Skip to comments.
Judge Bans Bible from Pennsylvania Kindergarten Show and Tell
Foxnews ^
| 6/1/2009
| Staff
Posted on 06/02/2009 6:40:54 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA
PHILADELPHIA A U.S. court says a kindergartner's mother cannot read Scripture during show and tell, even if the Bible is the boy's favorite book.
Monday's ruling is a victory for the Marple Newtown School District in suburban Philadelphia.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals says the school's decision does not violate First Amendment rights given the nonpublic nature of the classroom and the tender age of the children.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: bible; christianstudents; kindergarten; ruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Mr. Lucky
Maybe where you live. I’ve lived in a number of places with no private school of any sort.
21
posted on
06/02/2009 6:59:53 AM PDT
by
Mr Rogers
(I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
To: Mr. Lucky
You are missing the point. The parent is already paying to have her child go to school...it's called taxation.
We are rapidly approaching the time when the citizens are going to be forced to take action against these judges through extra-judicial means. Some of these Liberal, America and God hating judges need to be taken out of their offices and hung in the public square...not that I would ever advocate such an action.
22
posted on
06/02/2009 7:00:16 AM PDT
by
Sudetenland
(Liz Cheney for President!.)
To: Red in Blue PA
This judge violated the First Amendment, and should be taken to task. He, of all people, is forbidden to rule either for or against religion.
23
posted on
06/02/2009 7:00:50 AM PDT
by
GingisK
To: Mr. Lucky
Right with ya. Both kids, Catholic Schools 8 years worth. This judge fits the mold of educated way beyond his intelligence. They see the 1st ammendment as “freedom from religion”.
Change.
24
posted on
06/02/2009 7:01:50 AM PDT
by
Texas resident
(Texan by birth and by choice.)
To: Red in Blue PA
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals says the school's decision does not violate First Amendment rights given the nonpublic nature of the classroom and the tender age of the children. Ping for later
To: Mr Rogers
>>Maybe where you live. Ive lived in a number of places with no private school of any sort.<<
I homeschool for 150.00 a year. CD-Rom based.
And the nice thing about homeschooling is it doesn’t have to be 9-5.
I know single moms who get the kids work done when they are home. Understanding that my girls are two years ahead and get their work done in three hours, anyone can homeschool.
26
posted on
06/02/2009 7:06:55 AM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
To: Red in Blue PA
“Monday’s ruling is a victory for the Marple Newtown School District in suburban Philadelphia.”
It is a loss, however, for the entire planet.
Spirit takes another one in the neck. How long before the Center of Spirit decides to strike back?
To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; Ciexyz; ...
I don’t have all that much of a problem with the decision in that the matter should be left up to the principal.
What is concerning is that if the principal did decide to allow the reading, would the court have backed him up? I doubt it.
And would the principal have as aggressively intervened if the Muslim parent read from the Koran or a Jewish parent read from Exodus? I’m not so sure.
28
posted on
06/02/2009 7:07:15 AM PDT
by
Tribune7
(Better to convert enemies to allies than to destroy them)
To: Sudetenland
>>You are missing the point. The parent is already paying to have her child go to school...it’s called taxation. <<
Truth be told.
But I consider it a wash. I’m actually educating the other skulls full of mush so my kids don’t have to deal with a bunch of dummies when they are older.
But I educate my own kids.
29
posted on
06/02/2009 7:08:41 AM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
To: Sudetenland
OK, so she's made her value judgment. Her tax rate is more important than her children's Christian education. If you'll excuse the metaphor, this seems a little bit like someone refusing to leave the
Titanic because they paid so much for the price of a first class ticket.
Look, the judge is an arrogant self centered pig whose ruling finds no support whatever in the Constitution or the original intent of the founders. But, this mother has the ability to immediately remove her children from this Godless (no, anti-God) environment and then has the rest of her life to do battle with navel gazing judges.
To: Red in Blue PA
I guess I would want to know more about the facts in this case. I know if the kid's favorite book were the Koran, I wouldn't just not want it read to my five year-old, I would want the Koran kid expelled.
ML/NJ
31
posted on
06/02/2009 7:09:29 AM PDT
by
ml/nj
To: Red in Blue PA
How can a school district be of a
nonpublic nature?
The activist judges had to reaaaaaaly stretch credulity on that one.
32
posted on
06/02/2009 7:09:33 AM PDT
by
rvoitier
(John Boehner--Neville Chamberlin of the 21st century.)
To: Dr.Syn
lol, see #32.
What's going on here is anti-Christian activist judges and they were going to rule against the boy, by taking away his 1st Amendment rights, one way or the other / by hook or by crook.
33
posted on
06/02/2009 7:12:28 AM PDT
by
rvoitier
(John Boehner--Neville Chamberlin of the 21st century.)
To: Red in Blue PA
Monday's ruling is a victory for the Marple Newtown School District in suburban Philadelphia. If Monday's ruling is a victory for the Marple Newtown School District in suburban Philadelphia, then the Marple Newtown School District in an Enemy of the Republic.
At this point in the decline of our Republic, why mince words? Tell the truth: They are an Enemy of the Republic.
34
posted on
06/02/2009 7:12:46 AM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
To: 2banana
you are KIDDING? that is insanity!
35
posted on
06/02/2009 7:14:23 AM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: Red in Blue PA
36
posted on
06/02/2009 7:17:47 AM PDT
by
coop71
(Being a redhead means never having to say you're sorry...)
To: Red in Blue PA
Monday's ruling is a victory for Sentences I didn't finish.
37
posted on
06/02/2009 7:17:52 AM PDT
by
mc5cents
(Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
To: savedbygrace
You are right. And I’d bet anything that this same judge wouldn’t have a problem with these children of “tender years” being read to from “Heather Has Two Mommies” or the like.
38
posted on
06/02/2009 7:18:11 AM PDT
by
mrsmel
(Put the Gitmo terrorists near Capitol Hill.)
To: mc5cents
It’s a temporary victory for Satan and his minions. It’s only temporary, because his time is getting short. His wrath is increasing in light of that knowledge.
39
posted on
06/02/2009 7:19:54 AM PDT
by
mrsmel
(Put the Gitmo terrorists near Capitol Hill.)
To: coop71
Is that a rhetorical question?
40
posted on
06/02/2009 7:20:49 AM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(http://ccwsaveslives.blogspot.com/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson