Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Queen is urged to press a new Prime Minister to call a swift general election
Daily Telegraph ^ | June 5, 2009 | Andrew Pierce

Posted on 06/05/2009 8:22:02 AM PDT by C19fan

As the chances of Mr Brown surviving faded after the decision of the Work and Pensions Secretary to time the announcement of his departure as polls for European and local elections closed, the monarch will now consult her most senior advisers if Mr Brown loses his fight to stay in office.

While the Queen still technically has the power to dissolve Parliament, in reality she only advises her prime ministers. It would be unprecedented for a second prime minister to move into 10 Downing Street without a general election.

..............................................

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: brown; dissolve; parliament; queen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 06/05/2009 8:22:02 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

We will we will rock you!


2 posted on 06/05/2009 8:26:18 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Imagine Her Majesty taking to the telly for a one sentence address:

[ahem] “We believe it is time for dissolution of Parliament and that it is incumbent upon the Prime Minister to do so at the earliest possible time.”


3 posted on 06/05/2009 8:26:28 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

This topic came up a few weeks ago in another UK paper and the comments were overwhelmingly in favor of Her Majesty dissolving parliament.
She thrown in a “We are not amused.” LOL!!


4 posted on 06/05/2009 8:29:58 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
She thrown in a “We are not amused.”

Wait: A gag, or it was really her?

5 posted on 06/05/2009 8:32:03 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I meant it as a gag. Forget to type the word “should”. That would be a riot wouldn’t it!


6 posted on 06/05/2009 8:33:02 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

If Labour seats a new PM for even a month or three before a general election it might pull their bacon out of the fire. It’s not just that Brown has made some unpopular decisions it’s that he has all the charisma of a frozen lump of seaweed.

I’m not sure what we would get with Cameron either.


7 posted on 06/05/2009 8:35:25 AM PDT by TomOnTheRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Quite.




LOL

8 posted on 06/05/2009 8:38:03 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“It would be unprecedented for a second prime minister to move into 10 Downing Street without a general election.”

Interesting reminder the current PM was never elected.


9 posted on 06/05/2009 8:49:30 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't have to say much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

That’s not unprecedented in parliamentary systems. Rather common in fact.

Don’t forget that when you walk into a ballot box in a Westminster system you are usually voting for a party and not a candidate.


10 posted on 06/05/2009 9:05:31 AM PDT by TomOnTheRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Their system seems to be much more transparent than ours. 0 wouldn’t survive the equivalent of their Prime Ministers Question Time. The session are aired publicly and cannot be buried by the MSM/SRM making it very difficult for a liar or facist to gain power like the POS we have. Also, what do we know about congress’s expense reports?


11 posted on 06/05/2009 9:05:40 AM PDT by balls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Michael Savage brings down the British Government! Bravo! Rockstar and vodka for everyone!


12 posted on 06/05/2009 9:10:44 AM PDT by FreepShop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomOnTheRun

Gordon Brown reminds me of Terry Jones half-witted brother, and we all know that Terry was the least talented of the Pythonites.


13 posted on 06/05/2009 9:19:11 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

bttt


14 posted on 06/05/2009 9:19:21 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Sometimes I think the Queen ought to demote Parliament to an advisory position, start to actually rule from the throne and let heads roll—literally—until England gets it's collective crap together.

I wonder what kind of support she'd get from the traditionally English people, and by “traditionally English” I mean to exclude the media, the politicians and the immigrants.

15 posted on 06/05/2009 9:28:02 AM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

And for a parting gift, Gordon Brown gets 25 DVDs he can’t watch....


16 posted on 06/05/2009 9:56:42 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Aren’t we being a little unkind to Terry Jones’s brother and frozen lumps of seaweed here?

Perhaps I should have said he has the charisma of a dead weasel. At least the weasel isn’t alive to get angry about the comparison ;>


17 posted on 06/05/2009 10:24:16 AM PDT by TomOnTheRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: balls

It might have stopped Obama but - in all fairness - Bush wouldn’t have survived question time either. He wasn’t quick enough with his tongue or his wit. Question time has it’s advantages but it tends to elevate people who can make witty comebacks over people that are actually serious thinkers with slower tongues. Especially in the modern media age.


18 posted on 06/05/2009 10:27:15 AM PDT by TomOnTheRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“Unprecedented” seems to be in vouge these days, so why not.


19 posted on 06/05/2009 12:51:05 PM PDT by ex91B10 (The only response now is mass resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomOnTheRun
Question Time would have saved us a lot of pain with Bush II. His dad would have survived, but there would have been no hint of a Bush dynasty. Quick thinking and excellent communications skills are at least fifty percent of the requirements for office. The other fifty percent is the meat. Question Time is the quality control and accounting for these requrements, and that's what we are missing.

0, Bush, Churchill and Brown are great examples to use to test this hypothesis. Also, Question Time would be exactly the right place to ask about the birth certificate.

20 posted on 06/05/2009 12:57:55 PM PDT by balls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson