“God save us all. “
You can say that again, and again and again.
We all need to pray. I am so scared for this country; I am so scared for all us. I am so scared for my kids and the mess that’ll be handed to them; and, if this downslide continues the country they’ll be living in.
I want my country back!
Idiot is Homeland Security boss and does not even realize that the TERRORISTS have declared WAR on the United States and all of its people.
Well dammit Janet, that means your boss is really just an undocumented, Constitutionally-impaired, unofficially employed immigrant that just happens to be occupying the highest Office in the Land.
So just ignore my tagline.
Read the FOX piece slowly and let this “nuance” sink in. And then realize that the Secretary of Homeland Security said this. The one person who is supposed to be protecting us. Good night and sleep tight, America. Barack and Janet are watching over us.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm
Interesting theory....
At which your boss is a master, lady, and seems to want to continue...
Fixed it.
The word “terrorist” is no longer to be used.
The new title is “man-caused-disaster-causing men”.
Are there no woman terrorist! I call sexism!!!! I’m terribly offended!
LOL, If you ever looked at the hags at Code Pink you know there is such thing as Woman-Caused Disaster.....
I REFUSE to adopt their traitorous language.
I will continue to call a spade a spade, and a terrorist a terrorist (and a Kenyan a Kenyan, a Marxist a Marxist, an illegal immigrant an ILLEGAL immigrant, and a usurper a usurper).
How did this bozo ever get elected governor?
Zero is a stupid man caused disaster.
Hey Janet, illegal immigration is a man-caused disaster, so deal with it already!
“I referred to “man-caused” disasters”
I find that term sexist.
Why not call it “Fluffy Marshmallows” instead?
1- the term is very Orwellian in nature and denies the essence of a terrorist's motive; to inflict terror, as he cannot muster enough physical strength to actually conquer his opponent. In this view it seems like just another PC (pick up the poop by the clean end) term to help us all embrace our diiiveeeersssity and excuse the hate of our enemies, while painting us all as the true haters. This thinking makes my head hurt.
2- the term may be an attempt to pre-label other activities, such as the coming protests against our government's actions, taxation, wealth confiscation and redistribution. Should a group ever try to rise up in force against our government, the fedgov will be unable to call these self-proclaimed patriots “terrorists”, lest they only fuel the protests or uprising with even more popular support. So, by creating this pre-label, the patriots can be called, not an evil name, rather, mere “instigators of man-caused disasters”. Then the full force needed to crush dissent would be excused as preventing such a “disaster”. And the leftists would cheer the oppression.
When “global warming” was shown to be a farce by so many scientists that critical mass was achieved in finally putting the matter to a shameful end, the leftists changed the terms to “climate change”- what, for centuries has been commonly known as “weather” now became an evil man-caused disaster. So it is now. I believe it is a preemptive attempt to re-label the actions of patriots and subtly equate them to the level of terrorists. When the redefinitions are complete, those who would oppress us will use this new term to rationalize all sorts of evil.
Never allow your enemy to define the terms, or you will always lose the debate. Cases in point...abortion is now "choice"...homosexuality is now "gay", "a lifestyle choice"...using elephant poop to paint a picture of the virgin Mary, or a crucifix in an urn of urin is called "an expression of art"...and so forth.
This redefinition of a terrorist is a foreshadow of evil thigns to come.
...IMHO
Someone please explain to me how that not mentioning terrorism is “it demonstrating that we want to move away from the politics of fear toward a policy of being prepared for all risks that can occur.”
Cause I’m missing something ,I don’t get it at all.
There is no greater evidence of a “man-caused disaster” than the Obama Administration.
Napolitano tells the German news site Spiegel Online that while she presumes there is always a threat from terrorism: "I referred to "man-caused" disasters. That is perhaps only a nuance, but it demonstrates that we want to move away from the politics of fear toward a policy of being prepared for all risks that can occur.""Man-caused"? That's sexist. "Human-caused" is the correct term. Used in a sentence, "the 2008 election of Obama to the presidency was a human-caused disaster."