ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Hollister v Soetoro (re Berg)

scribd ^ | 2/25/2009 | rxsid

[rxsid]

New Court Order in Hollister v. Soetoro

Filed & Entered: 02/25/2009 Docket Text Order to Show Cause

http://www.scribd.com/doc/12825890/Order-to-Show-Cause

That doesn't look good on Berg (the case).

[Frantzie]

No. It is more like the Judiciary does not want to uphold the Constitution.

[Eagle50AE]

Thank you !

[freekitty]

I doubt if people read what Lisa filed or they wouldn’t be siding with the judge. She is documenting which is exactly what she should do what happened.

I have no idea what is going to happen; but people should really take this seriously. This is a real look into how sometimes the legal world works.

[azishot]

Why would the judge say that evidently Berg “has not been admitted to practice in this court?”

Legalese is a foreign language to me. I’m still hoping and praying that something happens real soon.

[freekitty]

I don’t know about the rest of what you asked. But it’s definately worth reading what she wrote. And I stress she is documenting what happened.

[freekitty]

I am not sure it really has to do with the Constitution; it’s more likely legal tricks.

[Frantzie]

It is pretty obvious that the Judiciary/court system/Judges are going to do nothing about the usurper. My hope is Berg can appeal this to SCOTUS. I am sure the SCOTUS clerks and Danny Bickle will try to sabotage that filing.

[luv2ndamend]

From http://www.therightsideoflife.com/

Instead of the opposition plaintiff was ordered to file by 2/13/09 (or defendants’ motion to dismiss would be granted as conceded, see [#10]), what plaintiff filed was (a) the affidavit of a paralegal (who works in the office of a Pennsylvania lawyer who has not been admitted to practice in this Court), complaining about her treatment by an employee of the Clerk’s Office, and (b) many blank pages, decorated only by what appear to be botanical drawings and the illegible photocopy of an Hawaiian certificate of live birth. (a) The affidavit was apparently intended as a response to my earlier observation that plaintiff’s motion to file interpleader was frivolous, see [#2], [#10], the argument being, “Maureen Higgins made me do it.” What was frivolous about the motion, however, was not the fact that it was filed, but the suggestion that “duties” could be filed in the registry of this court. (b) The blank pages were either somebody’s idea of a joke (in which case I don’t get it) or a mistake. If the latter, plaintiffs have until 5:00 pm EST on 2/26/09 to correct it, by re-filing their points and authorities in opposition to the pending motion to dismiss (in the .pdf format required by the Court’s CM/EDF system), or otherwise to show cause why that motion should not now be granted as conceded. It is SO ORDERED.

JAMES ROBERTSON
United States District Judge

[freekitty]

I don’t know. Maybe he is not licensed in that state. I don’t know. I would hardly think he would file something in a court in a state he is not licensed to practice in. Your guess is as good as mine.

[azishot]

This is exactly what Leo encountered in NJ courts and at SCOTUS with the clerks. Runaround, conflicting demands, nonsense

***I remember that and thought at the time that some kind of games were being played but no one knew the rules.

[esquirette]

The law is a tough business, and the courts do not accept nonsense. It is a take-no-prisoners game and the attorneys who venture into Federal court had better be willing and able to play by the rules. They are paramount, and they are all written down for everyone to see.

Too bad that the quality of legal practice leaves much to be desired here, but that is the real problem. Don’t blame it on the courts. They are charged with ruling on what is presented according to the law and the rules. They cannot and will not fashion a remedy for the plaintiff who cannot ask for the right thing in the right way.

[freekitty]

I didn’t read everything. Did the judge cite actual documentation that says the attorney can not practice law in that court or state? All Lisa did was state what actually happened. It’s like an affidavit in a way. Sometime there are blank pages but they should be numbered in bates(numbering system for documentation of legal cases) form if this is a case.

Whooee, all I can say this judge is playing hardball. Not a good thing.

[Frantzie]

Yeah we know all about the court and laws in this country where someone who by the day appears to have been born in Kenya can be POTUS and wreck the country. The Judiciary will protect him because they are as corrupt as the Dems because they are the Dems.

[Fred Nerks]

Robert Bauer, the President's personal lawyer...

BAUER BIO

Washington, D.C. PHONE: 202.434.1602 FAX: 202.434.1690

RBauer@perkinscoie.com

...Bob is General Counsel to Obama for America and General Counsel to the Democratic National Committee, and he has been counsel for many years to the Democratic Senatorial and Congressional Campaign Committees. He has also served as co-counsel to the New Hampshire State Senate in the trial of Chief Justice David A. Brock (2000); general counsel to the Bill Bradley for President Committee (1999-2000); and counsel to the Democratic Leader in the trial of President William Jefferson Clinton (1999)...

[azishot]

Thanks...glad to hear you say, “your guess is as good as mine.”

Wish I could understand why the judge would say that he couldn’t practice in this court and then turn around and say “Oh by the way, you have until the 26th to show cause.”

[freekitty]

Are you an attorney? The thing that bothers me is why would this case be filed if the attorney is not eligible to practice in that court?

Yes, law is a tough business.

[luv2ndamend]

I thought he could too. I am going to do more searching.

[freekitty]

I just don’t know.

[Freedom2specul8]

I too would like to know if a higher court would hear a case over court procedures. Fed courts are tough, but I’ve never hear of them acting like this. If there is an appeal over miscommuncation by court personnel, or whatever...I’m not sure that can be done. It is the attorney who is completely responsible for all documents filed with the court. Paralegals are supervised by attys, she was acting on attys behalf. If the atty messes up, he’s to be responsible. If the judge had committed an error, then there would be a cause for appeal of some type. Clerks are not suppose to give advice, but they can reject documents.

[MHGinTN]

This judge is a corrupt sitting judge using manufactured plausible deniability to avoid allowing anything in his court which would question his chosen president. The clerky types are being used and lovin’ it!