Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Geithner: Spending hikes are short-term; will end
AP on Yahoo ^ | 3/12/09 | Jim Kuhnhenn - ap

Posted on 03/12/2009 9:21:46 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama's ambitious new budget faced bipartisan skepticism Thursday as key senators questioned the administration's long-term budget outlook and the deficits it envisions rising in the middle of the next decade.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner defended it in testimony before the Senate Budget Committee, saying current increases in spending are short term and will have to be substantially reduced to get the country back into fiscal shape.

Still, the Democratic chairman of the Budget Committee, Kent Conrad of North Dakota, called the track of future deficits "unsustainable" and singled out Obama's proposal for spending $634 billion on health care over the next 10 years.

"Some of us have a real pause about the notion of putting substantially more money into the health care system when we've already got a bloated system," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: geithner; hikes; shortterm; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2009 9:21:46 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Some of us have a real pause about the notion

But not nearly 'enough of us'...

2 posted on 03/12/2009 9:23:11 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (Here's hoping the Kennedy family trust is in deep....with Madoff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“Spending hikes are short-term; will end”

The spending hikes will end after we are all broke.


3 posted on 03/12/2009 9:23:49 AM PDT by caver (Obama's first goals: allow more killing of innocents and allow the killers of innocents to go free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Uh huh


4 posted on 03/12/2009 9:24:15 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush - and zer0 has already failed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caver
The spending hikes will end after we are all broke.

...or the Lord Obama is impeached and removed from office.

5 posted on 03/12/2009 9:24:20 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

“we’ve already got a bloated system”

...not nearly bloated enough apparently!


6 posted on 03/12/2009 9:24:20 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner listens to questions as he testifies before the Senate Budget Committee on "The President's FY2010 Budget and Revenue Proposals" on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 12, 2009. REUTERS/Jim Young


7 posted on 03/12/2009 9:24:40 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

When the tax revenue dries up.


8 posted on 03/12/2009 9:24:46 AM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

does anyone believe that Obama plans to decrease his spending while in office? $4 trillion budget for next year and a lot of that is deficit, anyone think his budget after that will be less?


9 posted on 03/12/2009 9:25:37 AM PDT by GeronL (Will bankrupting America lead to socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
States: “Accept this money or else!” Says Geitner

Of course, if States accept the money, they will have to fund the “out years” by themselves!

10 posted on 03/12/2009 9:26:07 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

March 12, 2009

CHICAGO

BY MICHAEL SNEED Sun-Times Columnist

It’s scary!

Sneed is told the daily average of mortgage foreclosure filings in Cook County has surged 72 percent since President Obama took office!

• • To wit: “If present trends continue, Cook County is projected to be hit by more than 50,000 new mortgage foreclosure cases by year’s end,” Circuit Court Clerk Dorothy Brown tells Sneed.

• • The kicker: “Prior to President Obama’s inauguration, the daily foreclosure filings were 161 cases per day. Now, it’s up to 277 cases per day,” Brown said.

• • The shocker: Brown fears the foreclosure spike, which has also risen since announcement of Obama’s anti-foreclosure plan, may be causing some “banks benefitting from bailout funds to rush troubled homeowners into foreclosure — rather than helping them restructure home loans.”

• • Protect ‘em: “We are the second largest county in the United States,” Brown said. “Our government needs to be aware of what is occurring with mortgage foreclosures here on ‘Main Street.’ Banks have to be held accountable for the money received from the bailout and fulfill their role in helping to protect struggling homeowners.”

• • Hold ‘em: Watch for Brown to hold a news conference at 11 a.m. today at the Daley Center to discuss the shocking statistics and suspect banking practices.


11 posted on 03/12/2009 9:26:34 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Indeed, I suppose they will end—when we are totally bankrupted and the whole world knows we are totally bankrupted, then, I imagine, the spending hikes will end.

Is this Geithner fellow brilliant or what?


12 posted on 03/12/2009 9:27:20 AM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Shite’de la bull.


13 posted on 03/12/2009 9:29:09 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Is this a joke?


14 posted on 03/12/2009 9:31:04 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner defended it in testimony before the Senate Budget Committee, saying current increases in spending are short term and will have to be substantially reduced to get the country back into fiscal shape."

Dear Little Timmy Turbo,

Entitlement programs grow and balloon in size and costs. They do not "reduce" themselves.

15 posted on 03/12/2009 9:37:33 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
“Spending hikes are short-term; will end”

In other news, swamp land and bridge sales are up in 2009.

16 posted on 03/12/2009 9:38:30 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski (No good deed goes unpunished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"...saying current increases in spending are short term and will have to be substantially reduced to get the country back into fiscal shape."

REDUCTION WILL NEVER HAPPEN!!

17 posted on 03/12/2009 9:38:50 AM PDT by Roccus (The Capitol, the White House, the Court house.....................America's Axis of Evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner defended it in testimony before the Senate Budget Committee, saying current increases in spending are short term and will have to be substantially reduced to get the country back into fiscal shape.

Democrats, or Republicans, as far as I know, have NEVER reduced any spending they put into place.

18 posted on 03/12/2009 9:38:55 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Every time Geithner speaks I have an urge to bust my TV. He reminds me of the arrogant punk down the street who’s dad bought him a Corvette and he flaunts it like he’s god. I think I’m getting sick just thinking about this guy.


19 posted on 03/12/2009 9:42:44 AM PDT by jakota (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Cities’ Plans to Swap Cash for Stimulus Are Stopped
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2205147/posts

Suppose the federal government gave you and your neighbor $500 each to buy a new bike, but what you really wanted was a $250 shopping spree for running gear instead. So you offered to sell your $500 federal check to your neighbor for $250 in cash so everyone’s dreams could be realized.

That is essentially what several cities in Los Angeles County planned to do with federal stimulus money, until the local transportation authority, its face slightly reddened, pulled the plug on the plans. A spokeswoman in Washington for the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure said Wednesday that the swaps would be illegal.


20 posted on 03/12/2009 9:43:42 AM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Be prepared for tough times. FReepmail me to learn about our survival thread!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson