Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Women look away more from abnormal babies
AP-Yahoo! ^ | 24 June 2009 | LAURAN NEERGAARD

Posted on 06/24/2009 10:18:44 AM PDT by greatdefender

WASHINGTON – Puzzling new research suggests women have a harder time than men looking at babies with facial birth defects. It's a surprise finding. Psychiatrists from the Harvard-affiliated McLean Hospital, who were studying perceptions of beauty, had expected women to spend more time than men cooing over pictures of extra-cute babies. Nope.

Instead, the small study being published Wednesday raises more questions than it can answer.

First the background: The McLean team already had studied men and women looking at photos of adults' faces on a computer screen. They rated facial beauty, and could do various keystrokes to watch the photos longer. A keystroke count showed men put three times more effort into watching beautiful women as women put into watching handsome men.

Lead researcher Dr. Igor Elman wondered what else might motivate women. Enter the new baby study.

This time 13 men and 14 women were shown 80 photos of babies, 30 of whom had abnormal facial features such as a cleft palate, Down syndrome or crossed eyes. Participants rated each baby's attractiveness on a scale of zero to 100, and used keystrokes to make the photo stay on the screen longer or disappear faster.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: abnormal; babies; psychology; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 06/24/2009 10:18:44 AM PDT by greatdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

I suppose that this survey was conducted only with ugly democrat women..I do not turn my head away from any little baby.


2 posted on 06/24/2009 10:22:47 AM PDT by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender
Men stare and go “Whoa, that kid looks like Lyndon Johnson”, ladies, politely look away.
3 posted on 06/24/2009 10:25:00 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender
I don't find this surprising at all. Women look at babies entirely differently from men. I heard it explained once that woman are toward babies like men are toward sex. A woman likes a baby anytime, anywhere. But they can take it or leave it when it comes to sex. A man is just the opposite. Take it or leave it when it's a baby, but it's sex anytime, anywhere. It makes perfect sense that it's this way. If either sex were just like the other there would be no babies or way too many babies. It's God's way of keeping our species going.

A woman puts herself in the mother's position when she sees an abnormal baby and can't bear the thought. A man, OTOH, see the child as much more of an object, with much less emotional attachment. Just like when a man sees a great 1957 restored Chevrolet convertible involved in a collision!

I never cease to be amazed at how much money is spent coming to conclusions that are a surprise to educated people but ho-hum to old guys like me!

4 posted on 06/24/2009 10:25:48 AM PDT by jwparkerjr (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

Years ago as a kid, I used to visit a wheelchair-bound parapeligic man (diabetes) on weekends to play chess and other games with him. One of the first things he did when I started doing this was sit me down to look at his stumps. He wiggled them for me and answered every question that I had about his condition.

It really helped me get comfortable and get over any handicap phobia that I may have had.

The man is passed away, but I will always remember what he did for me.


5 posted on 06/24/2009 10:28:25 AM PDT by Owl558 ("Those who remember George Satayana are doomed to repeat him")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

Gee, maybe women are more emotional than men.


6 posted on 06/24/2009 10:28:25 AM PDT by donna (American height: (Men 5' 9.6") (Women 5' 4.3") Movies: The Reverse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

There’s no photo of me prior to my third day—so ugly the camera kept breaking (true story)—but I don’t recall my mother avoiding me any more than my father.

Dr. Elman’s hypothesis is possible, but I think that Dr. Grant is right thast it’s overreaching as a conclusion. There are MANY other possibilities, such as longer residual visual memory ability in women...thus, men need to keep looking at images longer.

And if we just jump to the “empathy” conclusion, etc., then we’re acting rather arrogant about our supposed knowledge. That mindset would have kept Orville and Wilbur working on bicycles.


7 posted on 06/24/2009 10:33:59 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna
Gee, maybe women are more emotional than men.

Why would that explain women looking less at cute babies?!

8 posted on 06/24/2009 10:36:04 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

I hacve a cousin who was born in the late 60’s who had a double clift lip and cleft palate. I remember what he looked like for the first year and I know his Mother who was 19 when he was born had a very hard time with it. I was I think 8yo when he was born and remember Mom talking with us for days before we went to visit getting us ready for what we were going to see. I thought he had the blueist eyes I’d ever seen but I have to be honest and say that first glance it was hard not to gasp.


9 posted on 06/24/2009 10:49:29 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

A million reasons: Women know the pain of looking different, mother’s worry about having 6-toed babies, what did the mother do wrong, will the father blame the mother, will the mother-in-law be mean, will the baby suffer medically . . .

Babies are a bundle of every emotion a woman can have - good and bad. I can feel the angst just talking about it! I’m going to cry now.


10 posted on 06/24/2009 10:53:29 AM PDT by donna (American height: (Men 5' 9.6") (Women 5' 4.3") Movies: The Reverse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: donna

There are places in the world where the mother can be abandoned or the child killed for looking wrong, or just for being the wrong gender.
Thus not looking at a child with a deformity is the least of the child’s concerns in most of the world - being allowed to live and being provided for are.


11 posted on 06/24/2009 11:17:26 AM PDT by tbw2 (Freeper sci-fi - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

12 posted on 06/24/2009 11:18:03 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido; MotleyGirl70; Cagey

Carol: Isn't he gorgeous? (Elaine looks at baby, only to be frightened and turn away)

Elaine: Ugghh.

Carol: Is she gorgeous? (Elaine + Jerry looking away)

13 posted on 06/24/2009 11:25:32 AM PDT by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna

You didn’t answer the question.
I asked about the ones rated as attractive, not deformed.


14 posted on 06/24/2009 11:33:12 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB

He look like Mr. Bean


15 posted on 06/24/2009 11:40:04 AM PDT by greatdefender (If You Want Peace.....Prepare For War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

Maybe because they do not want to appear rude by staring.


16 posted on 06/24/2009 11:42:05 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Oh, I thought you meant all babies are cute.

Didn’t the men and women spend the same time looking at the attractive babies? I don’t understand your question.


17 posted on 06/24/2009 11:42:49 AM PDT by donna (American height: (Men 5' 9.6") (Women 5' 4.3") Movies: The Reverse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
I think the fact that the study was comprised of only 13 men and 14 women makes the resulting conclusions a bit tenuous.
18 posted on 06/24/2009 11:58:43 AM PDT by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan

One of the many reasons. :-)


19 posted on 06/24/2009 12:00:50 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

20 posted on 06/24/2009 12:00:50 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson