Posted on 03/30/2009 5:42:17 AM PDT by SJackson
Whats the difference between the two?
While I normally have the highest respect for David H., I think this is a dangerous "misunderestimation" of Barak Ogabe being made by a number of conservatives. There has been nothing inept or bumbling about his implementation of socialism and his dismantling of capitalism and our republic. Obomber has been quite efficient instituting his *progressive reforms* and moving us along to a one word currency and government.
What amazes me is how the masses seem to be embracing the socialism you say is being crammed down our throat. People cheer when the administration interferes in the private sector, whether in trying to control bonuses or replacing CEOs of major companies. The problem is that we have been spoon fed socialism in dribs and drabs for the past 70 years and now, when the doses are increased it doesn't seem as bad.
I really believe the free enterprise system and capitalism will never return to this country once all of the plans of this congress and administration is in place.
FOCA is a deliberate attempt to close Catholic Hospitals. The secular-progressives can’t impose socialized medicine as long as the church continues in its ministry of caring for the sick.
Horowitz needs to wake up. He’s dreaming and doesn’t realize how radical Obama really is. He’s one of those ignorant “conservatives” who ignored the warnings that should have been obvious in Obama’s past and present associations.
While overestimating your opponent may cost you somewhat, underestimating him and perhaps not even considering him an adversary is stupid and dangerous.
Only whackos consider Obama to be the anti-Christ. Scripture clearly indicates he is not.
John Bolton on Fox and Friends this morning, talking about the dangers of attacks on America, was asked by Brian if he had trouble sleeping at night. Bolton said, “I’d sleep better if we had a different administration.” I nearly choked!! He always was one to say it plain and clearly; no political correctness for him. Maybe Bolton and Horowitz need to talk, or better Bolton talk and Horowitz listen.
So can I.
I think there is a difference here in that Obama has a background of involvement in extreme left wing politics, being a disciple of Saul Alinsky, his ties to ACORN, Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, etc. I think there is cause for concern. I suppose he might moderate and mature in office, but I think Conservatives should have some healthy scepticism.
Hey, David, go read your own book on George Soros and then go choke on this article.
On a more or less unrelated note, I was listening to Rush on Friday, and he was talking about BO's bretheren. Aunt "Tootie"(?)...who is about to be deported. The half brother who lives in a hut in Africa. Some other half-brother who currently has cholera. And so on.
Sez me, "I wonder if there are any other modern-day presidents who had close relatives living in huts and dying of cholera?" It's true, that you can't choose who you're related to - I'm sure that Jimmy Carter would have loved to hide Billy in a closet, same with Bill Clinton's Bother-In-Law - but they can be given a hand up.
Surprised that BO hasn't bothered helping out his family, if for no other reason than to shut up the commentators. Says a lot about the man, I think.
Constant repetition of the BDS lies destroyed the second Bush admininstration. We should destroy the Usurper by constant repetition of the truth, something Horowitz seems to have trouble grasping here.
Was this written before or after the author discoverd BO was assuming the power to hire and fire private sector CEOs?
Obama’s level of spending/socialism IS way beyond the pale of anyone in history.
Yes, conservatives can take things too far sometimes. Calling for unprovoked violence against the government is one way. But calling BO and his lapdogs (like the press) out on their hypocrisy isn’t.
Obama is doing WORSE than Bush ever thought of doing AND he was front and center ripping Bush for his actions.
I may not have always agreed with Bush - though mostly I did - but he was a principled man, told the truth, spoke his mind, and stuck to his guns. He never let polls dictate policy.
For those reasons, BDSers were sick, twisted, leftist nuts who spewed venom for venom’s sake. None of their complaints and accusations were rooted in any reality.
Obama, on the other hand, is a danger, a liar, a poseur, and an inexperienced, unqualified snake oil salesman who has taken over the government of the wealthiest and most powerful nation in the world.
He and his Congress, have already shredded the constitution - a charge that was laughably and incorrectly made against Bush. So this is not derangement - this is being properly outraged and horrified at the actions of an anti-American who has the power to remake this country in his own, Marxist, collectivist, redistributionist image.
David, my friend, in this Easter season, you have no idea what Christ means, so how can you rule on an "anti-Christ?"
Zero hates America.
That was how he was raised, who mentored him, who sponsored him, who hired him, who churched him and who married him.
His hope and change is really retribution on America for us being successful and free.
So, no, David, I’m not being paranoid.
And his constant use of a teleprompter is far more sinister to me than just being a narcissist.
We’re into Jedi mind control, and along with a cheerleading media, and we are in deep kimchee.
**** you horowitz!
LLS
I agree... like I said before... **** horowitz!
LLS
I call it the Obama Reality Syndrome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.