Posted on 03/01/2009 9:36:10 AM PST by careyb
More sematics games from posters who don't get it.
RE :”Solid Conservative equals Obama being successful with all his taxing & programs to fast track us to socialism via the Alinsky model?..Either Obama fails or the GOP fails. “I'm not going to spend much time on you because you have the audacity to call me a liar.I watched the video and he said exactly the opposite of what you are claiming he said above.
You sir are a liar.
I didn't claim he said the "above", that is what I said and you quoted in your post to me.
Here is a quote of yours to prove what I said and prove that you are a liar
At the end he is asked if he wants Obama to fail and he said “No, of course not”Rush wants he wants Obama to fail because he wants all of Obama's socialistic programs and taxes to fail.
When Cantor says “No, of course not” to Obama failing, in the context it means just the opposite of what Rush wants.
If the Republicans can't get out in front and say they want Obama's plans to fail, then they need to step down and let some conservatives speak for the party.
Either Obama fails or the GOP fails.
Which do you want?
Get your stories straight before you jump in and call me a liar.
Most Republicans are more afraid of the MSM/DNC, than Rush.
And rightfully so, Conservatives have ZERO political power.
___________________________________________________________
Well, not quite ZERO, but I think you nailed it pretty well.
Oh cut the Stephagnopolos induced sematics bull. Cantor said that the Republicans gave Obama a plan for success and that they wanted him to succeed by using that plan.
Obama of course ignored the conservative Republican plan.
Your willingness to fall for this liberal sematics game is downright scary.
While I don’t agree with Rush 100%, and have had trouble with him when he “carried water”, he’s the only one out there really getting the conservative message across.
It’s time for Rush to step up and become more visible.
They let Sanchez steal an election from Dornan, and backed Arnold over McClintock, left Katherine Harris flapping in the wind and numerous other races they backed a liberal or RINO instead of a conservative.
I caught the bit about Stalin(ism) but, in my opinion, the name “communism” hits harder at folks.
I didn't hear about that.
Post a link to a video or transcript or article would you?
Thanks.
I dont want you picking fights between republican conservatives over nothing, by making it sound like they said something they never said('Solid Conservative equals Obama being successful with all his taxing & programs to fast track us to socialism via the Alinsky model?. '). And I am not loyal to the GOP and do not want them to win if they do the wrong things, like Bush and McCain did many of the wrong things. So pose your got-ya question to someone else.
Wrong.... I AM STILL A GOP and I WANT HIS POLICIES TO FAIL!!!!
I await your answer from the poster that berated you for speaking the truth.
Thanks for your post.
ncalburt:
The website that CareyB linked to is called “The Hope for America,” not “hope for change.” If you go there, as I did, you will see that it is an aggregate site for conservative videos. The clip is indeed from “This Week,” however, it has been posted on the “Hope for America” website. Your accusation of lying is baseless.
I do not know CareyB. I am not previously familiar with his website. However, I do believe that we must investigate our claims before we begin attacking each other. You seem to enjoy accusing other posters of being trolls, Dems, Obamabots, and such. And you haven’t been a Freeper very long.
Perhaps we should question YOU as to your purpose in constantly flinging insulting accusations about. Are you posting under a false flag in order to sow dissension? Nothing would please a Liberal more than to see us attacking each other over Rush and purity.
Good for you, I am sure there are many faithful in the GOP that do not want Present Obama to succeed.
Keep your voices out there, and maybe someday the leadership will catch on!
Not tread lightly, but just do not attack him personally.
That's what liberals do.
But Present Obama and Reid and Pelosi's policies and programs need to be attacked strongly and repeatedly every day in every possible way .
That is the only way to fight Saul Alinsky's lackeys.
My attacks on Obama would be to make him own the stock market and our 401ks. Tell people Obama’s attacks on Wall Street are driving down our 401ks , ask democrats why they are destroying our retirement, to make us all dependent on their stimulus? Also yell from the mountain tops that the Cap and Trade is a HUGE middle class tax increase. Tell the public he is lying about NOT raising our taxes.
Sorry, I am correct on all accounts .
The original post had both an incorrect Title and Source which the admin had to correct !
Why does someone intentionally do such a post ?
I never said that the posters post wasn't perfectly clear.
Question. Do both of you actually think that Cantor in his words was wishing that Obama should suceed with liberal policies?
In my view you are missing the sematics game being played here and in my view, the berating started first here on this thread of Cantor for no good reason.
I hope you don't take those remarks too as me berating you.
Cantor in the remarks that I heard was do just that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.