Posted on 03/11/2009 5:10:54 PM PDT by KTM rider
A lawyer lobbying the U.S. Justice Department and the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of Barack Obama's qualifications to be president says a key conservative justice has hinted that another conservative justice has been voting against hearing the dispute.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
You said — “Don’t tell me you’re gonna start stalking me now.”
Ummm... “stalking”... I think you invented it...
Doesn’t it really get to you that your ideology can’t stand on its own merits, and that your only option is to pretend you’re not a leftist?
You said — “Doesn’t it really get to you that your ideology can’t stand on its own merits, and that your only option is to pretend you’re not a leftist?”
Not as long as I know I’m not... :-)
Karl Marx was not only wrong factually, he was wrong morally.
Saul Alinsky followed Marx, and lost.
Obama is following Alinsky, and he’s losing. Fast.
You said — “Obama is following Alinsky, and he’s losing. Fast.”
I didn’t vote for him, and I won’t be voting for him in the next election either. But, what I will do is see that this Oklahoma law gets passed so that he produces his documentation — as required by law, in the State of Oklahoma.
Now, that’s a lot better than the results I see from the Obama Derangement Syndrome people...
Not only was Marx morally wrong, he was a fool.
As Obama is a fool.
You said — “As Obama is a fool.”
—
Well, at least we can agree there.
It’s just too bad you can find sane ways to deal with Obama... :-)
I thought you weren’t authorized to define sanity.
You’re going outside your area of expertise—remember what Alinsky told you people.
You said — “You’re going outside your area of expertise—remember what Alinsky told you people.”
Now..., now..., you’re getting your orders mixed up with your other papers... :-)
You’re thinking to yourself, “If people read this thread they might realize I’m a leftist.”
So you have to repeat over and over “I didn’t vote for Obama, I swear I didn’t.”
And then you have to claim you’re “working on a case” to provide further cover.
But most of all, you just gave yourself away yet again: if you were really a conservative who happened to be at odds with the birth certificate issue, you wouldn’t think I was a leftist troll. That one made no sense.
You said — “That one made no sense.”
And likewise, it makes no sense that I am either... so I guess we’re both in the same boat...
But, one more thing... :-)
You were saying — “And then you have to claim you’re “working on a case” to provide further cover.”
—
Now, the funny thing about this one — is — that you’re the one who asked the question about what I was doing.
So, it appears that the logic goes this way... You ask the question. If I’m doing nothing, then obviously I’m a leftist. On the other hand, if I’m doing something, then obviously I’m providing cover...
I have noticed that kind of mentality with the Obama Derangement Syndrome people..., yes, indeed...
And another one... :-)
You were saying — So you have to repeat over and over “I didn’t vote for Obama, I swear I didn’t.”
—
Now here is where the “logic” of the Obama Derangement Syndrome people comes out even more....
When someone posts something that these “ODS” people don’t like to hear (something that actually makes some sense, doncha know...), then the next thing that gets mentioned by them is — you voted for Obama...
So, if you say nothing, then their logic is, “See, I was right...” If you say to the contrary, then the logic is “So, you’re trying to cover your tracks!”.
Thus, by this continuing circular and forever spinning logic, you only have to say something that the ODS people don’t like and then you’re either not denying it — or — you’re covering your tracks...
Are you sure your head isn’t spinning off your body by now?
:-)
She tries to assert that those of us who think there is some doubt to 0bama’s actual eligibility are suffering from extreme bias against him, thus clouding our rational mental functining.
It’s actually the reverse. Her slavish devotion to 0bama and leftism is rendering her so irrational that compared to her, mad dogs look like scholars.
You said — “She tries to assert that those of us who think there is some doubt to 0bama’s actual eligibility are suffering from extreme bias against him, thus clouding our rational mental functining.”
—
Ummm..., let’s try the ideas that Obama is going to be escorted out of the White House, by a U.S. Marshal carrying a judge’s court orders to do so, and in handcuffs, as he walks away from the White House... LOL...
Better yet, when things “really get going” in the conversation, and people start complaining about how the whole country is in cahoots with Obama, and how corrupt the court system is, along with Congress and no one is going to do anything — then someone comes up with the idea that the U.S. Military will finally take over, realizing that Obama really is not the President and surround the White House with tanks and demand that he leave... :-)
Now, there’s a good definition of Obama Derangement Syndrome... for sure...
—
In addition, if someone was to mention that that states should enact legislation (which three of them are — Arizona, Oklahoma, and Missouri) to require specific documentation or a candidate cannot be placed on the ballot, then that person saying that — must be an Obot... LOL...
Well, I am working with the Oklahoma legislature on precisely that legislation. We’ll have it in place before Obama goes through another election...
Time to “get sane” I would say...
She's afflicted with Obama Sycophant Syndrome.
You said — “She’s afflicted with Obama Sycophant Syndrome.”
—
The conservative media and blogs didn’t put out the term “Obama Derangement Syndrome” for me... LOL...
Good point. If only she were elevated to the level of a mad dog, we could expect from her thinking a more logical progression conducive to organized debate.
Sure, but the effort you’re putting into this Oklahoma law thing—essentially typing comments about it on FreeRepublic—is approximately one thousandth the magnitude of the effort you put into defending Obama on this thread.
This tells us you care about defending Obama at least a thousand times more than you care about typing a comment on the “Oklahoma law” situation (which won’t actually get anything done in the Oklahoma legislature anyway).
“Are you sure your head isn’t spinning off your body by now?”
Your question demonstrates an unconscious (presumably) desire to behead your opponents on FreeRepublic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.