Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Long Precambrian Fuse Gets Longer (...and then BANG!...all major body plans in an instant)
CEH ^ | April 28, 2009

Posted on 04/29/2009 8:27:54 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

The Long Precambrian Fuse Gets Longer

April 28, 2009 — Why did complex multicellular life explode on the scene some 550 million years ago?  That’s mystery enough, but finding complex single-celled life a billion years earlier makes it worse.  A new paper evaluated claims of Cambrian-like fossils from India dated 1.6 billion years old in the evolutionary timeline.  It did not explain the Cambrian explosion, but it did require belief in a long, long fuse.

Bengtson et al evaluated rocks in India where claims of early Cambrian fossils had been reported in recent years.  They reported in PNAS this week.1  What they found was not multicellular life, but a complex assortment of real fossils indicating bacterial mats, cyanobacteria, along with segmented tubes and evidences of eukaryotic life – the more advanced form of unicellular life.  The fact that some of these eukaryotes formed tube-like shapes raises the question: why would a billion years go by with no more complex assemblages?  There were also “embryo-like globules” indistinguishable from those found in early Cambrian deposits, though the authors assumed the resemblance was superficial.

Prior reports of complex fossils so early in the timeline caused serious controversy.  “If these and earlier reports are correct, they have profound implications,” they said; “either the radiometric dating consistently reflects inherited dates not related to sedimentation, as suggested by Azmi and coworkers, or Cambrian-like fossils occur in rocks that are a billion years older than the Cambrian.”  They determined some imprints were due to gas bubbles in microbial mats.  Though they could not rule out a few problematic forms, they concluded that the fossils were all from prokaryotes and a few colonial eukaryotes.  Putting the happiest face possible on their findings, they said, “the Vindhyan deposits offer important new insights into the nature and diversity of life, and in particular, the early evolution of multicellular eukaryotes.”

Most important, the paper admitted that the Cambrian explosion had a long fuse.  Here’s how they put it:

In terms of the evolution of major taxa, the most significant information to come out of the Vindhyan phosphorites is the detailed 3-dimensional morphologic evidence for late Paleoproterozoic multicellular eukaryotes (filamentous algae).  Previously accepted multicellular eukaryotes were only known from the late Mesoproterozoic or early Neoproterozoic (i.e., some 400–600 million years later), although some older discoveries had at least suggested the possibility that they had a longer prehistory.

The potential of the Vindhyan phosphorites to yield fresh information on the Paleoproterozoic biotas is thus considerable, and the “shelly” biota discovered by Azmi et al. gives new insight into the nature of the Paleoproterozoic biosphere.  The discredited reports of “Cambrian” fossils [i.e., in the Vindhyan deposits dated 1.6 billion years old] turned out to be an important discovery.


1.  Bengtson, Belivanova, Rasmussen, and Whitehouse, “The controversial ‘Cambrian’ fossils of the Vindhyan are real but more than a billion years older,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, published online before print April 24, 2009, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812460106.
How credible is it to think that eukaryotes could not come up with anything more than tube-like colonies for a billion years, then bang! — trilobites, worms, crustaceans, jellyfish, and all the major animal body plans in a geological instant?  Evolution is supposed to be this inexorable force for innovation that invented mammals, birds, flying insects and all the other wonders of nature in far, far less time than that.  The real mystery here is how Darwinism survives wave after wave of falsification.  The propensity of evolutionists to snow the public with their implausible, fictional, ad hoc, speculative, imaginative, self-contradictory plot lines to rescue their theory from the evidence deserves condemnation.  Don’t let them get away with their pretensions of scholarship when defending absurdities.  The integrity of science is at stake. 


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: creation; evolution; goodgodimnutz; intelligentdesign; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2009 8:27:55 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; GourmetDan; Fichori; ...

ping!


2 posted on 04/29/2009 8:29:10 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Is this another kook thread? Seriously, they are about as bad as those hysterical pitbull threads.
3 posted on 04/29/2009 8:31:49 AM PDT by Porterville ( I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Is this another kook thread?

Why, yes. Yes, it is.

4 posted on 04/29/2009 8:35:02 AM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Bush’s fault!


5 posted on 04/29/2009 8:35:21 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli now reads "Oil the gun..eat the cannolis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

So life is a billion or more years old?


6 posted on 04/29/2009 8:37:08 AM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

20 And God said, “Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the expanse of the sky.”

21 So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which the water teems, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.

22 God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth.”

23 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fifth day.


7 posted on 04/29/2009 8:37:46 AM PDT by Red Badger (If Keynesian economics worked, Zimbabwe would be a superpower.......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Thanks for the ping!


8 posted on 04/29/2009 8:40:46 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Porterville

“kook thread”

Duh, how crediggle is it t’ dink dat eukotes cudd not come up wid anydigg more dan tube-like colonies f’ a billion years, duuhhhh, den bang! Huh huh! — trilobites, duuhhhh, worms, duuhhhh, crustaceans, duuhhhh, dgellyfish, ‘n all de madgor animal body plans in a geological instant, duh...uh...? Ebolushun is supposid to be dis inexoraggle f’ce f’ innobashun dat inbentid mammals, duuhhhh, birds, duuhhhh, flyigg insecks ‘n all de odeh wondehs of nature in far, far less time dan dat. De real myssehy hehe is duh, how Darwinism surbibes wabe affeh wabe of falsificashun. De propensity of ebolushunists t’ snow de public wid deir iplaustiggle, ficshunal, ad hoc, speculatibe, uh uh uh, imaginatibe, uh uh uh, self-contradictory plot lines t’ rescue deir deory from the, uh, ebidess desehbes conbemnashun. Duh. Don’t let dem get away wid deir pretenshuns of scholarship when defendigg absurdities. Um uh. De integrity of sciess is at stake. Lee me lone!


9 posted on 04/29/2009 8:40:56 AM PDT by tumblindice (Duhhh, uhh, um, err, uh--wash your hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
How credible is it to think that eukaryotes could not come up with anything more than tube-like colonies for a billion years, then bang!

It's credible. What enabled complex multi-cellular organisms was new genetic mechanism to script gene expression over a number of generations. Interesting websites: www.palaeos.com, www.palaeos.org.

10 posted on 04/29/2009 8:41:01 AM PDT by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tax Government

number of generations means *cell* generations.


11 posted on 04/29/2009 8:42:34 AM PDT by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
Oh, your a kook, it took me awhile to figure it out. Um, you know, the Appalachian snake handlers have websites too... you should post your “educated” non anti-evolutionary thought there... they are really “smart” like you, and they have cool snakes... that are the devil's demonic creatures... and goats, beware of goats.
12 posted on 04/29/2009 8:43:44 AM PDT by Porterville ( I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Is this another kook thread?

It wasn't until you joined the thread. ;)

13 posted on 04/29/2009 8:44:28 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Amen!


14 posted on 04/29/2009 8:44:43 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

If it exploded, how did it ever survive to propagate?

/oh, you didn’t mean it like that


15 posted on 04/29/2009 8:45:47 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Third Parties are for the weak, fearful, and ineffectual among us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse

That’s how old the Evo’s thought life would have to be in order to make darwood’s fanciful creation myth work via random mutation + natural selection. As it turns out, not even trillions of years would be enough time to account for the diversity of life, even if you grant darwood’s fairytale the miracle of the first self-replicating proto-cell.


16 posted on 04/29/2009 8:50:10 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Porterville

It wasn’t a kook thread until you showed up.


17 posted on 04/29/2009 8:50:59 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

:o)


18 posted on 04/29/2009 8:51:45 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I have no idea what you are talking about, so here is a kook with a rattlesnake on his head.

19 posted on 04/29/2009 8:52:44 AM PDT by Porterville ( I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Beware of goats.


20 posted on 04/29/2009 8:53:06 AM PDT by Porterville ( I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson