“Robert J Bauer”
?
I thought it was illegal to use campaign finances for this type of thing.
bump
I don’t understand this......Hospital workers rifled through the Octomom’s personal records. State officials dug up everything they could on Joe the Plumber. Where are these people in Hawaii or Kenya??
Alright I’ll throw down the cabbage. 10 MILLION REWARD OFFERED TO ANYBODY WHO COMES UP WITH AUTHENTIC DOCUMENTATION ON BARRY SOETORO OR BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA. Where he was born and any other paperwork that would shed light on this Usurper.....
BTTT
There is now enough to start impeachment hearings.
Not on the BC issue but on issues such as: informing the enemy of our tactics, using the federal government to quite opposition via the DHS Report.
obama foreign_donors http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_foreign_donors/2008/10/23/143619.html
Giggles is definitely not a natural-born citizen and since is supposedly a constitutional scholar. It illustrates at best, towering incompetance and at worst, outright fraud and sedition.
“the most egregious spending of campaign finances has to be the $688k in legal fees to attorney Bob Bauer for abusing the court system and threatening citizens for exercizing their Constitution rights.”
I’m sure Obama views this as one of his better investments. The birth certificate lawsuits have gone nowhere.
I will echo an earlier poster in wondering: is this a legal use of campaign contributions? First, given that Obama didn’t spend all of his often ill-gotten campaign contributions, is he really allowed to use the surplus as a big slush fund to ward off political criticism during his entire first term?
Second, aren’t the birth certificate lawsuits personal lawsuits aimed at Obama? Are campaign contributions allowed to be used to defend against such suits? As an example, if Obama got a speeding ticket, could campaign contributions be used on his legal defense or to pay his fine? Or to make a more “political” connection: if Obama ever were indicted by Fitzgerald on political corruption charges, could his campaign fund be used to defend against that? That seems bizarre.
Hot damn!!! Reference time for all the Freepers who did the “Where’s your proof!” crap at the claim of spending “hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees to fight showing his birth certificate”.
And for the other Freepers who want to say “How could Obama afford that?” Uhhh, I guess he doesn’t. Apparently campaign money is now eligible to be spent to FIGHT showing you are eligible to be POTUS.
Bob is General Counsel to Obama for America and General Counsel to the Democratic National Committee, and he has been counsel for many years to the Democratic Senatorial and Congressional Campaign Committees. He has also served as co-counsel to the New Hampshire State Senate in the trial of Chief Justice David A. Brock (2000); general counsel to the Bill Bradley for President Committee (1999-2000); and counsel to the Democratic Leader in the trial of President William Jefferson Clinton (1999). He has co-authored numerous bipartisan reports, including "Report of Counsel to the Senate Rules and Administration Committee in the Matter of the United States Senate Seat From Louisiana" in the 105th Congress of the United States (March 27, 1997); "Campaign Finance Reform," A Report to the Majority Leader and Minority Leader of the United States Senate (March 6, 1990); and "The Presidential Election Process in the Philippines" (1986), a bipartisan report prepared at the request of the Chairman and Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. Bob is also the author of the Weblog, www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com, on which he writes about campaign finance and other issues of interest to the political community.
The Mastermind behind the legal debacle?
“Obama’s Campaign paid $688,000 to attorney who threatened sanctions in eligibility lawsuit”
Obama could have saved $687,988 if he just would have spent the $12.00 for an original copy of his vault birth certificate.
I guess it doesn’t mater since the money came from campaign contributions of the faithful, spent, — supposedly — to cover up something that would be ‘embarrassing’(yeah right) to Obama.
What a great man!
STE=Q
BTTT. This is well done.
He's a constitutional lawyer & I'll bet he'd love to have a look at this!!!
Bookmark
Birther alert! This demonstrates how the Soetoro crew wants the American people to ACQUIESCE to their fraud.
There is a principle at law that ACQUIESCENCE IS ACCEPTANCE.
We can never drop this matter until it is successfully resolved. So long as we pursue justice in this matter, there can and will be a remedy...the nullification of all matters imposed under fraudulant premises.