Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

As all the manufacturers, banks, and other institutions in commerce and industry have discovered, once they accept government funds, the government "owns" them. The Internet is next. For those of us who thought it was far-fetched that the Obama administration would ever seek to control the Internet through regulation - we perhaps forgot that his socialistic, collectivist mentality seeks to subordinate everything to state control through regulation. It's already happened in China - and remember how fast Google and others folded? If he were alive today, George Orwell might retitle his book, "2009."
1 posted on 04/04/2009 3:53:56 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: T.L.Sink
Who did they make this "promise" to and why?

Photobucket

2 posted on 04/04/2009 3:57:16 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We're All Garbage Dump Bears Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink
Neutrality means letting them decide what is correct/incorrect instead of allowing the net to come under protection of the First Amendment.

Same thing they want to do with the "Fairness Doctrine"....the Orwellian name for a practice is the opposite of that.

Summarized, it's just more GOVERNMENT CONTROL.

3 posted on 04/04/2009 4:01:15 PM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink

Heard Alex Jones talk about “internet2”?


4 posted on 04/04/2009 4:02:10 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink
Even more importantly is why control the internet.

All innternet commerce is about to be taxed.

And also internet "hate speech" will become a crime.

By "hate speech" I mean speaking out factually about ethnically/sexually based politics.

Anti-tracking software will be outlawed in some states, just as radar detectors are in some.

5 posted on 04/04/2009 4:02:49 PM PDT by Candor7 (The weapons of choice against fascism are ridicule, and derision. (member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Squantos
Since you were asking... I doubt it. The dumbasses in our federal legislative bodies can't comprehend it, much less control it. Those who do understand what they want well enough to make it happen can't communicate it back to these legislators because the legislators don't understand it.

Back during the 1990s, the gov't tried to force everybody on the net to drop IPV4 and go to GOSSIP as a standard protocol. To many places owning/operating the net told them to simply pound sand.

But we'll see. :-)
6 posted on 04/04/2009 4:06:17 PM PDT by hiredhand (Understand the CRA and why we're facing economic collapse - see my about page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink

Well, it was really nice knowing all of you. (This is my farewell in advance, as FR will be outlawed)


9 posted on 04/04/2009 4:11:07 PM PDT by prismsinc (A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink

"We're MAD as HELL and we're NOT gonna take it anymore!!!"

10 posted on 04/04/2009 4:12:23 PM PDT by Colonial Warrior (Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink
waxenterror
13 posted on 04/04/2009 4:16:01 PM PDT by Nateman (Back in the USSR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink
Who's the CEO of the Internet?

Photobucket

15 posted on 04/04/2009 4:19:07 PM PDT by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink

Never in my 50 years of life has the U.S. government been so deserving of subversion. I hope the right has learned a lesson or two from the left over the years. Demonstrations and protests have never really been a conservative ‘thing’, but as the communist revolution takes hold, I hope at least some patriots are capable of causing these traitors some discomfort.


16 posted on 04/04/2009 4:19:17 PM PDT by ArchAngel1983 (Arch Angel- on guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink
Photobucket
17 posted on 04/04/2009 4:23:07 PM PDT by sionnsar (Iran Azadi | 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | "Also sprach Telethustra" - NonValueAdded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink

Here are some links to Net Neutrality, which has been argued about long before Obama. I’ve thought that the absence of “net neutrality” is what would *control* the Internet, rather than the current maintaining of it.

From Tim Berners-Lee (invented the World-wide Web in 1989)
http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/144

Daniel J. Weitzner, Principal Research Scientist
MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
The Neutral Internet: An Information Architecture for Open Societies
http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2006/06/neutralnet.html

General Wikipedia article on it...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality

A Net Neutrality FAQ
http://www.timwu.org/network_neutrality.html

A Google company statement on it...
http://www.google.com/help/netneutrality.html

Brief Wall Street Journal article on it...
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090402-713158.html

An older CNN article — Keep the Internet neutral, fair and free
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/06/09/newmark.internet/

That’s sort of a starter on it... LOL...


19 posted on 04/04/2009 4:23:44 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink; ShadowAce

“Net Neutrality” is a good thing!!

If it wasn’t for net neutrality, sites like FR(among many many others) would have never existed as we know them.

Having said that, I totally oppose the idea of Hussein and the dems doing anything regarding the internet.

The bottom line:

The Internet is just fine as it is. LEAVE IT ALONE!!!!!!


23 posted on 04/04/2009 4:34:50 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink

I doesn’t matter what some people think Net Neutrality is. Obama and his crew will define the way they want and I for one do not want Obama regulating anything.


37 posted on 04/04/2009 5:32:04 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink

How long does FR got until it’s officially non-existent?


41 posted on 04/04/2009 5:49:52 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: T.L.Sink

Bump for later read.


53 posted on 04/04/2009 7:03:43 PM PDT by khnyny ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson