Posted on 05/06/2009 7:47:05 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I hope I am proven wrong.
I hope for the sake of our country that I and many other concerned citizens across the country are looked upon as well-intentioned but ultimately misguided individuals who chased a bad rumor based on lies and distortions.
The reason I hope to be thought wrong (although well-intentioned) is because the price of being right about the constitutional requirements to be president not being met by the current occupant of the Oval Office is too disturbing to be imagined.
If, in fact, Barack Obama does not meet the requirements set out by the U.S. Constitution in Article II, Section I, it would throw this country into a constitutional crisis. Vice President Joe Biden would, obviously, become President Biden. The harrowing part of this taking place is that every appointment made, every piece of legislation signed, and every executive order issued by Barack Obama could, and should, be considered invalid.
Full-moon time? I know, I know; I sound like a raving lunatic. So where do I draw my conclusions that this is even a valid issue to entertain?
Let's review what's been accepted as "fact" by the mainstream press and the vast majority of Americans: Barack Hussein Obama was born on August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Stanley Ann Dunham, 18, and Barack Obama Sr., 25.
Now let's look at some of the questions challenging these accepted "facts":
Concerned citizens across the United States since well before the November election have questioned Barack Obama's "natural born" qualification for the presidency. From sea to shining sea, at least 18 lawsuits with plaintiffs including a former presidential candidate, a former deputy attorney general, state legislators and retired and active duty members of the military, are attempting to compel him to verify his citizenship.
Candidate Obama's own Web site, fightthesmears.com, posted a "Certification of Live Birth," which, according to the Web site, proves that Obama is in fact a natural born U.S. citizen. What the Web site won't tell you, however, is that a "Certification of Live Birth" is not a birth certificate, and that at the time, the state of Hawaii allowed foreign-born children of U.S. citizens (Stanley Ann Dunham) to have their births registered with this document based on a statement of only one relative. The obvious question must be asked: If Obama has an original "long form" birth certificate issued on the day of his birth by the state of Hawaii, why would he also have a "Certification of Live Birth"? It would not be necessary. Critics have called upon President Obama to just give the state of Hawaii his permission to release his original "long form" birth certificate. The "long form" birth certificate would include all the pertinent information about his birth: name of the hospital, name and signature of the attending physician and a seal of the Hawaiian Health Department. This simple action by President Obama would immediately end all speculation about his citizenship and the reasons for the various lawsuits. Instead, President Obama is spending time and money hiring lawyers to fight these lawsuits. Why?
Why doesn't the mainstream press cover these lawsuits? I mean, in 2004, Dan Rather did a bang up job covering something a lot less important. Rather had "authentic" memos critical of President George W. Bush's Texas Air National Guard service record. Yet there are some legitimate questions about the constitutional eligibility of our president, and yet not one single major press outlet is covering it. Part of the reason is that this issue has supposedly settled by the independent authority on Obama's birth certificate, FactCheck.org. Yet on their Web site, FactCheck.org states:
"The document is a 'certification of birth,' also known as a short-form birth certificate. The long form is drawn up by the hospital and includes additional information such as birth weight and parents' hometowns. The Hawaii Department of Health's birth record request form does not give the option to request a photocopy of your long-form birth certificate. We tried to ask the Hawaii DOH why they only offer the short form, among other questions, but they have not given a response."
So the independent authority on this question has admitted that they have not seen the original long-form birth certificate. And the questions remain.
I sincerely hope that Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, in 1961 and therefore meets the constitutional requirements to be president. If not, our Constitution must be followed and procedures put in place for future elections wherein all candidates on the ballot must prove they meet the requirements set forth by the law of the land, the U.S. Constitution.
***********
Peter Aparicio is a resident of Victoria and a government teacher at Memorial High School.
Many of us pray that somehow God will intervene to alter our course and save us from our ways. And others who don't have faith or belief, none the less are committed to bringing about the same thing. These are certainly interesting times.
.
Take a look at this. If you didn’t know it was Malcolm X, you’d swear it was Obama:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENHP89mLWOY
.
Payback’s a b!tch.
Did you see the footage of the Electoral College vote where someone was going to object, but Pelosi didn’t give them a chance and declared obama the prez?
I think the one area everyone keeps also forgetting about, besides with his birth certificate, is his little trip he made to Pakistan from Indonesia.
If Nobama was of legal age, and he flew from Indonesia to Pakistan on an INDONESIAN passport, he has then also given up any US Citizenship he may have had.
Even though my parents were born in the Netherlands, and I decided I wanted to fly on a Dutch Passport, I would have to give up my US Passport.
My scenario guess is that the supposed copy O bow ma claimed to have discovered among papers in his gran’s attic will be what surfaces, giving him plausible deniability if the forgery is outed ... ‘he took it to be genuine never expecting gran to fake his history!’
“How could anyone in good conscious even run for POTUS knowing they did not meet constitutional requirements?
Simply by not having a conscience. Just like any dictator, crook, Marxist, or leftist-extremist.”
Barack Obama shows all the signs of a malignant narcissist, simple as that. Google it and you shall see...
Why do people think that the father is Frank “the commie pedophile” Davis?
If the father is in question, it could be anyone.
How about SOME school teachers are not smart? Only say this because I am one, and I do not consider myself dumb!
“Those that can do, those that can’t teach!!!!”
Just two questions: Who taught you? What do you do?
“Arrest and deport the illegal alien from Kenya!!!”
I am all for it! But so far the place of his birth is not known. If Obama was born on US soil he would be a US citizen but not a “natural born” US citizen because his father was not a US citizen at the time of Obama’s birth.
O bow ma moved forward his scehdule for Pres__ential power/taking over America when it became obvious that the one obstacle who could out him was about to pass away. He successfully sequestered her until she conveniently died and opened his gate.
Fitting and proper. For 0bama, it has a Presidential ring to it.
Well written for sure.
That is the smoking gun for all of this discussion. Obama has sealed his birth records, his school records, and anything and everything else that can incriminate him.
Anyone who has nothing to hide in these areas would never think to do this...for it would not be NECESSARY!
Obama has more than one thing to hide, in my opinion. He knows he is Frank Marshall Davis, Jr. and not Barack Obama, Jr. But, being the later has opened up more doors for him.
The passport question is being hidden. I am sure that there were records of his citizenship in the passport office, but they have probably been altered, too.
His college and law school records have been sealed. Why?
From the beginning, I have looked at him with suspicion for many reasons. Something about him simply speaks of untruth. My instincts are usually right, and I trust my instincts more than I would ever trust him.
I don’t see that in the video of the event. Am I missing something?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaE5NGgLtxo
Religion was not something listed on birth certificates for the state of HI at that time. If he was indeed born ouside of the country to an unmarried mother he would be qualified under the immigration laws(immigration laws which were in effect as far back as the 1930’s IIRC) at that time to serve as President of the U.S.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.