Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

150 Years Later, Fossils Still Don't Help Darwin
ICR ^ | March 4, 2009 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

Posted on 03/04/2009 7:16:11 PM PST by GodGunsGuts

150 Years Later, Fossils Still Don't Help Darwin

by Brian Thomas, M.S.*

“Creationists claim there are no transitional fossils, aka missing links. Biologists and paleontologists, among others, know this claim is false,” according to a recent LiveScience article that then describes what it claims are 12 specific transitional form fossils.1 But do these examples really confirm Darwinism?

Charles Darwin raised a lack of transitional fossils as a possible objection to his own theory: “Why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms?”2 Later in this chapter of his landmark book, he expressed hope that future discoveries would be made of transitional forms, or of creatures that showed some transitional structure—perhaps a half-scale/half-feather.

Although some creationists do say that “there are no transitional fossils,” it would be more accurate to state that there are no undisputed transitional forms. Although the article asserts that the fossil record “is full of them,” the reality is that it does not contain a single universally accepted transitional form. Every transitional fossil candidate has both proponents and doubters even among evolutionary “biologists and paleontologists.”

The first supposed transitional form offered in the report is Sahelanthropus. This 2001 discovery was first hailed as a transitional form in the ape-to-human line, but controversy over its transitional status immediately ensued. Brigitte Senut of the Natural History Museum in Paris was skeptical, saying that its skull features, “especially the [canine teeth],”3 were characteristic of female gorillas, not human-like gorillas. Senut and her colleagues also disputed that Sahelanthropus was even in the ancestry of humans at all: “To represent a valid clade, hominids must share unique defining features, and Sahelanthropus does not appear to have been an obligate biped [creature that walked on two feet].”4 In other words, Sahelanthropus is at best a highly disputed fossil of an extinct ape, having no clear transitional features.

LiveScience also listed a medium-neck-length fossil giraffe named Bohlinia and the “walking manatee” as transitional forms. However, Bohlinia is just variation within what is still clearly the giraffe kind and doesn’t answer the question, “Where did the giraffe kind come from?” Such variations within kinds do not refute the creation concept, but rather are predicted by it.5 And the “walking manatee” walked because it had fully formed, ready-to-walk legs, hips, nerves, and musculature. The article does not mention that this particular fossil is shown elsewhere to be a dead-end species, “transitioning” to nothing, according to evolutionists.6

The LiveScience article, borrowing from geologist Donald Prothero, also claimed that Moeritherium is “the ultimate transitional fossil,” the ancestor of elephants. This was an amphibious mammal, shaped like a hippo, with a mobile, muscular lip fused with its nostril. But it had none of the real characteristics of an elephant—not the trunk, size, tusks, nor the specialized weight-bearing knee joint structure.7

The “classic fossil of Archaeopteryx” is not a transitional form either, but was fully bird. Its “reptile-like” teeth and wing claws are found in some birds today.8 Many reptiles have no teeth, but nobody claims that they evolved from birds. And the discovery of a “frog-amander” has yet to be agreed upon as transitional by evolutionists. John Bolt, a curator at the Field Museum in Chicago, told National Geographic that “it is difficult to say for sure whether this creature was itself a common ancestor of the two modern groups, given that there is only one known specimen of Gerobatrachus, and an incomplete one at that.”9

Other extinct creatures had “shared features,” physical structures that are found in different kinds of living organisms. However, “shared features” are not transitional features, which is what Darwin needed. There is no scientific evidence to refute the idea that shared features were designed into creatures by a Creator who wisely formed them with the equipment to live in various shared habitats.

Fossils do reveal some truth about Darwin’s theory—they reveal that the same inconsistencies he noted between his theory and the fossil data persist, even after 150 years of frantic searches for elusive transitions.10 Not only is there no single, undisputed transition, but real fossils reveal that animals were fully formed from the beginning.

References

  1. Lloyd, R. Fossils Reveal Truth About Darwin's Theory. LiveScience. Posted on Livescience.com February 11, 2009, accessed February 18, 2009.
  2. Darwin, C. 1902. On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 6th Edition. New York: P. F. Collier & Son. 233.
  3. Chalmers, J. Seven million-year-old skull 'just a female gorilla.' The Sun-Herald. Posted on smh.com.au July 14, 2002, accessed February 18, 2009.
  4. Wolpoff, M. H. et al. 2002. Palaeoanthropology (communication arising): Sahelanthropus or 'Sahelpithecus'? Nature. 419 (6907): 581-582.
  5. Gish, D. 1981. Summary of Scientific Evidence for Creation. Acts & Facts. 10 (5).
  6. Rose, K. D. and J. D. Archibald. 2005. The Rise of Placental Mammals: Origins and Relationships of the Major Extant Clades. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 87.
  7. Weissengruber, G. E. et al. 2006. The elephant knee joint: morphological and biomechanical considerations. Journal of Anatomy. 208 (1): 59-72.
  8. Denton, M. 1986. Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. Bethesda, MD: Adler and Adler, 175, 176.
  9. Casselman, A. "Frog-amander" Fossil May Be Amphibian Missing Link. National Geographic News. Posted on news.nationalgeographic.com on May 21, 2008, accessed February 18. 2009.
  10. Gish, D. 1995. Evolution: The Fossils Still Say No! El Cajon, CA: Institute for Creation Research.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 150years; archaeopteryx; bohlinia; creation; darwin; evolution; fossilrecord; fossils; gerobatrachus; goodgodimnutz; intelligentdesign; nationalgeographic; of; origin; sahelanthropus; species; transitional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 461-472 next last
To: tacticalogic

Oversimplification is a common propaganda technique.

LOL!!!!!

What, while ignoring your own endless projections, strawmen, intellectual dishonesty, etc., ad infinatum?

LOL!!!!!

Evolution is too complex for the unwashed masses to understand... typical liberal drivel.

*YAWN*


161 posted on 03/05/2009 1:32:50 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: chesley
Not taking sides either way here.

Good luck with that. "Polarization" is a common tactic on these threads, and there's no room for the uncommitted in those arguments.

162 posted on 03/05/2009 1:34:47 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

See 138.


163 posted on 03/05/2009 1:39:16 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: atlaw

Of course, and I also understand that when they read scripture and come to such conclusions as in order to be a Christian they follow the 10 commandments or “follow Christ” or be really nice to kittens, then they have comprehension problems.

And when they scream ‘GD America’ and then they say “that’s in the Bible”, or exclaim Jesus was a ‘communtiy organizer’, THEN I understand they’re not even bothering to employ such a method, read scripture, understand what they read if they bother reading at all; and their enemy has all but won.


164 posted on 03/05/2009 1:42:31 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: atlaw; GLDNGUN

Yeah. I’m with you. Why bother with that reading and learing stuff when there’s tv to watch.

Is this anything like the 60+ million examples of “Christianity” and “lawsuits” that you ignored the other day?


165 posted on 03/05/2009 1:44:29 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: atlaw

Like I say, I’m with you. If we don’t know everything, we don’t know anything.


Not so much the point as your ilk demanding to keep students from learning alternatives.

But then, we all knew that.


166 posted on 03/05/2009 1:46:11 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
That's why I generally keep my mouth shut. Not that I don't have an opinion about it. I do. I just have other opinions that I would prefer to put my efforts into defending just now.

I can argue either side, but I just prefer to watch the sparks, and maybe occasionally play Devil's Advocate.

167 posted on 03/05/2009 1:48:59 PM PST by chesley (A pox on both their houses. I've voted for my last RINO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

All I care about is the science. Let’s go with the “theory of evolution” (since the “cult of evolution” sounds ominous and I don’t really know what you mean by it).


168 posted on 03/05/2009 1:50:56 PM PST by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Greene
I do know that in the Baptist, Church of God, Assembly of God and most Methodist churches, the Word of God is taken literally except for the obvious parables.

Orthodox or Reform Assembly of God?

169 posted on 03/05/2009 2:07:33 PM PST by Oztrich Boy ( As for a future life, every man must judge for himself between conflicting vague probabilities. - D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke

Evo-cult victims...????

It’s not that hard really...you’re the victim of a cult.

You’ve been programmed. It’s not that hard to see. Take for instance these threads here on FR alone, there’s simply no criticism or dissent of evolution that’s not attacked as an assualt on science or religion assaulting science, etc. etc. etc.

If creationism is taught or even mentioned, we’ll somehow morph into a theocracy, experience an inquistion and scientists will be burned at the stake. Nevermind none of this occured before the godless liberal NEA hijacked our public schools.

If that’s not a God hang-up, I don’t know what one is, I guess.

Uhhh don’t look now confucius but the creatues were a strawman contsruct of one of your fellow liberals!
LOL!

As far as scientific proof of God, do you have any scientific proof that you love your beautiful son?

For that matter, I’d like to see the scientific evidence and proof behind string and membrane theory, not to mention multiverse theory and then there’s the science of studying the effectiveness of prayer, miracles, etc.

Lastly, I’d point out that “proof or evidence of God” isn’t something remotely to be gained by man’s designs or demands through his narrow understanding or tools, but if you genuinely ask God to reveal himself and come into your heart, you’ll get all the proof you’ll ever need, unquestionably, and I’d imagine similarly to the issue of love for your son, it’s not arguable if it’s the kind of love we’re talking about the same love I have for my son.

A parameter I guess would be something along the lines of sacrifice for something greater than yourself, giving your life for a complete stranger for instance. It’s not “natural” to walk into a fire to extract a victim for instance, (and of course not all people do).

But again, I don’t know that there is proof as we understand it per se, but then we don’t have “proof” that all animals came from a common ancestor, but we have alot of conjecture CALLED proof.


170 posted on 03/05/2009 2:26:40 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

secular humanity?

liberalism is a disease.


171 posted on 03/05/2009 2:40:07 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke; tpanther; atlaw; Alamo-Girl
Ignoring your mocking insult ("evo-cultist victims," whatever that means) here's my answer: God says "Hey, how ya doin" to me. Short of that, I'd ask for two things: Evidence, yes evidence, of the Deity. Anything will do. Evolution has hundreds of thousands of pieces of evidence, I'm asking for ONE.

I apologize for those Christians who believe that insulting non-believers is a good way to bring them to know Christ.

I wish we could meet face-to-face so that I could show you these things, but the strongest evidence for God is how he changes lives for those who will let him. Read about William Wiberforce and see the movie Amazing Grace. God used Wilberforce to end slavery in a large portion of the world. Look at Mother Theresa and the changes she brought to the streets of Calcutta. Look at modern missionaries who serve lepers. Google for past missionaries who served leper colonies, knowing that it was a death sentence.

I can tell you what God has done in my life. He has changed me from a greedy, materialistic teen-ager to a middle-aged man who realizes that the highest calling is to serve God through serving others.

I can introduce you to a very close friend who, 10 years ago, was an illegal alien, a thief, a drug smuggler, and a smuggler of other illegals. He met Jesus and Jesus changed his life.

I can introduce you to a lady who once was an abortion activist and abortion provider. She was foul-mouthed, and addicted to drugs and alcohol. Today she is a loving woman, free of alcohol and drugs, who helps pregnant mothers find alternatives to abortion. She is at peace now. She never had peace before.

I can introduce you to my father. Three years ago, he lay dying in the emergency room with a blood pressure hovering betweeen detectible and undetectible. My wife and I anointed him with oil, prayed to God, and his blood pressure rose 20 points in less than a minute. Half an hour later, everything was normal and he was sitting up and laughing with us. I have witnessed, been a part of, or been the recipient of many miracles. Yes, I know that not everyone who prays for divine intervention receives it. Sometimes God's will is to answer yes, sometimes no, and sometimes not yet.

God is an awesome God who cares for each one of us personally, down to the tiniest details of your life. If you care about something, he cares about it.Please Freepmail me if you want to talk privately.


172 posted on 03/05/2009 2:50:40 PM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

I think pretty much everbody does. It’s that same old crap over and over again. Accusations of “projection”, name calling, general insults will now ensue.


sans theocracy, inquisition, burnings at the stake, of course.

I guess you think people point out your projections and employing strawmen etc. just for fun?


173 posted on 03/05/2009 2:53:47 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
I guess you think people point out your projections and employing strawmen etc. just for fun?

I think some people entertain their egos by engaging in personal attacks and keeping "enemies lists".

174 posted on 03/05/2009 2:59:05 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
liberalism is a disease.

Engaging in personal attacks is a symptom.

175 posted on 03/05/2009 3:04:28 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: atlaw; tpanther
since the “cult of evolution” sounds ominous and I don’t really know what you mean by it

It makes some people feel good to demonize others. They can't say "I disagree with you about the Big Bang Theory." Instead, they say "Anyone who believes in the Big Bang Theory is a boot-licker at the Temple of the Cult of Darwin." You see it a lot on these threads from people who are unable to argue based on the merits of ideas, logic, or observable facts.

If you look back a couple of dozen posts, you will me described as a "Christian" and a "scientist" -- quotes included. According to those who say that, I'm not a real scientist and apparently I'm going to hell.


176 posted on 03/05/2009 3:15:26 PM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
I think some people entertain their egos by engaging in personal attacks and keeping "enemies lists".
Exactly. Apparently I'm Enemy Number One, and that gives me some satisfacition, though perhaps it shouldn't.

177 posted on 03/05/2009 3:24:16 PM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: atlaw; tpanther

You gotta love it when a wolf tries to play the victim after being caught with a sheep in its mouth. Here is a case-in-point:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2199543/posts?page=130#130


178 posted on 03/05/2009 3:30:16 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike; metmom

Wow...you got it exactly backwards.

As usual.

Focus, everytime that evolution is challenged, we hear “inquistion” and the like. If there’s demonizing going on, it’s painfully plain to see where it’s coming from, along with the lawsuits, etc.

It’s not that hard to understand, unless of course you’re willfully ignoring it or...

a victim yourself.

Don’t be a victim.

Look around you, give yourself a chance, it’s FR after all!


179 posted on 03/05/2009 3:33:13 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

==I think some people entertain their egos by engaging in personal attacks and keeping “enemies lists”.

Once a person has exposed himself as a liar, you don’t give that person credence by debating them. If you must waste your time on that person at all, you expose them each and every time the rear their ugly head.


180 posted on 03/05/2009 3:34:05 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 461-472 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson