Posted on 03/01/2009 10:23:02 AM PST by Reaganesque
Discharged, charging, charged: The molten active components (colored bands: blue, magnesium; green, electrolyte; yellow, antimony) of a new grid-scale storage battery are held in a container that delivers and collects electrical current (left). Here, the battery is ready to be charged, with positive magnesium and negative antimony ions dissolved in the electrolyte. As electric current flows into the cell (center), the magnesium ions in the electrolyte gain electrons and form magnesium metal, which joins the molten magnesium electrode. At the same time, the antimony ions give up electrons to form metal atoms at the opposite electrode. As metal forms, the electrolyte shrinks and the electrodes grow (right), an unusual property for batteries. During discharge, the process is reversed, and the metal atoms become ions again. Credit: Arthur Mount
|
|
You mean like a lead-acid battery? What is new about ‘liquid’?
These liquids are simply molten metal- a nice safe battery running at the melting point of magnesium.
I think a thermionic nuclear reactor may be safer.
Cheers!
In this case, the electrodes themselves are conductive liquids, such as metals or metalloids. The reactions at the electrodes are very fast.
YIKES!
Plug it in.
Don’t knock this new stuff — it has run the batmobile for years.
Most hot materials are lousy conductors. Seems like you’d lose a lot of energy due to internal resistance.
A container failure will be spectacular!
Doesn’t matter. The environuts will stop this, though they may wait until this stops what we have now. It’s the electricity and progress that they hate because it enables men to become independent from gov’t.
The Luddites will find a way to terrorize the public and demonize this technology.
I’m looking out my window at the distant towers of former nuclear power plant on the horizon that was closed in its first year of operation through a political campaign of fear and hysteria. $2 billion down the drain.
Solar panels work real good at night.
It looks as though it would only work for fixed applications. There might be some fancy ways of allowing for turbulence, but it would make everything much more expensive.
An acid battery has some solid parts. This has none. At least, that’s what I understood from the article.
And these solar farms will be located where?
And the battery farms will be located where?
The batteries will be disposed of how? Where?
Quit screwing around and go NUCLEAR!!!
Hey, I resemble that remark...I just used the term ‘Luddites’ in another thread....did you thread-jack me? Regardless, some technologies don’t go well with the general human condition. I think gas stoves, furnaces, etc. are enough of a gamble for the public homes at large. I don’t think they need to be overly complicated with obviously problemmatic devices like this.
And where will the disppose of the used materials , Yucca Flats?
Buahahahahhahahahahha!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.