The courts apparently don't agree with you on that one.
Oh, it’s not ‘apparently’ it is that those few judges don’t agree period. Again, doesn’t mean they are right. IMO, it means they are scared.
But don’t miss the point: the “no standing” argument, rather than logical, is mostly arbitrary.
As illustrated in post # 25, it is an argument which itself has no standing—not by any logical principles of justice.