Posted on 04/10/2009 1:21:39 AM PDT by rxsid
PRESS RELEASE FROM PHILIP J. BERG RE: HOLLISTER
For Immediate Release: - 04/09/2009
For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
philjberg@obamacrimes.com
Berg states Hollister case has been ‘Appealed’ as Opinion is so ‘outrageous’ and Sanction imposed was ‘totally unfair’ Judge showed his total bias since case was filed We will be successful on Appeal ! Spread the word !
(Lafayette Hill, PA – 04/09209) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of Constitutional "qualifications/eligibility" to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that an Appeal has been filed in the Hollister case for several reasons.
Judge James Robertson showed his bias from the time the case was filed: 1) Berg and Joyce filed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice and Judge Robertson stated he would hold in abeyance until we appeared in front of him ……….and then he would make a decision if we should be admitted…….; 2) Judge Robertson never scheduled a Hearing regarding our Motion Pro Hac Vice; 3) Judge Robertson was aware our local Washington, DC attorney, age 84, was not computer savvy; 4) Judge Robertson issued two [2] Orders, one [1] with two [2] days to respond and one [1] with one [1] day to respond, Motions that we responded to because others made us aware.
The decision by Judge Robertson in dismissing our case showed further his bias as he made statements that were totally untrue and no evidence thereof had been presented. Specifically, Judge Robertson stated how Obama’s citizenship has been “vetted, blogged, texted, twittered” during the two years of his campaign. This statement regarding Obama is so outrageous as Obama was never vetted or otherwise questioned.
Further, Judge Robertson keeps referring to Obama being “Native-born,” a new term in the efforts to justify Obama’s citizenship. The Constitution and all lawsuits attempting to discover the “truth” about Obama refer to the words in the Constitution, that being “Natural Born.”
Without testimony being presented, Judge Robertson decides our Interpleader case is “frivolous,” a decision that we completely differ with.
Judge Robertson refers to attorney Joyce and myself as “agents provocateurs.” I am honored by this designation because it shows that we are determined to expose the HOAX of Obama, the greatest HOAX upon the citizens of the United States in the history of our country, over 230 years.
The imposition of sanctions by way of a “Reprimand” to our local counsel, John D. Hemenway, Esquire was uncalled for and another attempt by Judge Robertson to stop the legitimate search for the truth about Obama’s citizenship. The following remarks by Margaret Calhoun Hemenway are right on point, “This is not a political issue – it is a legal issue and one of paramount national importance. Some question the wisdom of "undoing" an election if Obama's doubters are proven right. My father-in-law has lived through a World War, an actual impeachment and a President who was forced to resign under threat of impeachment – the nation survived, without chaos. The greatest danger to our freedom is disrespect for the Constitution and a President, who by his failure to provide evidence of his eligibility for the Presidency, evidently doesn't believe the rules should apply to him.”
Berg continued, “The Obama candidacy is the biggest "HOAX" perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years, since our nation was established. Obama must be legally removed from office. I believe that 10 to 15 million people are aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' and we must make 75 million people aware. When people are made aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' that Obama has not proven he is constitutionally 'qualified/eligible' to be President; that Obama has not produced his original (vault version) 'Birth Certificate;' that Obama has not produced legal documents to show he legally changed his name from his 'adopted' name of 'Barry Soetoro' from Indonesia; they will demand Obama be removed from his office of President of the United States."
Berg concluded, "I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in 'our' U.S.A., for 'our' forefathers and for the tens of thousands of men and women that have died and/or been maimed defending our Constitution, with our legal fight to prove that Obama is not constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President."
The following is an update on my three [3] pending cases regarding my challenge to Obama's lack of qualifications/eligibility to be President.
Also, I am preparing to file a 4th case - Quo Warranto [challenge person in office - that does not meet the qualifications].
As you know, I was the first to legally raise the issue - having filed my lawsuit on August 21, 2008, before the DNC Convention
Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340
Brief have been filed by all parties.
This is case that was dismissed in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of PA
Judge Surrick dismissed for lack of "standing" by Philip J. Berg
This is case that I bypassed Third Circuit to U.S. Supreme Court - where U.S. Supreme Court denied several Injunctions and to hear case.
However, case is still alive in Third Circuit.
Oral argument is scheduled for the end of May 2009.
Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court
Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed
Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama,
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, No. 09-5080
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-02254
This is the case of retired Air Force Colonel Hollister who is on lifetime Presidential recall.
Hollister needs to know if recalled by Soetoro/Obama - must he obey an Order by legal President or disobey the illegal Order by a constitutionally ineligible/unqualified "Usurper" President.
Case was dismissed and Sanction of “Reprimand” imposed on our local attorney.
Appeal has been filed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
For copies of all Press Releases and Court Pleadings, go to:
obamacrimes.com
Thanks.
Exactly.
That doesn't change the merits of the case, or lack thereof. And it doesn't establish standing if there was none in the first place.
There is a time limit for filing an appeal every step of the way. I haven’t really followed these case, so don’t know where Donofrio’s case is, but wherever it is, it’s on a clock.
I.e., if Donofrio’s case was denied at the District Court level, he’d have had 30 days to file at the Court of Appeals; if it was denied at the Court of Appeals, he’d have 90 days to file an appeal to SCOTUS. If an appeal isn’t filed on time, you are just outta luck.
This issue of 'nobody' has standing is a judicial fabrication. For example (post 1/20), BO signs a law that raises taxes...that 'harms' everyone who's tax burden is raised. One example, the ex CEO Wagner from GM has standing. He lost his job because of a WH policy. The handful of judges that this has gone before, have taken the easy way out by saying 'no standing' or that their court has 'no jurisdiction.'
What's the consequence for them "granting" standing (which we all have anyway)? They go down in the history books of the world as the judge/court that heard the case that brought down the usurper that the world (supposedly) loves. Perhaps even violence happens as a direct result of their 'judgement' for standing. Perhaps their life is in jeopardy. All very real possibilities. Now, what's the consequence for them to do nothing (i.e. "give" no standing)? Nothing, for them personally. Of course, our Constitution is usurped. Since they care none about the Constitution to begin with, it matter's none to them. Major difference in outcomes. It's a 'cop out' for this radioactive hot potato Constitutional crisis.
He sure does have tenacity, and thank goodness for it too. I believe, though, that he himself is a liberal Democrat.
The courts apparently don't agree with you on that one.
I believe this is simply a public statement, and not part of any documents that has been filed with the court. I'm not certain, but 1 or 2 days to respond to a court order doesn't sound "reasonable". Especially if the court hadn't granted access (prior to order) to the pacer system for their court.
Oh, it’s not ‘apparently’ it is that those few judges don’t agree period. Again, doesn’t mean they are right. IMO, it means they are scared.
So far as we know every judge who's been involved with the case has agreed that the plaintiffs lack standing. They're all cowards?
Without question, they are.
Of course they are.
This time, he'd better make sure to file in the District Court of Washington DC.
Isn't that where the Hollister case was filed, and thus the involvement of D.C. Attorney Hemenway?
But don’t miss the point: the “no standing” argument, rather than logical, is mostly arbitrary.
As illustrated in post # 25, it is an argument which itself has no standing—not by any logical principles of justice.
obumpa
Spread the word I will!!
Ley’s just say that there’s not a 1 to 1 relationship between what Phil says he’s going to do and what he actually does.
“Then everything else will implode in a circular firing squad of finger pointing.”
The very real problem is that most Americans, especially Black ones, don’t care about the constitution. Exposing him as a fraud won’t matter to them. The same way they supported O.J. Simpson in his first trial when they knew he was guilty as sin. It is all about race to them, and having a Black president and getting back at whitey. The only way they are going to be turned against Obama is for him to diss Blacks in a really bad way.
I’m sorry to say these things, but I am afraid they are so. He is this nation’s worst nightmare, and he is setting back race relations not advancing them.
Sorry if I seem off subject. I care that he might not be constitutionally qualified, but I have seen many blacks in uniform that don’t....that scares me. An upset of an Obama administration over him not be qualified will not set well with a significant minority that make up the armed forces. I don’t care about the general population, it is those bearing arms for the country that concern me. If we have a serious meltdown in the military over race, this republic is doomed.
Esquire?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.