What are you talking about? The clerks were ad-libing. You can’t clearly see contradictory instruction by two clerks, the respondent then clearly documenting such? The paralegal (who had to have been consulting her boss Berg) was essentially acting on dubious instruction (and so qualified as dubious with full rendering of events) of BY A COURT OFFICER in order to preserve continuity of case, should this spurious advice somehow be applicable in arcane local adherence to a year-end somethingorother.
You obviously did not follow Donofrio’s time entering his SCOTUS case as tranferred from NJ. Good grief, haven’t you ever heard or read of big-city municipal lawyers getting boxed-out by nefariously operating courts? Do a little extrapolation.
I am not a lawyer or even close but you are either young, inexperienced, or playing protocol patsy.
Tell me, where do you think the blank pages / botanical drawings came from? A mistake at THIS point by THIS plaintiff?
Ah, to be young again. Thank you so much. Actually, I have read enough of the pleadings to recognize that this case has not been well handled.
Do you judge all with whom you disagree and assault their character and experience?
Courts require that the attorneys before them practice competently, and that is the issue in this case. The court at this point is exasperated.