Posted on 04/16/2009 1:39:22 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Acknowledging that an apology is owed, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano promised Thursday to meet and clear the air with veterans groups that were offended by her agencys report citing returning veterans as terrorist risks to the U.S.
To the extent veterans read it as an accusation, Napolitano told FOX News, an apology is owed.
Ill meet with the leaders of some of the veterans groups, she promised on FOX & Friends. The last thing we want to do is offend or castigate all veterans. To the contrary, lets meet and clear the air.
Napolitano said she was briefed on the report, including the warning about returning veterans, before it was released.
--snip--
I have to tell you, I was the United States Attorney for Arizona in the 90s when Tim McVeigh bombed the Murrow building in Oklahoma City and unfortunately he was a vet thats where he got his training, she said. And so when I was told about the report, it rang true with me. This has happened in the past.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com ...
You are making a VERY good point... If we are this upset over the parts that were “leaked” I can’t even IMAGINE what we’d feel like if we read the REST...
Another domestic terrorist, Ted Kaczynski (the Unabomber) was a professor at Berkeley. By her logic, shouldn’t DHS be monitoring all professors for terrorist activities. Actually, domestic terrorists usually become professors, Bill Ayers.
REMIND NAPOLITANO SHE IS DEAD WRONG!!! Richard Clarke, CLINTON’S TERROR CZAR, said in his book: “McVeigh and Nichols couldn’t get a FIRECRACKER to EXPLODE after lighting a match to its FUSE, They did NOT build the Oklahoma City Bomb which was more powerful than The Khobar Towers Bomb, ON THEIR OWN!” Thats paraphrased, correct as You may wish, but that is in Clarke’s Book.Napolitano created the most Dangerous Kidnap City in the World, Phoenix, while she was Gov. of Arizona. LOOK OUT, AMERICA!
I guess they didn't see all of us folks at the Tea Parties ROYALLY PISSED at every damn one of them.
I'd say they should be scared.
If an apology is coming, it appears too narrow in scope. The DHS should not be targeted people who disagree with the Obama administration, just because they disagree.
Nappy - what part of this don’t you get? This early in your ‘assignment’ and you screwed up big time. We will believe your apology when you resign. You are in way over your head. You make your determination because of one person?
Your report was nothing but HATE SPEECH.
Smear. It’s what they do best.
They hold complete contempt for us.
Anybody that thinks this was done in error, will stop or they didn’t understand the results or reaction raise your hand.
Thank Bush for that one... Sorry, but it’s true... It was a reactionary step taken in light of 9/11. Just like the Patriot Act that many here defended, and I got yelled at for being upset about... Guess what? THIS is why I was yelling back then folks... Trust Bush and the GOP? FINE... But NOW those laws will be used against US by the Liberals. THAT is the problem when ANY politician ignores ANY part of the Constitution for ANY reason...
Please see my post #92.
Napolitano told Steve Doocey of FOX today when he told her he didn’t appreciate being called a Terrorist because he was a Practicing Catholic and opposed Abortion, basically told him “TOUGH!” How ZERO dug her up for this critical position, defies all Intelligence, Comprehension, and Rationality! McGREEVEY’S Israeli Boyfriend would have been a better and more Logical CHOICE!
If you are a veteran who believes in the constitution you swore to uphold and defend with your life, then you are a target of this administration.
*****************
Excellent, excellent point!
No. Only left wing Obama supporting veterans were given an apology. If you are a conservative veteran, then you are still on the DHS hit list.
Another march is necessary. “ We the People, demand the firing of Janet Nappy asap.”
I spent the best years of my life defending this country and my boys are doing the same in Iraq and now the government is calling us the enemy??? My family name came here in 1674 and has served from George Washington’s army until now...
...and now I am an enemy of the state?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
What kind of madness is this???
Looks like its time to start giving copies of Unintended Consequences as birthday and Christmas gifts again!
Any law can be used against anybody by the government, and this has always been the case. The Bush laws were meant to combat genuine (Islamic) terrorism after an actual attack. They obviously worked well then but are being abused now.
The point is to keep your country from abusing those laws. We blew it.
Dammit Janet, we still hate you!
Heh heh... I honestly wish I didn’t know as much as I do about this... AFAIC, the blood of the OKC victims, and ALL the 9/11 victims, are on THIS WOMAN’S hands, as well as EVERY government agent who covered up the truth about OKC, 9/11, and OU as well! And, if there is EVER another terrorist action that connects to that SAME cell in OK — then they will bear the responsibility for any deaths as well. I hate to say it, but the GOP in charge for the last 8 years is NOT innocent either... There have been PLENTY of opportunities for our government to right the wrongs, and tell the truth... I REALLY wouldn’t want to be in their shoes when they stand before God one day... They may be able to fool PEOPLE, but they will NOT be able to fool GOD. HE can read what’s in their HEARTS and cannot be swayed by pretty words...
she said. And so when I was told about the report, it rang true with me. This has happened in the past.
Do you know what else happened in the past Janet? A little punk named Bill Ayers bombed the Pentagon...and said he wishes he did more. Do you even care about that Janet?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.