Posted on 02/25/2009 4:55:05 PM PST by rxsid
New Court Order in Hollister v. Soetoro
Filed & Entered: 02/25/2009 Docket Text Order to Show Cause
http://www.scribd.com/doc/12825890/Order-to-Show-Cause
That doesn't look good on Berg (the case).
I shouldn’t say signed by the judge as I do not see his signature.
good point! maybe that negates his order argh this is really annoying..someone will SURELY get the birth certificate case resolved i believe it. I think at the very least, the military and keyes will win
I sure hope so. All Obama has to do is release his birth certificate.
When I first read that (blank pages, botanical drawings) I found it strange that a judge would write that. But not reading this kind of “stuff” every day I just shrugged my shoulders.
According to the paralegal’s declaration, a motion to be admitted pro hoc vice was already made (back in dec?).
something about the order doesnt pass the sniff test, or else it is all so rigged that they dont even care about pretending to make it sniff test passable.
i first read it a couple of hours ago, and again a few minutes ago, and it doesnt smell right now or then- not to mention I’ve NEVER seen an Order or OTSC begin by stating “Instead of”. that was a red flag from the literal first word.
this is bizarre.
I expect they should be working feverishly to put together papers to file by the deadline to create an appealable issue/record.
Please ping me if you hear of any subsequent developments.
Yes, it was done. There's an FR thread about it somewhere.
What struck me was how it doesn’t sound like a judge would write what this judge did; if he did.
I would like to see a picture of Bill Ayers next to the picture of Bauer. Every time I see Bauer, I think it is Bill Ayers. Is it me, or do you think he looks like Ayers?
What are you talking about? The clerks were ad-libing. You can’t clearly see contradictory instruction by two clerks, the respondent then clearly documenting such? The paralegal (who had to have been consulting her boss Berg) was essentially acting on dubious instruction (and so qualified as dubious with full rendering of events) of BY A COURT OFFICER in order to preserve continuity of case, should this spurious advice somehow be applicable in arcane local adherence to a year-end somethingorother.
You obviously did not follow Donofrio’s time entering his SCOTUS case as tranferred from NJ. Good grief, haven’t you ever heard or read of big-city municipal lawyers getting boxed-out by nefariously operating courts? Do a little extrapolation.
I am not a lawyer or even close but you are either young, inexperienced, or playing protocol patsy.
Tell me, where do you think the blank pages / botanical drawings came from? A mistake at THIS point by THIS plaintiff?
Perkins Coie LLP gave $100’s of thousands to 0bama and Dems. in the 2008 cycle.
Ah, to be young again. Thank you so much. Actually, I have read enough of the pleadings to recognize that this case has not been well handled.
Do you judge all with whom you disagree and assault their character and experience?
Courts require that the attorneys before them practice competently, and that is the issue in this case. The court at this point is exasperated.
Non needed. no worries :)
After the Democratic convention, Obama campaign lawyer Robert Bauer warned TV stations against airing a TV ad that was embarrassing to Barack Obama. The commercial focused on the longtime relationship between Obama and Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers. Bauer sent letters to the Justice Department imploring the agency to pursue criminal action against those behind the ads. It was not lost on anyone at that time that Bauer was considered a candidate to be the next U.S. Attorney-General.
http://spectator.org/archives/2009/02/18/obamas-enemies-list
O- nice little synopsis (sarcastic).
Obviously there is some grating going on (sarcastic).
Now that’s how you got on - leaning right in with the court as here.
Indeed you could not have followed the Donofrio transfer, to come back with such a blithe reply here.
I see another (or 2,3) has asked along same lines of you (61).
I see someone (44) who has been in that courthouse says something perhaps of bearing:
“the USDCDC is a pain in the butt to deal with, uncooperative in many regards.”
What say you to the posts 55-58, 77, 85?
Gosh, i read from a Playboy interview with Saul Alinsky posted on FR recently that he had become Frank Nitti’s favorite -like an adopted son. SA said the mob in Chicago had the courts in their pocket to the point they’d close on the day an entry was to be made against a mobster and that judges were pall-bearers for dead mobsters.
We haven’t gotten there yet but its getting on the verge of being a virtual reality, let’s say.
"... this is a reality, simulatin' another reality, after bein' co-opted by a third reality..."
Astute analysis, BonRad.
Bottom line folks is these cases need to be filed in SCOTUS upon Original Jurisdiction.
Notwithstanding Donofrio’s “wussy” post and Orly’s protestations, SCOTUS has been very considerate of these cases.
The same can not be said of the lower courts for a variety of reasons.
Again, these cases need to be filed in SCOTUS.
Despite this setback, Berg has the best shot at producing a winning case at this time.
Orly’s problems with her client Easterling have put what may be an overwhelming burden on her ability to continue prosecuting her cases.
There are a number of cases being developed that are not yet reported. So the curious cases against bo are far from over.
We have only begun this legal fight.
bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.