Posted on 03/31/2009 4:03:36 AM PDT by AJMCQ
On March 25th, Clinton-appointed Judge James Robertson (U.S. District Court), after having threatened to impose financial sanctions on John D. Hemenway for having enjoined the Berg lawsuit to force President Obama to release his birth records to prove his citizenship, backed down. Instead of financial penalties, the Judge issued a reprimand tinged with flippancy.
Judge Robertson reconsidered his previous sanctions threat, possibly fearing monetary sanctions might spark a backlash and give a boost to the grassroots effort to force Mr. Obama to relinquish his records for public scrutiny. While the Judge gives passing tribute to Hemenway's long career of public service, "Mr. Hemenway is 82 years old and takes considerable and justified pride in his patriotic public service and his status as a Rhodes Scholar" he errs in one key respect, alleging that Hemenway is "unlikely to repeat the conduct that gave rise to this proceeding, and in his case the permissible alternative sanction of a reprimand will be sufficient." Reprimand aside, Hemenway will continue to seek the truth about Obama's birthplace and citizenship, as will other patriotic citizens who believe no President and no future Presidential candidate should be allowed to conceal documents that would prove that he or she is legally qualified to serve.
The Judge did concede that others "similarly situated" are "unlikely to be deterred, except by a penalty that would be unreasonable to impose on Mr. Hemenway alone." But curiously, the Judge previously only threatened Hemenway with financial sanctions, not Philip Berg, Hillary Clinton's ally, or the other lawyer involved in the case, Lawrence Joyce from Arizona.
(Excerpt) Read more at familysecuritymatters.org ...
Why wouldn’t the webmaster of the site be able to get in touch with them directly?
A foreign, fair weathered, nuclear armed government recognizes Obama as Kenyan born.
http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/27/what-do-you-need-to-know-to-work-for-the-pakistani-government.aspx
What do you need to know to work for the Pakistani Government?
When I click on the pdf link, it says ‘web page not found’.
Yes, the pdf was pulled down shortly after I grabbed it. That is why I made the screen shot under the link.
My recollection is that, as a result of Ken Starr's investigation into Monica Lewinsky, the subject of Clinton's perjury, Clinton WAS impeached. Unfortunately, perjury about sex was not considered an offense warranting removal from office by the United States Senate.
Does anyone have a way to get in touch with Dr. Taitz or Alan Keyes? I dont mean a webmaster of his site, but in touch with HIM?
________________________________________
Dr. Orly:
26302 La Paz ste 211
Mission Viejo Ca 92691
29839 S. Margarita Pkwy
Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688
ph. w 949-586-8110 c-949-683-5411
fax 949-586-2082
Yes, you’re right, he was impeached, he just wasn’t removed from office. What do you think would happen if you or I lied to a grand jury.
When did that happen? My memory is that the victim did not report the crime.
That was my thought also. there was evidence abounding and Starr ignored it.
By the way we saw Scooter Libby go to jail, but what have you heard of the Blagojovich story lately??
Fitz is under the direct control of the new CEO of GM. The Obamanation.
This might help. There are a lot more stories out there, a couple of minutes of Google should fill you in.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=17302
What can be said, beyond a shadow of a doubt, is that Obama's Certification of Live Birth IS A NONEXISTENT DOCUMENT, and Obama had posted in its place a totally fabricated, Photoshopped image.
“I thought Ken Starr did a lousy job.”
Maybe, but my point was the prosecutor got prosecuted and the defendant got off scott-free.
obumpa
Now this is interesting
Good grabbing job, thanks Calpernia.
I predicted this in an earlier thread because if this judge tried to impose sanctions, the attorney would have jusifiable cause to subpoena Obama’s birth certificate in order to defend himself against any sanction.
Without the BC there is no way to demonstrate that filing this case is frivolous; and this judge certainly doesn’t want it produced.
“The Judge did concede that others “similarly situated” are “unlikely to be deterred, except by a (monetary) penalty.”
So it would follow from the above statement that if one is wealthy enough to afford the ‘penalties’ involved with asserting one’s constitutional rights, one need not be ‘deterred’ from seeking redress from one’s government?
So all(pigs)have equal access to the constitution but some pigs have ‘more’ equal access than others.
Two guesses as to what sort of pig this ‘judge’ favors?
A well funded elitist pig, perhaps?
STE=Q
You are correct. I'm the expert when it comes to COLB anomalies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.