to start to turn on him enmasse before these cases finally get heard. The fourth possible branch of govt which Leo Donofrio I think said he found in Justice Scalia's writings is the Grand Jury. This is what these grand juries are attempting to do but I am not sure where that will go.
15 posted on 07/06/2009 10:31:35 PM PDT by Frantzie (Remember when Bush was President and Americans had jobs (and ammo)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

bfl


16 posted on 07/06/2009 10:35:35 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

If SCOTUS rules, Obama will continue as president.


17 posted on 07/07/2009 5:34:54 AM PDT by winkadink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson