Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lots of pictures at the source.
1 posted on 03/01/2009 5:30:40 AM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Salman

There are billions of missing links. Darwin’s theory is just that, a theory.


2 posted on 03/01/2009 5:36:30 AM PST by scottinoc ("Katie, you're not the center of everyone's universe."-Gov Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman
I don't believe in evolution. Why are there only seven “missing links”? There should be millions of them. They have tidied up and adjusted things to fit but I do not believe.
3 posted on 03/01/2009 5:39:49 AM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman

Hey, did anybody notice the well toned arms on the Homo Ergaster chick?


4 posted on 03/01/2009 5:40:29 AM PST by Jaxter (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman
"Lots of pictures at the source."

lol!! yes, 6 DRAWINGS(*), 1 FISH.

(*) one of the DRAWINGS is an imaginative half-monkey, half-human DARK-SKINNED female/lady with saggy animal boobies.

The imagination of evolutionists never ceases to stagger me.
5 posted on 03/01/2009 5:42:06 AM PST by chuck_the_tv_out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman

8 posted on 03/01/2009 5:49:32 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . John Galt hell !...... where is Francisco dÂ’Anconia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman

The missing link is faith.


16 posted on 03/01/2009 6:03:54 AM PST by RoadTest (The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? - Jer.17:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman; metmom
Sorry, I'm going to have to call BS on this one. Everybody with anything resembling brains or talent who's ever taken any sort of a look at that situation in the last 60 years has said the same basic thing i.e. that there simply ARE NO missing links or intermediate fossils. The lack of intermediate fossils is one of the two main motivations for the new version of evolution which you read about i.e. the Gould/Eldridge/Mayr notion of punctuated equilibria, or "punk-eek". If there were missing links lying around all over the place, Gould and his pals would not have bothered.

The Fossils In General

"Despite the bright promise that paleontology provides a means of 'seeing' evolution, it has presented some nasty difficulties for evolutionists, the most notorious of which is the presence of 'gaps' in the fossil record. Evolution requires intermediate forms between species and paleontology does not provide them ..."

David B. Kitts, PhD (Zoology)
Head Curator, Dept of Geology, Stoval Museum
Evolution, vol 28, Sep 1974, p 467

"The curious thing is that there is a consistency about the fossil gaps; the fossils are missing in all the important places."

Francis Hitching
The Neck of the Giraffe or Where Darwin Went Wrong
Penguin Books, 1982, p.19

"The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution."

Stephen Jay Gould, Prof of Geology and
Paleontology, Harvard University
"Is a new general theory of evolution emerging?"
Paleobiology, vol 6, January 1980, p. 127

"...Yet Gould and the American Museum people are hard to contradict when they say there are no transitional fossils ... I will lay it on the line, there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument."

Dr. Colin Patterson, Senior Paleontologist,
British Museum of Natural History, London
As quoted by: L. D. Sunderland
Darwin's Enigma: Fossils and Other Problems
4th edition, Master Books, 1988, p. 89

"We do not have any available fossil group which can categorically be claimed to be the ancestor of any other group. We do not have in the fossil record any specific point of divergence of one life form for another, and generally each of the major life groups has retained its fundamental structural and physiological characteristics throughout its life history and has been conservative in habitat."

G. S. Carter, Professor & author
Fellow of Corpus Christi College
Cambridge, England
Structure and Habit in Vertebrate Evolution
University of Washington Press, 1967

"The history of most fossil species includes two features inconsistent with gradualism: 1. Stasis. Most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they disappear ... 2. Sudden Appearance. In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and 'fully formed'."

Stephen Jay Gould, Prof of Geology and
Paleontology, Harvard University
Natural History, 86(5):13, 1977

"But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?" (p. 206)

"Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory (of evolution)." (p. 292)

Charles Robert Darwin
The Origin of Species, 1st edition reprint
Avenel Books, 1979

The Abundance of Fossils

"Darwin... was embarrassed by the fossil record... we are now about 120-years after Darwin and the knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a quarter of a million fossil species but the situation hasn't changed much. The record of evolution is still surprisingly jerky and, ironically, ... some of the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be discarded or modified as a result of more detailed information."

David M. Raup, Curator of Geology
Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago
"Conflicts Between Darwin and Paleontology"
Field Museum of Natural History
Vol. 50, No. 1, (Jan, 1979), p. 25

"Now, after over 120 years of the most extensive and painstaking geological exploration of every continent and ocean bottom, the picture is infinitely more vivid and complete than it was in 1859. Formations have been discovered containing hundreds of billions of fossils and our museums are filled with over 100-million fossils of 250,000 different species. The availability of this profusion of hard scientific data should permit objective investigators to determine if Darwin was on the right track. What is the picture which the fossils have given us? ... The gaps between major groups of organisms have been growing even wide and more undeniable. They can no longer be ignored or rationalized away with appeals to imperfection of the fossil record."

Luther D. Sunderland (Creationist)
Darwin's Enigma: Fossils and Other Problems,
4th edition, Master Books, 1988, p. 9

"My attempts to demonstrate evolution by an experiment carried on for more than 40 years have completely failed. ... The fossil material is now so complete that it has been possible to construct new classes, and the lack of transitional series cannot be explained as being due to the scarcity of material. The deficiencies are real, they will never be filled."

Prof N. Heribert Nilsson
Lund University, Sweden
Famous botanist and evolutionist
As quoted in: The Earth Before Man, p. 51

21 posted on 03/01/2009 6:16:25 AM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman

One of the problems about the creation/evolution debate is the nature of how God creates. Creationists insist that god is confined to a time line that proceeds from a starting point in the past and moves to the future and they adopt the same time reference which evolutionists use.

Creationists ignore the possibility that God can create outside of time. They are troubled with the idea that God might have “placed fossils” in the earth at the same time he created the earth because this makes it seem God is deceitful.

I would like to suggest that two of Jesus’s miracles as well as the creation of Adam demonstrate that God can create something in the present something that required the death of something and a process that ordinarily happens over time. Jesus created wine and bread. Both originate from plants which would have taken a long time to create, bake or ferment and would have required destruction of the original. However, both happened in an instant.


23 posted on 03/01/2009 6:23:58 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman

People who believe in evolution also believe in the Tooth Fairy. All seven of those and especially the bird reptile have been shown to be frauds. But the drumbeat goes on for their attempts to disprove God.

Pray for America and Our Troops


25 posted on 03/01/2009 6:26:12 AM PST by bray (Welcome to the USSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman
Yes, pics of drawings...

These are from the talkorigins website (Left is the "turkana boy" and left is another drawing of a homo sapiens.)

Wonder why they do a comparison next to a "typical" european type skull. Compare the "turkana boy" skul to the human head shape (actual photo) in the bottom left corner.

Humans come in a wonderful variety of shapes and sizes, and the skull is no different. The consensus of what is a "typical" homo sapiens skull is often presented when comparing man's so called ancestors, however, if one does a little research into skull shapes, you will find that the shapes vary greatly! This is the best that National Geographic's scientist can come up with? I am FAR from convinced! SCIENCE!!!

26 posted on 03/01/2009 6:26:43 AM PST by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman

where’s the spam guy?


30 posted on 03/01/2009 6:31:45 AM PST by Darwin Fish (God invented evolution. Man invented religeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman
NG, no fraud is too obvious to pass up, offers up o.n.e more time eohippus as a horse ancestor and a drawing designed to emphasize horse-like features. Notice the gait taken right from a horse, hardly that of a very small animal. A galloping animal the size of house cat?

So too the jaw, whereas the skull of eohippus doesn't have the bone structure to produce such a jaw line, the modern horse does.

58 posted on 03/01/2009 7:32:40 AM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman
I needed a good laugh, thanks for the post. Check this Turkana Boy fossil out.



If that skeleton is Human Evolutionist's proof I truly feel sorry for them.
65 posted on 03/01/2009 7:59:59 AM PST by Jaime2099
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salman

Evolution is God showing us how He constructed His universe. People that oppose evolution are bound and determined to tell God how to do His job.


148 posted on 03/02/2009 8:53:54 AM PST by Brucifer (Proud member of the Double Secret Reloading Underground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson