Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DC Voting Rights Bill Clears Senate Hurdle
FoxNews ^ | 24 February 2009 | n/a

Posted on 02/24/2009 2:31:17 PM PST by batter

The District of Columbia's two-century-long wait for a voice in Congress was a step closer to ending Tuesday with a crucial Senate vote to take up legislation giving the capital city's 600,000 residents a full seat in the House.

The Senate voted 62-34, two more than needed, to begin debate on the measure that would increase the House to 437 members. It would give the Democratic-dominated city a new vote while adding a fourth seat to Republican-leaning Utah.

Key to the vote was that Democrats, who overwhelmingly support the bill, have seven more Senate seats than two years ago when the chamber fell three votes short of the 60 required to end a Republican-led filibuster.

[snip]

Past votes denying residents of the federal capital a vote in the House "left the citizens of the District with the wholly unsought-after distinction of being the only residents of a democratically ruled national capital in the world who have no say in how their nation is governed. It's really astounding," said Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., sponsor of the measure with Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: 111th; dc; dcstatehood; hatch; lieberman; unconstitutional; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Gloreee beee!
1 posted on 02/24/2009 2:31:17 PM PST by batter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: batter

D.C. is not a State! Only States may have voting Representatives in Congress.


2 posted on 02/24/2009 2:35:01 PM PST by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batter

This is similar to creating a new state where there was none before.


3 posted on 02/24/2009 2:35:05 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batter

Dont’ they read the constitution?


4 posted on 02/24/2009 2:35:47 PM PST by devistate one four (Impatiently waiting for the next tea party! Tet '68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batter

We have become a one-party country.

Sort of “Chicago, with a Zimbabwe twist”.


5 posted on 02/24/2009 2:36:49 PM PST by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batter

Good job there, Hatch. Screw the Constitution for a seat for your state. Guess how long it’ll take for a cabal of liberals to move into that district?

This is pathetic, folks.

Our only hope is that there are judges who still know how to read the Constitution.


6 posted on 02/24/2009 2:37:59 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batter

I hope someone is planning a challenge on constitutional grounds.


7 posted on 02/24/2009 2:38:13 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batter
Here are some of the Senate Republican cosponsors:

Orrin Hatch
Arlen Specter
George Voinovich

Another gang of three to screw us over.

From the bill's page: S.160

Better pray the House somehow stops this or, barring that, some State sues. If not, the next step is for DC to get two Senators too.

8 posted on 02/24/2009 2:39:05 PM PST by batter (Wolverines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl

You’re right.


9 posted on 02/24/2009 2:40:14 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: batter

Yay! Even more democratic Senators and Congressmen!


10 posted on 02/24/2009 2:40:16 PM PST by reagan_fanatic (Let the 2nd American Revolution begin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

I’m in Hatch’s state and I’m not happy. Most here will just think: “great, we got another seat” and fail to notice torn Constitution in the corner.


11 posted on 02/24/2009 2:41:00 PM PST by batter (Wolverines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: batter

Yep. Once they get a House seat, it’ll be...”hey, you approved a House seat for us, so we should get a couple Senators, too!”

Give it up folks. We may as well rename the nation Untied States of Hussein.


12 posted on 02/24/2009 2:41:36 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: batter

Next DC will be wanting their 2 Senators.


13 posted on 02/24/2009 2:43:15 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Another choice quote from the article:

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who spoke in favor of the bill earlier this month, said the question of constitutionality should be resolved by the courts, not Congress.

14 posted on 02/24/2009 2:43:56 PM PST by batter (Wolverines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Oops. I didn't paste in the other half of that quote:

"As a matter of fundamental fairness, I believe the residents of the District of Columbia should have representation in the House," she said.

15 posted on 02/24/2009 2:46:29 PM PST by batter (Wolverines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: batter

Sounds like Collins knows it’s unconstitutional but doesn’t give a damn as long as it’s “fair”.


16 posted on 02/24/2009 2:48:09 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: batter

“Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who spoke in favor of the bill earlier this month, said the question of constitutionality should be resolved by the courts, not Congress.”

Classic gutless politician. “We’ll do whatever we feel like, let the courts tell us if it’s wrong.”

This is in effect ceding congressional power to the courts for a “Well we voted for it but the courts knocked it down”.


17 posted on 02/24/2009 2:52:58 PM PST by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: batter

Does that mean all the elected officials and their staffs; etc that actually live someplace else get two votes?


18 posted on 02/24/2009 2:54:23 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

This can be resolved by allowing those living there when the constitutional rule was imposed a vote.


19 posted on 02/24/2009 2:57:44 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

OK, how is this fair?

If DC deserves a Representative, it also deserves two Senators.

This half-hearted measure is a trick by liberals.

The SCOTUS will rule that DC either gets full representation or none. That will “force” two Senators onto DC without a vote taking place in Congress.


20 posted on 02/24/2009 3:01:31 PM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson