Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cramer: Obama’s ‘Radical Agenda Greatest Wealth Destruction I’ve Seen’
FinkelBlog ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 03/03/2009 5:01:48 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

Jim Cramer is a man of the markets. But he’s also a self-confessed Democrat. So when he pulverizes the president’s plans, there’s no partisan impulse in play.

On this morning’s Today, Cramer described President Obama as having a “radical agenda” that is “the greatest wealth destruction I’ve seen by a president.”

A bit later, Cramer foresaw the possibility of a depression, and called on the president to mend his ways.

View video here.

(Excerpt) Read more at finkelblog.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackobama; bho2009; bhoeconomy; democrats; depression; economy; fundedbysoros; jimcramer; obama; obamanomics; porkulus; schifflist; sorocrats; soros
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: FBD

No doubt, and Cramer is a democrat, but Cramer is a hedge fund manager and now he’s upset because Obama actions are impacting his “free market” wealth. It’s great the dems are ALSO complaining, and having second thoughts about Zero.
I’m not promoting Cramer, just passing on some info, so don’t kill the messenger.


61 posted on 03/03/2009 9:42:19 AM PST by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

Unaffiliated voters polled over the weekend showed a 14 point drop in support for Obama from 57 to 43.

14 points in 4 days, sounds like change is in the air.


62 posted on 03/03/2009 10:04:23 AM PST by widdle_wabbit (Rush Is Right; Does understanding that make me a Conservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: FBD

Thanks for the Video link on Cramer.

UNBELIEVEABLE

I did not see it on TV, because I refuse to watch TV. It is a total waste of time. Occasionally I watch a bit of Fox News, C-SPAN, or History Channel.

NONE of the 3 blind mice or PMSNBC networks.


63 posted on 03/03/2009 10:39:55 AM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: widdle_wabbit

Buyers remorse within the first 100 days....


64 posted on 03/03/2009 11:12:20 AM PST by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: randita

Too bad we can’t return the thing no longer wanted.


65 posted on 03/03/2009 11:15:08 AM PST by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid

He would lose.


66 posted on 03/03/2009 12:10:37 PM PST by deannadurbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I believe he supported Obama, along with many others at CNBC.


67 posted on 03/03/2009 12:51:40 PM PST by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops by accusing them of war crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat
Last night on CNBC, there were several friends of the woman panelist including her that now regret voting for Obama...Ahhh buyers remorse. She said that he was supposed to govern from the middle..hahaha, so now this may help the conservative cause...

I think they need to be reminded about it for awhile, until they come up with a satisfactory answer to the question, "What the H$!! were you thinking?"

68 posted on 03/03/2009 12:54:32 PM PST by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops by accusing them of war crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
It's getting to the point that even the powerful Senator Charles Schumer is wondering why the Obama Administration didn't re-open RTC on January 20, 2009 for this very purpose...

Let's not forget that Schmuck played a leading role in the banking system fiasco.

69 posted on 03/03/2009 12:56:28 PM PST by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops by accusing them of war crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

We are all pawns in a much larger scheme....


70 posted on 03/03/2009 1:02:24 PM PST by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

This has to be the thread of the day,so far BUMP!


71 posted on 03/03/2009 1:54:40 PM PST by Pagey (B. Hussein Obama has no experience running anything, except his pedestrian mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Mr. Cramer. Thanks for you reaction. But I have to offer one small correction. Obama is not doing this blindly. His goal is to cause a depression...but not just any old depression like this country has seen several times before and survived. His goal is the Mother of all Depressions: a Global Depression. His “New Deal” is a Global New Deal, complete with a global economic ministry, a global currency, and, most importantly of all, the destruction of the US dollar and the free-market economy it represents. I'm sure he has been promised by the global powers that are pulling ALL of these strings a seat on the world governor's board when he has finished off America's sovereignty.

I agree. The White House is delighted each day the market falls. The goal of International communism is to destroy capitalism (as it didn't destroy itself per Marx). So, a down day is a happy day to them. If the economy collapses and America ends up destitute, the Leftists will be there with another social program to "help the poor" while the elite 5% will be partying at the White House and whooping it up on the people's dime. Re-read Animal Farm. Orwell explains very well how they live at the top while you are surfing dumpsters to feed your kids.

72 posted on 03/03/2009 2:28:21 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: montomike
I heard Cramer say once that he is related to Vlad Lenin. Anyone confirm???
73 posted on 03/03/2009 2:29:24 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
Wow...someone who actually considers the Electoral College. What a concept! :-) I agree with your analysis...no difference (yet?).

You mean that Electoral College that DIDN'T BOTHER to check Obama's ID?????

74 posted on 03/03/2009 2:30:55 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stayathomemom
Can you imagine the Oprah's show where she tearfully admits she supported the wrong candidate? (e.g. her book club fiascoes) I might even watch that one!

Maybe, just maybe after she gets her first Obama tax bill!

75 posted on 03/03/2009 2:33:10 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Carling
The first people to have their taxes hiked should be morons like this lady who didn't care to research the man she cast her vote for on election day. My step-father should be next in line. I told him the markets would tank, he makes his living as a money manager for the rich, and instead of using caution he is writing guest-editorials to his local paper urging people to trust in the markets. I asked him why Obama won't say this, and he said it isn't the President's role to inflate confidence. I then asked him if it was the President's job to deflate confidence in our economic system, and he had no real answer. This was 7 business days ago, and since then, the market has dropped near another 1000 points. I imagine his clients will start pulling out their money from him soon, and all because he believes in this moron sitting in the White House. It's sad.

WHO in Sam Hill would invest their money with someone who supported Obama? I would NEVER, EVER entrust my money to a liberal! Wow! These folks deserve to lose big time.

76 posted on 03/03/2009 2:35:18 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
Let's not forget that Schmuck played a leading role in the banking system fiasco.

There is a Federal statute that makes it a CRIME to say or do something that causes a panic at a Federally insured bank (which is virtually all of the banks). So, Chuckie the Gunner shoots his mouth off and starts a bank panic. I'm sure AG Holden is all over this case by now...

77 posted on 03/03/2009 2:38:15 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Ramcat

Commies aren’t pro market or pro-capitalism. Cramer isn’t a Commie. He’s a Dem.


78 posted on 03/03/2009 3:23:40 PM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

errr, uhhhh, this WAS the Today show


79 posted on 03/03/2009 3:51:54 PM PST by newbie 10-21-00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: newbie 10-21-00

What? Don’t have a clue what your point is regarding any of my posts.


80 posted on 03/03/2009 3:56:02 PM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson