Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/16/2009 6:50:11 AM PDT by rrdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: rrdog

Yeah this turned out so well last time...


2 posted on 04/16/2009 6:51:24 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

The differences between red and blue are irreconcilable in my opinion. Secession seems inevitable.


4 posted on 04/16/2009 6:57:11 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (American Revolution II -- overdue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

The flaw in the government set up by the Founders is that there is no mechanism for expelling states that are toxic to the freedom/free enterprise system that the nation was built on. Secession of the patriot states leaves them open to attack by the stronger force of the federal military. Expulsion of those states not true to American values would be the solution to many of our problems today and would leave the true American union intact. The socialist states would wither away after expulsion, because they are parasites living off the labor of others through the public dole, enabled by politicians buying votes with the tax money of producing states. Think of what a robust nation we would be without this drag on our body politic!


5 posted on 04/16/2009 6:59:03 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog
It was inevitable that this would happen once our nation started getting more internally diverse. Liberals (and for that matter, most mainstream conservatives) have argued for fifty years that it doesn't make any difference what the demographics are in a nation. As if history provides any example of that being true. They act as if Japan could become 30% Japanese, 20% French, 20% Pakistani Muslim, 10% Jewish, and 20% Zulu and everything there would continue on as if nothing had changed.

We're then confronted with a parasite ideology, liberalism, which sponges off the constructive and productive elements of society, and uses the aforementioned internal diversity as a battering ram to get what it demands. Add in the arrival of feminism, secularism, and homosexualism, and you've got the makings of balkanization. There is no possibility of conservatism surviving in a very diverse society. It can't survive because conservatism by its very nature seeks to conserve what existed before the diversity occurred, while the diverse elements by their very nature are at war with those things. In addition, all these diverse elements feed off of the accumulated capital of conservatives, both by stealing our tax dollars and hijacking our constitutional order (as feminists and homosexuals have done). As diversity increases, conservatism must recede or depart.

9 posted on 04/16/2009 7:04:47 AM PDT by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

It will never happen. The socialists will never let the Free-Marketeers go. They need the Free-Marketeers because those are the people who generate the wealth that the socialists need so desperately. Without the Fee-Marketeers the socialist entities would collapse in complete ruin within months if not weeks.

No the socialists will use the gun barrel before they will let anyone escape their evil net.


15 posted on 04/16/2009 7:09:39 AM PDT by Seruzawa (Obamalama lied, the republic died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

The concept should be purge.

Rather than leave, the entire northeast and California should be purged from the union as a start. The euros should be kicked out of the union


16 posted on 04/16/2009 7:09:47 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . John Galt hell !...... where is Francisco dÂ’Anconia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog
Before dissolution, I would like to see states stand up to D.C., withhold taxes, ignore the 17th amendment, force a return to The Constitution of The Republic.

Lets see how Obama, Pelosi, Reid and Frank handle that.

24 posted on 04/16/2009 7:16:23 AM PDT by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog
Question:

If a person openly petitions his state government's elected officials to secede from the United States, is that person guily of sedition or worse, treason? Or is the aforementioned speech Contitutionally protected?

31 posted on 04/16/2009 7:23:40 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

33 posted on 04/16/2009 7:25:52 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog
Non starter and going no where, common sense would be a constitutional convention.
35 posted on 04/16/2009 7:30:51 AM PDT by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog
Good question.... I seriously doubt the federal government will put 5,000,000 of us Texans on trial.

I for one will support the break as much as possible. Looking at my tax dollars as an investment is yielding exponentially low return.

I say HELL YES for Texas secession.

37 posted on 04/16/2009 7:31:58 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

Rather than secede, why don’t we just kick out the blue parts?


40 posted on 04/16/2009 7:33:16 AM PDT by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

Well, let’s acknowledge that secession didn’t work 140 years ago. However, all one needs to is read the journals of the men and women of the time, Sullivan Ballou’s letter comes to mind, to understand that this generation might not be so willing to wage bloody war to force the issue.

All you have to do is read a few of these blogs and personal pages of our time side by side with these to realize the critical difference. Those who dwell in continual blubihood are more afraid of the discomfort that war brings than those of the Civil War age were of dishonor.

Definition. A blubie: Voters whose development was arrested at the mental age of 18 months.

The NappyOne


52 posted on 04/16/2009 7:43:04 AM PDT by NappyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

The trouble with his talking about secession (instead of, maybe the 10th Ammendment?) is that “secession” carries with it baggage.

What baggage you ask? That would be the baggage of the last secession which will be - mark my words - translated (using Alinsky’s Rule #12 - Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it) by those who want to “demonize’ those opposing the increased growth and intrusion of the Federal gov’t to:
“Neo-Secessionist apparently want turn back the clock 150 years in their desire to revive the Confereracy. People wonder if the governor of Texas also wants to reinstitute slavery, plantations, the fugitive slave law, and the 3/5ths compromise.”

Note for all those who will undoubtedly begin defending the Confederacy, their actions against the North, the evils of Lincoln, how schools have mistaught history, etc, etc, etc -— I am NOT saying I agree with what probably will be said, rather that it WILL be said.


57 posted on 04/16/2009 7:53:44 AM PDT by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

Rather than secession, I think we need talk of having a constitutional convention. Top issues should be reining in government spending, the Federal Reserve system, and putting some controls on the judiciary (bench term limits?) to curtail/end a judiciary that legislates from the bench.


59 posted on 04/16/2009 7:57:37 AM PDT by Miles the Slasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog
I was wondering, if a state did secede, what would happen to the state residents’ social security. What about the national debt, accumulated on behalf of all states? I wonder if we could just call it even, no more federal taxes, but we lose our SS checks. People who are retired or are nearing retirement may be reimbursed by the state by a small income tax that decreases until the only ones left have had at least 10 years with no SS deductions to build up their retirement.
64 posted on 04/16/2009 8:06:35 AM PDT by sportutegrl (If liberals could do math, they would be conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

I’m ready to move: Texas, Alaska, Montana. Fine with me!


66 posted on 04/16/2009 8:08:47 AM PDT by DTogo (Time to bring back the Sons of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

Our federal Union: it must be preserved.
- Andrew Jackson toast given at the Jefferson Birthday
celebration in 1830


125 posted on 04/17/2009 4:29:15 AM PDT by metesky (My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

Welcome to the 1850’s!


127 posted on 04/17/2009 4:45:43 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrdog

Secession is treason. Secession is the same thing as saying the Great American Experiment in Democracy is a failure. Lose an election, have a tantrum and destroy the union. Congratulations Al Queada, you’ve acquired unexpected allies.


135 posted on 04/17/2009 5:09:05 AM PDT by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson