She tries to assert that those of us who think there is some doubt to 0bama’s actual eligibility are suffering from extreme bias against him, thus clouding our rational mental functining.
It’s actually the reverse. Her slavish devotion to 0bama and leftism is rendering her so irrational that compared to her, mad dogs look like scholars.
You said — “She tries to assert that those of us who think there is some doubt to 0bama’s actual eligibility are suffering from extreme bias against him, thus clouding our rational mental functining.”
—
Ummm..., let’s try the ideas that Obama is going to be escorted out of the White House, by a U.S. Marshal carrying a judge’s court orders to do so, and in handcuffs, as he walks away from the White House... LOL...
Better yet, when things “really get going” in the conversation, and people start complaining about how the whole country is in cahoots with Obama, and how corrupt the court system is, along with Congress and no one is going to do anything — then someone comes up with the idea that the U.S. Military will finally take over, realizing that Obama really is not the President and surround the White House with tanks and demand that he leave... :-)
Now, there’s a good definition of Obama Derangement Syndrome... for sure...
—
In addition, if someone was to mention that that states should enact legislation (which three of them are — Arizona, Oklahoma, and Missouri) to require specific documentation or a candidate cannot be placed on the ballot, then that person saying that — must be an Obot... LOL...
Well, I am working with the Oklahoma legislature on precisely that legislation. We’ll have it in place before Obama goes through another election...
Time to “get sane” I would say...
Good point. If only she were elevated to the level of a mad dog, we could expect from her thinking a more logical progression conducive to organized debate.