Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COURT OVERTURNS SOTOMAYOR; SIDES WITH WHITE FIREFIGHTERS
Drudge ^ | 06/29/09

Posted on 06/29/2009 7:06:51 AM PDT by Abathar

COURT OVERTURNS SOTOMAYOR; SIDES WITH WHITE FIREFIGHTERS


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; bhojudicialnominees; commonsense; discrimination; firefighters; obamasracistjudge; preferences; ricci; ruling; scotus; shearacist; sheracist; sotomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 441-442 next last
To: Abathar

Awesome.


221 posted on 06/29/2009 8:05:58 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan (Who can take tomorrow, Spend it all today? Who can take your income And tax it all away? Obama Man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Although happy with the decision, this is one case that really should have been a 9-0 count. 5-4 is much too close and it gives the liberals cause to rejoice that Sotomayor had 4 Justices agree with her.


222 posted on 06/29/2009 8:07:21 AM PDT by nomoremods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley
Sadly you are correct

5 - 4

Fortunately still 5-4 with the wise Latina replacing the mistake from New Hampshire. Kennedy, Alito, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas.

223 posted on 06/29/2009 8:07:28 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Thanks for the link. I read over it, with particular attention on the dissenting opinion.

Their argument can be summed up as follows: performance disparity should never fall along racial lines, and if it does, it is clear evidence of a racially discriminatory performance measure. Other fire departments with similar demographic environments have successfully developed objective performance standards which result in equitable performance profiles when measured along racial lines. Whichever tests result in low racial inequality are tests that are non-discriminatory.

In an attempt to illustrate how institutional racism can sneak into the performance analysis, they cite that access to study materials is not uniform across racial lines, because most minority firefighters are first generation firefighters and have no kin network over which study materials and assistance can be provided. They cite that, in conjunction with the reported multi-week backorder for study materials from the publisher, this “legacy advantage” afforded to white second+ generation firefighters is partly responsible for the disparity in racial performance.

On another front, the dissent cites that consultations for test material were provided by the existing command structure, which is mostly white, thus permitting a potential avenue for the injection of racial bias into the test questions. Absent any criticism against a single particular question potentially loaded with racial bias, the dissent instead outlines that a noted professional in firefighter performance analysis believes that the relative weight of test components should have been subject to external consultation; such consultation would have presumably resulting in a higher weighting for oral/physical test components which uniformly show higher relative performance by racial minorities compared to written test questions (and, as is fashionable in some education circles, the validity of written test questions as a performance measure for potential job performance is doubted - when the results are socially inconvenient).

Altogether a predictable dissent. They cannot find an individual who was wronged in any concrete way, but have no trouble identifying discrimination against a group. They cannot find a single element of the performance measure which is potentially racially loaded, but can toss the entire assessment because the results are inconvenient. This is your brain on the left-wing mental retardation endemic across college campuses since the 1960’s.


224 posted on 06/29/2009 8:08:13 AM PDT by M203M4 (A rainbow-excreting government-cheese-pie-eating unicorn in every pot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Kennedy has been going with the conservatives more and more

Kennedy has expressed his liking for scotus as it was before O'connor left. He was always very conservative until she left and was replaced by alito. After O'connor left, he decided that alito would replace kennedy, while he would replace o'connor as the swing vote.

By the way, souter voted not to overturn sotomayer so sotomayer replacing souter changes nothing.

225 posted on 06/29/2009 8:08:24 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Sotot is a racist bitch!


226 posted on 06/29/2009 8:08:28 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

LOLing here ...

flipped to MS-O-NBC .. quite a sight.
New jerk on the block, Dylan Ratigan interviewing
Rather Dan, who’s certain that Sonia will
be confirmed... ‘she’ll sail through’ ...

Talk about the blind leading the feeble.


227 posted on 06/29/2009 8:08:59 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
"SCOTUS Thows Sotomayor Under The Bus."

"SCOTUS Throws Sotomayor Under The Bus" driven by Rosa Parks.
228 posted on 06/29/2009 8:09:19 AM PDT by LeoOshkosh (Crazy Leo is right again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

testing to see if I’m posting.


229 posted on 06/29/2009 8:09:44 AM PDT by Woebama (Paying for my neighbor's mortgage and Wall Street's bonuses sure is hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi; TomGuy

Megan was right on it .. and visibly animated.


230 posted on 06/29/2009 8:09:53 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

I suspect there could be some repercussions over this. Hopefully tempers will remain in check.

Judge Kennedy did the right thing in this case. It is sad we still have a court where 4 justices would rule in favor or so blatant and injustice. If the majority had gone the other way it would have been another sign that this nation is going downhill.


231 posted on 06/29/2009 8:09:54 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: MAD-AS-HELL

This will make no difference to the liberals whatsoever. They have at least a 10 vote majority in the Senate...Even if they wanted to...the GOP could not filibuster.

Actually...she will only be replacing Empty Souter....notice how he voted on this....one liberal for another.

Souter=George H. W. Bush’s single worst appointment.


232 posted on 06/29/2009 8:11:28 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb; St. Louis Conservative
....so much for the richness of latina wisdom. Of course, that’s something only she can fully understand /s.....


233 posted on 06/29/2009 8:11:41 AM PDT by Liz (When people fear govt, we have tyranny; when govt fears the people, we have freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Hey, how are you feeling?


234 posted on 06/29/2009 8:12:05 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan; All

“Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the dissenting opinion, which was joined by John Paul Stevens, Stephen Breyer and retiring David Souter. “The white firefighters who scored high on New Haven’s promotional exams understandably attract this court’s sympathy,” she wrote.

“But they had no vested right to promotion. Nor have other persons received promotions in preference to them.”

Ginsburg went on to argue that it is through the “backdrop of entrenched inequality that the promotion process at issue in this litigation should be assessed.”

http://ninthjustice.nationaljournal.com/2009/06/supreme-court-reverses-sotomay.php

~~~

Asinine, twisted logic.


235 posted on 06/29/2009 8:14:00 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Wasn’t her ruling an upholding of an earlier court?


236 posted on 06/29/2009 8:14:08 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie

Not an embarrassment, an incentive to restructure the court. Scalia is the oldest of the constructionists, and thus more vulnerable to develop a heath condition which forces retirement. Kennedy could tire of being the Court’s swing vote and retire as well. Either case leaves the court as the third branch of the Obama coup.


237 posted on 06/29/2009 8:14:56 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

I don’t know if this can derail the Quota Queen, but it is a blow for the concept of merit.


238 posted on 06/29/2009 8:15:09 AM PDT by TheThinker (America doesn't have a president. It has a usurper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Kennedy was the swing vote. Kudos.


239 posted on 06/29/2009 8:16:32 AM PDT by sono (Allahu FUBAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

This thread is not updating. It is stuck, as well as- I think the rest of FR.


240 posted on 06/29/2009 8:17:03 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 441-442 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson