Is it against 'evolution', or against the concept that humans mutated from some lower life form?
Wow! That is really hard to say. While I am usually a firm believer in creationism, I have come to conclude that Obama is truly decended from apes...
Is it against 'evolution', or against the concept that humans mutated from some lower life form?
That's a very fair question. In fact, there is lots of evidence for evolution, if by "evolution" we simply mean "change over time".
The problem is that the clearest examples of "change over time", i.e., "evolution," are commonplace and are not of the Darwinian sort (meaning, there's no random mutation occurring, with a mysterious and unobserved "natural selection" plucking out a few of the mutants to be lucky survivors). Embryonic development, for example, is clearly "change over time": you start with a single cell, and over time, it changes completely into something else. The process, however, runs according to a code; something much more similar to a computer program than to any random process envisioned by Darwinists.