Bird breathing anatomy breaks dino-to-bird dogma

CMI ^ | June 16, 2009 | Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D.

[GodGunsGuts]

Do we eat Kentucky Fried Dinosaur? According to the dogma of many evolutionary propagandists for the last decade or so, indeed we do—they believe that birds evolved from the carnivorous dinosaur group known as theropods. Yet there are many problems with this idea. And now, new research into the birds’ lung and leg anatomy provides more strong evidence against it...

[GodGunsGuts]

Ping!

[chemical_boy]

So its back to kentucky fried mystery meat?

[blowfish]

Thanks for the laugh! Another unjustified conclusion at the end of a sensationalized article, typical for creation.com.

[April Lexington]

The evidence against evolution just keeps stacking up.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[April Lexington]

YOu know what really blows my mind? I'll tell ya.... People all over the world read Harry Potter and truly believe in magical powers to manipulate matter, create matter out of this air, etc. But, just tell them G-d did that through creation and they are ready to hang you!

[qam1]

Let me see if I got this one right

Birds didn’t evolve from theropod Dinosaurs but instead evolved from an earlier ancestor millions of years before, therefore that means the earth is only 6,000 years old

Yeah, makes sense to me

[GodGunsGuts]

[UCANSEE2]

There is nothing wrong with evolution. All species adapt to changing environment.

There is nothing wrong with creationism, because it all had to ‘begin’ somewhere, sometime.

I still don’t see why there is a big argument.

[ciwwaf]

Better written than the other articles but still full of lies. Don’t have time to point them all out right now but:

“claimed “feathered dinosaur ancestors” Sinosauropteryx

Sinosauropteryx is classified as a NON-avian feathered dinosaur.

Good try this time.

[blowfish]

This apparently passes for science in creation-ville.

[GodGunsGuts]

That’s because they love the idea of manipulating creation, but they hate the idea of accountability. If it reminds you of the mentality of a 5 year old, well...

[UCANSEE2]

therefore that means the earth is only 6,000 years old

This is true.

You must also realize that God created everything in 6 days.

You take 6 (of God's) days, then multiply it times 6000 years, and you'll get the same kind of time expanse that science claims for the age of the Earth.

[April Lexington]

Absolutely. Read the flaming posts soon to follow. These people would eat garbage if the Pinko Central fax machine told them it was good for the Earth and hurt Republicans...

[April Lexington]

I wonder what grilled Liberal tastes like???

[UCANSEE2]

Looks like a chicken to me.

[going hot]

I see you are nearing perfection, Bravo.

[UCANSEE2]

This apparently passes for science in creation-ville.

You should see what passes for science at a Global Warming Convention.

[UCANSEE2]

The evidence against evolution just keeps stacking up.

Is it against 'evolution', or against the concept that humans mutated from some lower life form?