[mountainlion]

I don't believe in evolution. Why are there only seven “missing links”? There should be millions of them. They have tidied up and adjusted things to fit but I do not believe.

[raybbr]

I don't believe in evolution.

Do you believe the Earth is only about ten thousand years old?

[chuck_the_tv_out]

""I don't believe in evolution."

Do you believe the Earth is only about ten thousand years old?"

Don't let them make it an age of the Earth argument. Look at how they always twist it that way. Manipulative evolutionists always try to twist the argument.

The issue here is utterly disproven and discredited EVOLUTION, which they have ZERO evidence for.

Nice drawings though.

[Kolb]

Did you even bother to read the first paragraph?

"National Geographic News asked leading scientists for their picks of the most important fossils that show evolution in action—seven of which are presented here"

[bert]

.......I don’t believe in evolution......

When you make that statement you clearly illustrate your total lack of comprehension. Unlike Genesis myth which must be accepted on faith alone, Science must be studied and understood. You can’t believe in evolution. You must have an understanding of the underlying science.

The problem basically boils down to ignorance. Ignorance can be solved by study of scientific works and by, most importantly, work in the lab or field.

[org.whodat]

You left out the word “major”, that means there were many more but their ranks is personal opinion.

[Polybius]

Why are there only seven “missing links”? There should be millions of them.

The article does not state that there "are" seven. The article states that scientists were asked to "pick" seven.

Of the tens of thousands of ancestors you have dating back to the time the Romans ruled Britain, can you show us where more than one hundred of them were buried?

If not, does that mean the rest of them did not exist?